View Item 

Show simple item record

Psychological Testing by Computer: Effect On Response Bias

dc.contributor.authorKoson, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKitchen, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKochen, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStodolosky, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:55:09Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:55:09Z
dc.date.issued1970en_US
dc.identifier.citationKoson, D.; Kitchen, C.; Kochen, M.; Stodolosky, D. (1970). "Psychological Testing by Computer: Effect On Response Bias." Educational and Psychological Measurement 30(4): 803-810. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66862>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-1644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66862
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent401544 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titlePsychological Testing by Computer: Effect On Response Biasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMental Health Research Institute, University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66862/2/10.1177_001316447003000403.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/001316447003000403en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEducational and Psychological Measurementen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBock, R. D. Components of variance due to content and acquiescence in the My and Pt scales of the MMPI. Chapel Hill, N. C.: Psychometric Laboratory Research Memo No. 21,1964.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L. E. Response sets and test validity. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1964, 6, 475-495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L. E. Further evidence of response sets and test design. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1950, 10, 3-29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L. E. Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper, 1960.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunnette, M. D. and Heneman, H. G., Jr. Influence of scale administration on employee attitude response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1956, 40, 73-77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards, A. L. The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden, 1957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeneman, H. G., Jr. and Yoder, D. Employee opinion survey by remote control. Personnel Journal, 1953, 32, 169-173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson, D. N. In Berg, I. A. (ed.) Response Set in Personality Measurement. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, S. J. Separate set and content scores for personality and attitude scales. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1961, 21, 915-923.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrne, M. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 776-783.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearlin, L. I. The appeals of anonymity in questionnaire responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1961, 25, 640-647.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, R. On the social psychology of the psychology experiment ; the experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. American Scientist, 1963, 51, 268-283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. E. Examination by computer. Behavioral Science, 1963, 8, 76-79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStricker, L. J. Acquiescence and social desirability response styles, item characteristics, and conformity. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 319-341 (Monograph Suppl. 2-12).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_001316447003000403.pdf
Size:
392.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.