Problem-Solving Adequacy in Hospital Subunits
dc.contributor.author | Sutton, Robert I. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ford, Larry | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T18:36:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T18:36:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1982 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sutton, Robert; Ford, Larry (1982). "Problem-Solving Adequacy in Hospital Subunits." Human Relations 35(8): 675-701. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66536> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-7267 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66536 | |
dc.description.abstract | The problem-solving framework developed by Georgopoulos and his associates was used in the present investigation to explore the relationships among problem-solving adequacy, the appropriateness of organizational structures, and effectiveness in 52 subunits of a large, general hospital. Evidence obtained from interviews with subunit managers or directors, interviews with hospital executives, and aggregated responses of unit members are used to explore these relationships. Following most closely from Georgopoulos and Cooke's (1979) version of the problem-solving framework, hypotheses were derived from the following two propositions: (1) organizational subunits are problem-facing open systems that must solve a set of generic problems to be effective and (2) organizational structures are problem-solving mechanisms. Drawing from this theoretical perspective, it was hypothesized that subunit structural appropriateness would be positively related to problem-solving adequacy and to effectiveness. Subunit problem-solving adequacy was also hypothesized to be positively related to effectiveness. Further, it was hypothesized that problem-solving adequacy would mediate the relationship between structural appropriateness and subunit effectiveness. The results provide support for all of these hypotheses, although the positive relationship between structural adequacy and effectiveness receives only limited confirmation. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 2024109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Problem-Solving Adequacy in Hospital Subunits | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Work | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Institute for Social Research, Room 2252, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, United States Navy | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66536/2/10.1177_001872678203500805.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/001872678203500805 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Human Relations | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ALDRICH, H. E., & PFEFFER, J.Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 1976, 24, 279-287 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ARGYRIS, C. Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: Wiley, 1964. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | BALES, R. F. The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (eds.), Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1953. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CAMERON, K. Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 606-632 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | COOKE, R. A. Managing change in organizations. In G. Zaltman (Ed.), Management principles for nonprofit agencies and organizations. New York: AMACOM, 1979. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | COOKE, R. A., & ROUSSEAU, D. M.A model of system effectiveness and its application to educational organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1981, 17, 15-41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | COUGHLAN, R. J., & COOKE, R. A.Work attitudes. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance. Berkeley: Mc Cutchan, 1974. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CYERT, R. M., & MARCH, J. G.A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ETZIONI, A. A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Mc Millan, 1975. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | FORD, L. H., & SUTTON, R. I. Generic Problems of organizational derivations, relationships, and mechanisms for management. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Michigan, 1980. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GEORGOPOULOS, B. S. An open-system theory model for organizational research. In A. R. Neghandi & J. P. Schwitter (Eds.), Organizational behavior models. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University, 1970. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GEORGOPOULOS, B. S., & COOKE, R. A.Conceptual-theoretical framework for organizational study of hospital emergency services. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, Working Paper Series, 1979. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GEORGOPOULOS, B. S., & COOKE, R. A., & Associates. A comparative study of the organization and performance of hospital emergency services. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, Research Report Series, 1980. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | QEORGOPOULOS, B. S., & MANN, F. C.The community general hospital. New York: Mc Millan, 1962. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GEORGOPOULOS, B. S., & MATEJKO, A.The American general hospital as a complex social system. Health Services Research, 1967, 2, 76-112. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gt ORGOPOULOS, B. S., & TANNENBAUM, A. S.A Study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22, 234-250. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | GOODMAN P. S., & PENNINGS, J. M. & ASSOCIATES. New perspectives on effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | KATZ, D., & KAHN, R. L.The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1978. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | MARCH, J. G., & SIMONS, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | MINTZBERG, H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row, 1973. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | PARSONS, T., BALES, R. F., & SHILS, E. A.Phase movement in relation to motivation, symbol formation, and role structure. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1953. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | PFEFFER, J. Usefulness of the concept. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings & Associates (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | PRZEWORSKI, A., & TEUNE, H.The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley, 1970. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | SCHWARZ, R. A test of a model of member integration in school organizations. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Michigan, 1980. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | SIMON, H. A. Models of man, social and rational. New York: Wiley, 1957. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | THOMPSON, J. D. Organizations in action. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1967. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | YUCHTMAN, E., & SEASHORE, S. E.A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 891-903. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.