Show simple item record

Survival Analysis Using Auxiliary Variables Via Multiple Imputation, with Application to AIDS Clinical Trial Data

dc.contributor.authorFaucett, Cheryl L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchenker, Nathanielen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Jeremy M. G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:34:08Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:34:08Z
dc.date.issued2002-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationFaucett, Cheryl L.; Schenker, Nathaniel; Taylor, Jeremy M. G. (2002). "Survival Analysis Using Auxiliary Variables Via Multiple Imputation, with Application to AIDS Clinical Trial Data." Biometrics 58(1): 37-47. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66054>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-341Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1541-0420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66054
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11892691&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractWe develop an approach, based on multiple imputation, to using auxiliary variables to recover information from censored observations in survival analysis. We apply the approach to data from an AIDS clinical trial comparing ZDV and placebo, in which CD4 count is the time-dependent auxiliary variable. To facilitate imputation, a joint model is developed for the data, which includes a hierarchical change-point model for CD4 counts and a time-dependent proportional hazards model for the time to AIDS. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are used to multiply impute event times for censored cases. The augmented data are then analyzed and the results combined using standard multiple-imputation techniques. A comparison of our multiple-imputation approach to simply analyzing the observed data indicates that multiple imputation leads to a small change in the estimated effect of ZDV and smaller estimated standard errors. A sensitivity analysis suggests that the qualitative findings are reproducible under a variety of imputation models. A simulation study indicates that improved efficiency over standard analyses and partial corrections for dependent censoring can result. An issue that arises with our approach, however, is whether the analysis of primary interest and the imputation model are compatible.en_US
dc.format.extent1117461 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsThe International Biometric Society, 2002en_US
dc.subject.otherAIDSen_US
dc.subject.otherChange-point Modelen_US
dc.subject.otherDependent Censoringen_US
dc.subject.otherLongitudinal Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherMissing Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherRandom Effectsen_US
dc.titleSurvival Analysis Using Auxiliary Variables Via Multiple Imputation, with Application to AIDS Clinical Trial Dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA School of Public Health, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOffice of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics, 6525 Belcrest Road, Room 915, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11892691en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66054/1/j.0006-341X.2002.00037.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00037.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiometricsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBycott, P. W. and Taylor, J. M. G. ( 1998 ). A comparison of smoothing techniques for CD4 data measured with error in a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model. Statistics in Medicine 17, 2061 – 2077.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClayton, D. G. ( 1991 ). Models for the analysis of cohort and case–control studies with inaccurately measured exposures. In Statistical Models for Longitudinal Studies of Health, J. H. Dwyer, P. Lippert, M. Feinleib, and H. Hoffmeister ( eds ), 301 – 331. New York : Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Gruttola, V. and Tu, X. M. ( 1994 ). Modelling progression of CD4 lymphocyte count and its relationship to survival time. Biometrics 50, 1003 – 1014.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaucett, C. L. and Thomas, D. C. ( 1996 ). Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: A Gibbs sampling approach. Statistics in Medicine 15, 1663 – 1685.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaucett, C. L., Schenker, N., and Elashoff, R. ( 1998 ). Analysis of censored survival data with intermittently observed binary time-dependent covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 427 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkelstein, D. M. and Schoenfeld, D. A. ( 1994 ). Analysing survival in the presence of an auxiliary variable. Statistics in Medicine 13, 1747 – 1754.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming, T. R., Prentice, R. L., Pepe, M. S., and Glidden, D. ( 1994 ). Surrogate and auxiliary endpoints in clinical trials, with potential applications in cancer and AIDS research. Statistics in Medicine 13, 955 – 968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. ( 1990 ). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 398 – 409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeman, S. and Geman, D. ( 1984 ). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6, 721 – 741.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilks, W. R. ( 1992 ). Derivative-free adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. In Bayesian Statistics, Volume 4, J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith ( eds. ), 1 – 9. Oxford : Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. ( 1995 ). Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo. In Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter ( eds ), 1 – 19. London : Chapman and Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, R. J. ( 1994 ). A kernel method for incorporating information on disease progression in the analysis of survival. Biometrika 81, 527 – 540.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHogan, J. W. and Laird, N. M. ( 1997 ). Mixture models for the joint distribution or repeated measures and event times. Statistics in Medicine 16, 239 – 257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. ( 1980 ). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York : Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi, K. H. ( 1988 ). Imputation using Markov chains. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 30, 57 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalani, H. M. ( 1995 ). Modification of the re-distribution to the right algorithm using disease markers. Biometrika 82, 515 – 526.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeng, X.-L. ( 1994 ). Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input. Statistical Science 9, 538 – 557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, S. and Tsiatis, A. A. ( 1996 ). Non-parametric survival estimation using prognostic longitudinal covariates. Biometrics 52, 137 – 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePawitan, Y. and Self, S. ( 1993 ). Modeling disease marker processes in AIDS. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 719 – 726.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins, J. M. and Rotnitzky, A. ( 1992 ). Recovery of information and adjustment for dependent censoring using surrogate markers. In AIDS Epidemiology: Methodological Issues, N. P. Jewell, K. Dietz, and V. T. Farewell ( eds ), 297 – 331. Boston : BirkhÄuser.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. ( 1976 ). Inference and missing data. Biometrika 63, 581 – 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. ( 1987 ). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York : Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. ( 1996 ). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, 473 – 489.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. and Schenker, N. ( 1986 ). Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 366 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchenker, N. and Taylor, J. M. G. ( 1996 ). Partially parametric techniques for multiple imputation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 22, 425 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsiatis, A. A., De Gruttola, V., and Wulfsohn, M. S. ( 1995 ). Modeling the relationship of survival to longitudinal data measured with error. Applications to survival and CD4 counts in patients with AIDS. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 27 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolberding, P. A., Lagakos, S. W., Koch, M. A., et al. ( 1990 ). Zidovudine in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine 322, 941 – 949.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei, G. C. G. and Tanner, M. A. ( 1990 ). Posterior computations for censored regression data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 829 – 839.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei, G. C. G. and Tanner, M. A. ( 1991 ). Applications of multiple imputation to the analysis of censored regression data. Biometrics 47, 1297 – 1309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWulfsohn, M. S. and Tsiatis, A. A. ( 1997 ). A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. Biometrics 53, 330 – 339.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.