The Effectiveness of Correctional Programs
dc.contributor.author | Robison, James | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Gerald | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T18:48:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T18:48:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1971 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Robison, James; Smith, Gerald (1971). "The Effectiveness of Correctional Programs." Crime & Delinquency 17(1): 67-80. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66740> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0011-1287 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66740 | |
dc.description.abstract | Justifications for the development of special correctional pro grams and for the choice of sentencing disposition for an individual offender are frequently based on claims of greater rehabilitative efficacy. While considerable evidence exists that some types of offenders have relatively more or less likelihood of recidivism than others, there is, as yet, almost no evidence that available correctional alternatives have any impact on those likelihoods. The article reviews findings from studies of correc tion in California for five critical choices in offender process ing : (1) imprisonment or probation, (2) length of stay in prison, (3) treatment program in prison, (4) intensity of parole or probation supervision, and (5) outright discharge from prison or release on parole. The authors conclude that variations in recidivism rates among these alternatives are, for the most part, attributable to initial differences among the types of offenders processed and that the remaining differences in violation rate between programs may be accounted for by differences in inter preting an event as a violation or in officially designating it as such. No evidence was found to support claims of superior re habilitative efficacy of one correctional alternative over another . | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 903437 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | The Effectiveness of Correctional Programs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Law and Legal Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | NCCD Research Center, Davis, Calif., Bay Area Research Unit, California Department of Corrections, Oakland, School of Criminology, University of California (Berkeley), University of California (Los Angeles), University of Michigan, University of California (Berkeley) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Sociology, University of Utah, University of Louisville, University of California (Berkeley) | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66740/2/10.1177_001112877101700108.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/001112877101700108 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Crime & Delinquency | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.