Show simple item record

Conclusion

dc.contributor.authorRogers, Priscilla S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:53:37Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:53:37Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.citationRogers, Priscilla (1993). "Conclusion." Business Communication Quarterly 56(1): 47-48. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66835>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1080-5699en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66835
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent131842 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleConclusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66835/2/10.1177_108056999305600115.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/108056999305600115en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBusiness Communication Quarterlyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernard, H.R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R.L., & Herndl, C.G. (1986). An ethnographic study of corporate writing: Job status as reflected in written text. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, V.B. (1992). Audience factors in the collaborative writing, cycling, and revision of a technical report at a contract research and development laboratory (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouture, B. (Ed.). (1986). Functional Approaches to Writing: Research Perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, G.A. (Forthcoming). Collaboration and conflict: A contextual exploration of group writing and positive emphasis. Written Language Series, Marcia Farr (Ed.), Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, G.A. (1990). A Bakhtinian exploration of factors affecting the collaborative writing of an executive letter of an annual report. Research in the teaching of English, 24, 173-202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocker, K.O. (1992). What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and social service workers in a state agency. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook. 37-52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Closkey, D.N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParadis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R & D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami, (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePorter, L.W., & Mc Kibbin, L.E. (1988). Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.