Using Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Development
dc.contributor.author | Hammett, Patrick C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wahl, Shannon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Baron, Jay | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T18:55:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T18:55:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Hammett, Patrick; Wahl, Shannon; Baron, Jay (1999). "Using Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Development." Concurrent Engineering 7(4): 309-318. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66875> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1063-293X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66875 | |
dc.description.abstract | In order to improve engineering product designs and reduce the number of problems that occur during a new product launch, firms have focused on integrating downstream product development processes into the design phases. Unfortunately, this resource inte gration to solve problems has been less common in the back-end of product development, particularly for complex products involving many components such as an automotive body. Here, manufacturing firms use sequential validation procedures first to approve compo nents, then subassemblies, and finally the end product. One trend has been to tighten component tolerances in efforts to avoid or mini mize downstream assembly problems. These stricter component requirements, however, often result in timing delays and cost overruns due to unnecessary rework of components. For complex-assemblies, the use of "flexible criteria" and an approach called "functional build" can significantly reduce validation time and costs yet still meet end product quality objectives. This paper examines this functional build approach to manufacturing validation and demonstrates its effectiveness with an automotive case example. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 922879 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Manufacturing Validation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Process Capability | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Automotive Bodies | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Integrated Product and Process Development | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Metal Stamp Ing | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Tolerances. | en_US |
dc.title | Using Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Development | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Engineering (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66875/2/10.1177_1063293X9900700404.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1063293X9900700404 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Concurrent Engineering | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Clark, K.B. and T. Fujimoto 1991. Product Development Performance—Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kamath, R.R. and J.K. Liker 1994. "A Second Look at Japanese Product Development," Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Karlsson. C., R. Nellore and K. Soderquist 1998. "Black Box Engineering: Redefining the Role of Product Specifications," Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 534-549. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bhattacharya. S., V. Krishnan, and V. Mahajan 1998. "Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments," Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 11, November, pp. S50-S64. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Moffat, L.K. 1998. "Tools and Teams: Competing Models of Integrated Product Development Performance," Journal of Engineering Technology Management, Vol. 15, pp. 55-85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Haddad, C. 1996. "Operationalizing the Concept of Concurrent Engineering: A Case Study from the U.S. Auto Industry," | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.