Show simple item record

Neighborhood Deprivation, Individual Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Function in Older People: Analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

dc.contributor.authorLang, Iain A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLlewellyn, David J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLanga, Kenneth M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Robert B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHuppert, Felicia A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMelzer, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:43:36Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2008-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationLang, Iain A.; Llewellyn, David J.; Langa, Kenneth M.; Wallace, Robert B.; Huppert, Felicia A.; Melzer, David (2008). "Neighborhood Deprivation, Individual Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Function in Older People: Analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56(2): 191-198. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66217>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66217
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18179489&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo assess the relationship between cognitive function, socioeconomic status, and neighborhood deprivation (lack of local resources of all types, financial and otherwise). DESIGN : Nationally representative cross-section. SETTING : The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). PARTICIPANTS : Seven thousand one hundred twenty-six community-dwelling individuals aged 52 and older and resident in urban areas. MEASUREMENTS : Individual cognitive function score and index of multiple deprivation (IMD) at the Super Output Area level, adjusting for health, lifestyle, and sociodemographic confounders. Analyses were conducted separately according to sex and age group (52–69 and ≥70). RESULTS : IMD affected cognitive function independent of the effects of education and socioeconomic status. For example, in fully adjusted models, women aged 70 and older had a standardized cognitive function score ( z -score) that was 0.20 points (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.01–0.39) lower in the bottom 20% of wealth than the top 20%, 0.44 points (95% CI=0.20–0.69) lower in the least-educated group than in the most educated, and 0.31 points (95% CI 0.15–0.48) lower if resident lived in an area in the bottom 20% of IMD than in the top 20%. CONCLUSION : In community-based older people in urban neighborhoods, neighborhood deprivation—living in a neighborhood with high levels of deprivation, compared with national levels—is associated with cognitive function independent of individual socioeconomic circumstances. The mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear and warrant further investigation.en_US
dc.format.extent107395 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2008, The American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherDeprivationen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherSocioeconomic Statusen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitionen_US
dc.titleNeighborhood Deprivation, Individual Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Function in Older People: Analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan and Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEpidemiology and Public Health Group, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18179489en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66217/1/j.1532-5415.2007.01557.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01557.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStimpson JP, Ju H, Raji MA et al. Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. Am J Health Behav 2007 ; 31 : 215 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkleby M, Sundquist K, Cubbin C. Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med 2007 ; 32 : 97 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavey Smith G, Hart C, Watt G et al. Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality : The Renfrew and Paisley study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 ; 52 : 399 – 405.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalea S, Ahern J, Nandi A et al. Urban neighborhood poverty and the incidence of depression in a population-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol 2007 ; 17 : 171 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRose D, Richards R. Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US food stamp program. Public Health Nutr 2004 ; 7 : 1081 – 1088.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearce J, Blakely T, Witten K et al. Neighborhood deprivation and access to fast-food retailing : A national study. Am J Prev Med 2007 ; 32 : 375 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson RJ. The impact of the built environment on health : An emerging field. Am J Public Health 2003 ; 93 : 1382 – 1384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllaway A, Macintyre S, Bonnefoy X. Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults : Secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. BMJ 2005 ; 331 : 611 – 612.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCagney KA, Browning CR, Wen M. Racial disparities in self-rated health at older ages : What difference does the neighborhood make? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2005 ; 60 : S181 – S190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAneshensel CS, Wight RG, Miller-Martinez D et al. Urban neighborhoods and depressive symptoms among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007 ; 62 : S52 – S69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalters K, Breeze E, Wilkinson P et al. Local area deprivation and urban-rural differences in anxiety and depression among people older than 75 years in Britain. Am J Public Health 2004 ; 94 : 1768 – 1774.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchootman M, Andresen EM, Wolinsky FD et al. Neighborhood conditions and risk of incident lower-body functional limitations among middle-aged African Americans. Am J Epidemiol 2006 ; 163 : 450 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults : Evidence from the Alameda County study. Am J Epidemiol 2002 ; 155 : 507 – 515.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEspino DV, Lichtenstein MJ, Palmer RF et al. Ethnic differences in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores : Where you live makes a difference. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001 ; 49 : 538 – 548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWight RG, Aneshensel CS, Miller-Martinez D et al. Urban neighborhood context, educational attainment, and cognitive function among older adults. Am J Epidemiol 2006 ; 163 : 1071 – 1078.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite L, Katzman R, Losonczy K et al. Association of education with incidence of cognitive impairment in three established populations for epidemiologic studies of the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1994 ; 47 : 363 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuppert FA, Gardener EA, McWilliams B. Cognitive function. In : Banks J, Breeze E, Lessof C et al., eds. Retirement, Health and Relationships of the Older Population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 2). London : Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2006, pp 217 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCagney KA, Lauderdale DS. Education, wealth, and cognitive function in later life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002 ; 57 : 163 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallacher JEJ, Elwood PC, Hopkinson C et al. Cognitive function in the Caerphilly study : Associations with age, social class, education and mood. Eur J Epidemiol 1999 ; 15 : 161 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge LK, Landerman LR, Blazer DG. Cognitive impairment. In : Robbins LN, Regier DA, eds. Psychiatric Disorders in America. New York : Free Press, 1991, pp 291 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor R, Conway L, Calderwood L et al. Methodology. In : Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R et al., eds. Health, Wealth and Lifestyles of the Older Population in England: The 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. London : Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2003, pp 357 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaudenbush SW. The quantitative assessment of neighborhood social environments. In : Kawachi I, Berkman LF, eds. Neighborhoods and Health. New York : Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 112 – 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaunder P, Landes DP, Steen N. The equity of access to primary dental care for children in the North East of England. Community Dent Health 2006 ; 23 : 116 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoods LM, Rachet B, Riga M et al. Geographical variation in life expectancy at birth in England and Wales is largely explained by deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 ; 59 : 115 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007 ; 92 : F11 – F14. Epub April 4, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeigh Y, Seagroatt V, Goldacre M et al. Impact of socio-economic deprivation on death rates after surgery for upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Br J Cancer 2006 ; 95 : 940 – 943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference27.  Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The English Indices of Deprivation 2004 (Revised). London : ODPM Publications, 2004, [on-line]. Available at http://www.communities.gov.uk/pub/446/Indicesofdeprivation2004revisedPDF2198Kb_id1128446.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates C. Methodology used for producing ONS's small area population estimates. Popul Trends 2006 ; 125 : 30 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHug PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 ; 12 : 189 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOfstedal MB, Fisher GG, Herzog AR. Documentation of Cognitive Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study. HRS Documentation Report DR-006 (March 2005).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuppert FA, Johnson T, Nickson J. High prevalence of prospective memory impairment in the elderly and in early-stage dementia : Findings from a population-based study. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000 ; 14 ( Special Issue ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards M, Kuh D, Hardy R et al. Lifetime cognitive function and timing of the natural menopause. Neurology 1999 ; 53 : 308 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLauner LJ, Feskens EJM, Kalmijn S et al. Smoking, drinking, and thinking : The Zutphen elderly study. Am J Epidemiol 1996 ; 143 : 219 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang I, Guralnik JM, Wallace RB et al. What level of alcohol consumption is hazardous for older people? Functioning and mortality in U.S. and English national cohorts. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007 ; 55 : 49 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang I, Wallace RB, Huppert FA et al. Moderate alcohol consumption in older adults is associated with better cognition and well-being than abstinence. Age Ageing 2007 ; 36 : 256 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes DE, Cauley JA, Lui LY et al. Women who maintain optimal cognitive function into old age. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007 ; 55 : 259 – 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendrie HC, Albert MS, Butters MA et al. The NIH cognitive and emotional health project. Alzheimer Dementia 2006 ; 2 : 12 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindenberger U, Baltes PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age : A strong connection. Psychol Aging 1994 ; 9 : 339 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi SC, Dinse HR. Aging of the brain, sensorimotor, and cognitive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2002 ; 26 : 729 – 732.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts RE, Kaplan GA, Shema SJ et al. Does growing old increase the risk for depression? Am J Psychiatry 1997 ; 154 : 1384 – 1390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFechner-Bates S, Coyne JC, Schwenk TL. The relationship of self-reported distress to depressive disorders and other psychopathology. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994 ; 62 : 550 – 559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornoni-Huntley J, Ostfeld A, Taylor J et al. Established populations for epidemiological studies in the elderly : Study design and methodology. Aging Clin Exp Res 1993 ; 1993 : 27 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrucci L, Guralnik JM, Salive ME et al. Cognitive impairment and risk of stroke in the older population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996 ; 44 : 237 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatalano R, Pickett KE. A taxonomy of research concerned with place and health. In : Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC, eds. Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications, 2000, pp 64 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMesser LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS et al. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J Urban Health 2006 ; 83 : 1041 – 1062.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlass TA, Balfour JL. Neighborhoods, aging, and functional limitations. In : Kawachi I, Berkman LF, eds. Neighborhoods and Health. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 303 – 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiez Roux AV, Mujahid MS, Morenoff JD et al. Respond to “Beyond the Metrics for Measuring Neighborhood Effects”. Am J Epidemiol 2007 ; 165 : 872 – 783.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearce J, Witten K, Hiscock R et al. Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources? Int J Epidemiol 2007 ; 36 : 348 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJencks C, Mayer SE. The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In : Lynn JLE, McGeary MHH, eds. Inner City Poverty in the United States. Washington, DC : National Academy Press, 1990, pp 111 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalea S, Ahern J. Invited commentary : Considerations about specificity of associations, causal pathways, and heterogeneity in multilevel thinking. Am J Epidemiol 2006 ; 163 : 1079 – 1082.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.