Predictors of Teachers' Preferences Concerning their Evaluation
dc.contributor.author | Stark, Joan S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lowther, Malcolm A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T19:05:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T19:05:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1984 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Stark, Joan; Lowther, Malcolm (1984). "Predictors of Teachers' Preferences Concerning their Evaluation." Educational Administration Quarterly 20(4): 76-106. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67034> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0013-161X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67034 | |
dc.description.abstract | Personal backgrounds, skills, and attitudes toward professional success reported by experienced classroom teachers modestly predicted preferences for ways of evaluating their work. Teachers view their work as an amalgam: a labor, a profession, a craft, and an art. Achieving consensus regarding teacher evaluation may require multifaceted approaches that recognize varied teacher needs and backgrounds. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 2562241 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Predictors of Teachers' Preferences Concerning their Evaluation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Education, The University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Education, The University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67034/2/10.1177_0013161X84020004006.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0013161X84020004006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Educational Administration Quarterly | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.