View Item 

Show simple item record

Preferred Styles of Conflict Resolution
dc.contributor.authorGabrielidis, Cristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStephan, Walteren_US
dc.contributor.authorYbarra, Oscaren_US
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos Pearson, Virginiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVillareal, Lucilaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:46:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:46:46Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationGabrielidis, Cristina; Stephan, Walter; Ybarra, Oscar; Dos Santos Pearson, Virginia; Villareal, Lucila (1997). "Preferred Styles of Conflict Resolution." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28(6): 661-677. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66715>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0221en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66715
dc.description.abstractThis study examined cultural differences in preferences for conflict resolution styles using the dual-concern model. It was found that students in a collectivistic culture (Mexico) preferred conflict resolution styles that emphasized concern for the outcomes of others (accommodation and collaboration) to a greater degree than did students from an individualistic culture (United States). Consistent with this greater display of concern for others, the Mexican students scored significantly higher than the U.S. students on scales measuring interdependence of the self. However, they also scored higher on a scale measuring the independence of the self, suggesting that independence of the self and interdependence of the self may be separate dimensions, rather than representing a continuum. Correlational findings suggested that for interpersonal conflicts, avoidance may reflect a concern for others, rather than a lack of concern for others, as postulated by the dual-concern model.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1579940 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titlePreferred Styles of Conflict Resolutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNew Mexico State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNew Mexico State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNew Mexico State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstituto Tecnol6gico de Judrez, Mexicoen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66715/2/10.1177_0022022197286002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022022197286002en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnlund, D.C. (1989). Communicative styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerman, J. J., Berman, V. M., & Singh, P. (1985). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in children's decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1557-1564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrislin, R. W. (1981). Cross-cultural encounters: Face-to-face interaction. New York: Pergamon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChua, E., & Gudykunst, W. (1987). Conflict resolution style in low- and, high-context cultures. Communication Research Reports, 4, 32-37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCondon, J. C. (1985). Good neighbors: Communicating with the Mexicans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDÍaz-Guerrero, R. (1967). Psychology of the Mexican: Culture and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDÍaz-Loving, R., DÍaz-Guerrero, R., Helmreich, R., & Spence, J. (1981). Comparaci6n trans-cultural y analisis psicometrico de una dedida de rasgos masculinos (instrumentales) y femininos (expresivos) [Cross-cultural comparison and psychometric analysis of masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits]. Revista de la Asociaci6n Latinoamericana de PsicologÍa Social, 1, 3-37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGire, J. T., & Carment, D. W. (1992). Dealing with disputes: The influence of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 81-95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser, R., & Glaser, C. (1991). Negotiating style profile. King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKashima, Y. (1987). Conceptions of person: Implications in individualism/collectivism research. In C. Kagit,ibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. (pp. 410-424). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, U., Triandis, H. C., KagitÇibasi, C., Choi, S., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994). Individualism and collectivism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Tummala, P., Kurokawa, M., & Kato, K. S. (1991). Self-other similarity judgments depend on culture. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnight, C., Kagan, S., & Martinez-Romero, S. (1982). Culture and development of conflict resolution style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 43-59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKras, E. (1989). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 125-136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K., Au, Y., FernÁndez-Dols, J. M., & Iwawaki, S. (1992). Preference for methods of conflict processing in two collectivist cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 272, 195-209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K., Bond, M. H., Carment, D. W., Krishnan, L., & Liebrand, W.B.G. (1990). Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methods of conflict processing: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 373-338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K., & Iwawaki, S. (1988). Cultural collectivism and distributive behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 35-49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K., & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedure and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung, K., & Wu, P. (1990). Dispute processing: A cross-cultural analysis. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 209-231). London: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMann, L., Radford, M., & Kanagawa, C. (1985). Cross-cultural differences in children's decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1557-1564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarch, R. M. (1988). The Japanese negotiator. New York: Kodansha.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson, V.M.S., & Stephan, W. G. (in press). Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the U.S.International Journal of Intercultural Relations.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePruitt, D. G. (1982). Negotiation behavior. New York. Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePruitt, D. G. (1991). Strategic choice in negotiation. In J. W. Brislin & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Negotiation theory and practice. (pp. 78-89). Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePruitt, D. G., & Carnavale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, J. Z. (1992). Conflict, negotiation, and peace: Psychological perspectives and roles. In S. Staubs & P. Green (Eds.), Psychology and social responsibility: Facing global challenge. (pp. 121-144). New York: New York University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, J. Z., & Brislin, J. W. (1991). Negotiation theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (199-). Social conflict. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpence, J. T. (1985). Achievement American style: The rewards and costs of individualism. The American Psychologist, 40, 1285-1295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity, their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Cabezas de Vargas, M. (1996). Emotional expression in Costa Rica and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 147-160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSternberg, R. J., & Dobson, D. M. (1987). Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 794-812.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTing-Toomey, S. (1988, May). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communications Association, New Orleans.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C. (1990). Toward cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism in Latin America. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 24, 199-210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C., Brislin, R. W., & Hui, C. H. (1988). Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 269-289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M. J., & Clack, R L. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 398-415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C., Marin, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). SimpatÍa as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363-1375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrubisky, P., Ting-Toomey, S., & Sung-Ling, L. (1991). The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 65-84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Bond, M. H. (1989). Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 186-200.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0022022197286002.pdf
Size:
1.506MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.