Show simple item record

China's Political Reforms: A Net Assessment

dc.contributor.authorLieberthal, Kennethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:49:13Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:49:13Z
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.citationLieberthal, Kenneth (1984). "China's Political Reforms: A Net Assessment." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 476(1): 19-33. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66758>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-7162en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66758
dc.description.abstractChina's leaders since the death of Mao Zedong have tried to reform the political system so as to reduce the level of political coercion, increase the use of rational/legal processes, put talented individuals into responsible positions, enhance their capacity to base decisions on pragmatic criteria, and restore and strengthen the legitimacy of the polity. Their efforts to further these goals have produced important results, but the reforms still have not taken root. The reforms have been hedged in by fundamental untouchables, resisted by uncooperative cadres, and undercut by the inherent incompatibility of different components of the reform package itself. The prognosis for the various elements of the reform effort depends both on keeping the initiative in the hands of the reformers at the top of the Communist party and on achieving good results in the economic arena.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1046751 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleChina's Political Reforms: A Net Assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Chinese Studies of the University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66758/2/10.1177_000271628447600103.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/000271628447600103en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scienceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.