View Item 

Show simple item record

Dyadic Perception of Communication Style

dc.contributor.authorNorton, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Larryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:36:13Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:36:13Z
dc.date.issued1975en_US
dc.identifier.citationNorton, Robert; Miller, Larry (1975). "Dyadic Perception of Communication Style." Communication Research 2(1): 50-67. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66529>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0093-6502en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66529
dc.description.abstractAn experiment was designed to assess variations in perception of communication style by persons with differing Communication Style Measure (CSM) scores. Twenty-four dyads participated in an interpersonal encounter. Postinteraction data analysis indicates that subjects with low CSM scores do not report perceiving any appreciable difference between their communication style and that of subjects with high CSM scores. In contrast, subjects with high CSM scores report perceiving a significant difference. Clues about perceptual differences were investigated via step wise regression.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent692210 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleDyadic Perception of Communication Styleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66529/2/10.1177_009365027500200103.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/009365027500200103en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCommunication Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBales, R.F. (1970) Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference--- (1956) "Talk status and likeability as a function of talking and listening in decision-making groups," in L. D. White (ed.) The State of the Social Sciences. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference--- (1950) Interaction Process Analysis, A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBushard, B.L. (1959) "Methodology of the study," in K. L. Artis (ed.) The Symptom as Communication in Schizophrenia. New York: Grune & Stratton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooley, W.W. and P.R. Lohnes (1971) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDraper, N.R. and H. Smith (1966) Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoslin, D.A. (1962) "Accuracy of self perception and social acceptance." Sociometry 25: 283-290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, D. and L. Meltzer (1972) "Interpersonal judgments based on talkativeness: fact or artifact." Sociometry 35: 338-561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnott, P.D. and B.A. Drost (1965) "A measure of interpersonal dominance." Behavioral Research Methods and Instruments 1: 139-140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, M.A., I.D. Yalom, and M.B. Miles (1973) Encounter Groups: First Facts. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Quitty, L.L. (1957) "Elementary linkage analysis for isolating orthogonal and oblique types and typal relevancies." Educ. and Psych. Measurement 17: 207-229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference--- and J.A. Clark (1968) "Clusters from interative, intercolumar correlational analysis."Educ. and Psych. Measurement 28: 211-238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Quitty, L.L. and J.M. Frary (1971) "Reliable and valid hierarchical classifications." Educ. and Psych. Measurement 31: 321-346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMann, R.D. (1959) "A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups." Psych. Bull. 56: 241-270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference--- G.S. Gibbard, and J.J. Hartman (1967) Interpersonal Styles and Group Development. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMortensen, D. (1972) "A report on the construct of speech intensity." Presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Chicago, December.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunnally, J.C. (1967) Psychometric Theory. New York : Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlater, P.E. (1955) "Role differentiation in small groups." Amer. Soc. Rev. 20: 300-310.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_009365027500200103.pdf
Size:
675.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.