Show simple item record

Using Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Development

dc.contributor.authorHammett, Patrick C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWahl, Shannonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaron, Jayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T18:55:55Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T18:55:55Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationHammett, Patrick; Wahl, Shannon; Baron, Jay (1999). "Using Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Development." Concurrent Engineering 7(4): 309-318. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66875>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1063-293Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/66875
dc.description.abstractIn order to improve engineering product designs and reduce the number of problems that occur during a new product launch, firms have focused on integrating downstream product development processes into the design phases. Unfortunately, this resource inte gration to solve problems has been less common in the back-end of product development, particularly for complex products involving many components such as an automotive body. Here, manufacturing firms use sequential validation procedures first to approve compo nents, then subassemblies, and finally the end product. One trend has been to tighten component tolerances in efforts to avoid or mini mize downstream assembly problems. These stricter component requirements, however, often result in timing delays and cost overruns due to unnecessary rework of components. For complex-assemblies, the use of "flexible criteria" and an approach called "functional build" can significantly reduce validation time and costs yet still meet end product quality objectives. This paper examines this functional build approach to manufacturing validation and demonstrates its effectiveness with an automotive case example.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent922879 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherManufacturing Validationen_US
dc.subject.otherProcess Capabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherAutomotive Bodiesen_US
dc.subject.otherIntegrated Product and Process Developmenten_US
dc.subject.otherMetal Stamp Ingen_US
dc.subject.otherTolerances.en_US
dc.titleUsing Flexible Criteria to Improve Manufacturing Validation During Product Developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEngineering (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66875/2/10.1177_1063293X9900700404.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1063293X9900700404en_US
dc.identifier.sourceConcurrent Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, K.B. and T. Fujimoto 1991. Product Development Performance—Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamath, R.R. and J.K. Liker 1994. "A Second Look at Japanese Product Development," Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarlsson. C., R. Nellore and K. Soderquist 1998. "Black Box Engineering: Redefining the Role of Product Specifications," Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 534-549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhattacharya. S., V. Krishnan, and V. Mahajan 1998. "Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments," Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 11, November, pp. S50-S64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoffat, L.K. 1998. "Tools and Teams: Competing Models of Integrated Product Development Performance," Journal of Engineering Technology Management, Vol. 15, pp. 55-85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaddad, C. 1996. "Operationalizing the Concept of Concurrent Engineering: A Case Study from the U.S. Auto Industry,"en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.