Show simple item record

The Effect of Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

dc.contributor.authorRichter, Holly E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoode, Patricia S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKenton, Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Morton B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBurgio, Kathryn L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKreder, Karlen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoalli, Pamelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWright, E. Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Anne M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-01T15:45:55Z
dc.date.available2010-04-01T15:45:55Z
dc.date.issued2007-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationRichter, Holly E.; Goode, Patricia S.; Kenton, Kim; Brown, Morton B.; Burgio, Kathryn L.; Kreder, Karl; Moalli, Pamela; Wright, E. James; Weber, Anne M. (2007). "The Effect of Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 55(6): 857-863. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66257>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66257
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17537085&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare perioperative morbidity and 1-year outcomes of older and younger women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). DESIGN : Prospective ancillary analysis. SETTING : Academic medical centers in National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Study. PARTICIPANTS : Women with POP and no symptoms of stress incontinence. INTERVENTION : Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with randomization to receive Burch colposuspension for treatment of possible occult incontinence or not. MEASUREMENTS : Perioperative complications and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months postoperatively). RESULTS : Three hundred twenty-two women aged 31 to 82 (21% aged ≥70), 93% white. Older women had higher baseline comorbidity ( P <.001) and more severe POP ( P= .003). Controlling for prolapse stage and whether Burch was performed, there were no age differences in complication rates. Older women had longer hospital stays (3.1±1.0 vs 2.7±1.5 days, P= .02) and higher prevalence of incontinence at 6 weeks (54.7% vs 37.2%, P= .005). At 3 and 12 months, there were no differences in self-reported incontinence, stress testing for incontinence, or prolapse stage. Improvements from baseline were significant on all QOL measures but with no age differences. CONCLUSION : Outcomes of prolapse surgery were comparable between older and younger women except that older women had slightly longer hospital stays.en_US
dc.format.extent87874 bytes
dc.format.extent3110 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2007, The American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherSurgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherPelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.subject.otherOlder Womenen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subject.otherLength of Stayen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Gerontology and Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBirmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland ; anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17537085en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66257/1/j.1532-5415.2007.01178.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01178.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuber KM, Boreo S, Choe JY. The demographics of pelvic floor disorders : Current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 ; 184 : 1496 – 1501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2.  U.S. Census Bureau. Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin, 2000–2050 [on-line]. Available at http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj Accessed June 6, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorse AN, Labin LC, Young SB et al. Exclusion of elderly women from published randomized trials of stress incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2004 ; 104 : 498 – 501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee AK. Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research : A descriptive study of published reports. BMJ 1997 ; 315 : 1059.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung VW, Weitzen S, Sokol ER et al. Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 ; 194 : 1411 – 1417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePugsley H, Barbrook C, Mayne CJ et al. Morbidity of incontinence surgery in women over 70 years old : A retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2005 ; 112 : 786 – 790.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStepp KJ, Barber MD, Yoo E-H et al. Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 ; 192 : 1630 – 1636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchweitzer KJ, Vierhout ME, Milani AL. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women of 80 years of age and older. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005 ; 84 : 286 – 289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrubaker L, Cundiff G, Fine P et al. A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE) : Design and methods. Control Clin Trials 2003 ; 24 : 629 – 642.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2006 ; 354 : 1557 – 1566.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 ; 175 : 10 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001 ; 185 : 1388 – 1395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) : I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992 ; 30 : 473 – 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric, Inc, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Donk D et al. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J 2003 ; 14 : 164 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR et al. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research. Application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 1992 ; 41 : 237 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE et al. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 2004 ; 149 : 762 – 772.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Mattis S et al. Cognitive effects after epidural vs general anesthesia in older adults. JAMA 1995 ; 274 : 44 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNahhas WA, Brown M. Gynecologic surgery in the aged. J Reprod Med 1990 ; 35 : 550 – 554.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman WH, Gallup DG, Burke JJ et al. Outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians in elective major gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2006 ; 195 : 547 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarey JM, Leach GE. Transvaginal surgery in the octogenarian using cadaveric fascia for pelvic prolapse and stress incontinence : Minimal one-year results compared to younger patients. Urology 2004 ; 63 : 665 – 670.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultana CJ, Campbell JW, Pisanelli WS et al. Morbidity and mortality of incontinence surgery in elderly women—an analysis of Medicare data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 ; 176 : 344 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichter HE, Redden DT, Duxbury AS et al. Pelvic floor surgery in the older woman : Enhanced compared with usual preoperative assessment. Obstet Gynecol 2005 ; 105 : 800 – 807.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcantonio FR, Flacker JM, Wright JR et al. Reducing delirium after hip fracture : A randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001 ; 49 : 516 – 522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–97. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003 ; 188 : 108 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979–97. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003 ; 189 : 70 – 75.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.