View Item 

Show simple item record

Location Preferences of Family Firms: Strategic Decision Making or “Home Sweet Home”?
dc.contributor.authorKahn, Joel A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Douglas A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:07:00Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:07:00Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationKahn, Joel A.; Henderson, Douglas A. (1992). "Location Preferences of Family Firms: Strategic Decision Making or “Home Sweet Home”?." Family Business Review 3(5): 271-282. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67069>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0894-4865en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67069
dc.description.abstractSelecting a business location is among the most important strategic decisions for family firms. Yet the separate demands of the family and the business often prove difficult to balance. A comparison of location preferences in family and nonfamily firms provides insight into the family influence on strategic decision making.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1421857 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleLocation Preferences of Family Firms: Strategic Decision Making or “Home Sweet Home”?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate School of Business Administration, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Law, University of Kentucky.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67069/2/10_1111_j_1741-6248_1992_00271_x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00271.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartik, T.“Business Location Decisions in the U.S.: Estimates of the Effects of Unionization, Taxes, and Other Characteristics of State.”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1984, 3, 14–22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlair, J. P., and Premus, R.“Major Factors in Industrial Location: A Review.”Economic Development Quarterly, 1987, 1(1), 72–85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalder, G. H.“The Peculiar Problems of a Family Business.”Business Horizons, 1961, 4(3), 93–102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlton, D. W.“The Location and Employment Choices of New Firms: An Econometric Model with Discrete and Continuous Endogenous Variables.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 1983, 65, 440–449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman, K., and Walker, D. Industrial Location: Principles and Policies. New York: Blackwell, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohn, T., and Lindberg, R. A. Survival and Growth: Management Strategies for the Small Firm. New York: AMACOM, 1974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenison, D. R., and Hart, S. L. Revival in the Rust Belt: Tracking the Evolution and Development of an Urban Region. Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonnelly, R. G.“The Family Business.”Harvard Business Review, 1964, 42, 93–105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDue, J. F.“Studies of State-Local Tax Influences on Location of Industry.”National Tax Journal, 1961, 14(2), 163–173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord Motor Company. “Quick Location Map of Ford Facilities in Dearborn.” Internal company document, 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalbraith, C. S.“High Technology Location and Development: The Case of Orange County.”California Management Review, 1985, 28(1), 98–109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrieson, R. E., Hamovitch, W., Levenson, A. M., and Morgenstern, R. D.“The Effect of Business Tax on the Location of Industry.”Journal of Urban Economics, 1977, 4(2), 170–185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarding, C. F.“Quantifying Abstract Factors in Facility-Locations Decisions.”Industrial Development, 1988, 157(3), 24–27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, S. L., and Denison, D. R.“The Creation and Development of New Technology-Based Organizations: A System Dynamics Model.”Policy Studies Review, 1987, 6, 512–528.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, S. L., Denison, D. R., and Henderson, D. A.“A Contingency Approach to Firm Location: The Influence of Industrial Sector and Level of Technology.”Policy Studies Journal, 1989, 17(3), 599–623.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollander, B. S., and Elman, N. S.“Family Owned Businesses: An Emerging Field.”Family Business Review, 1988, 1(2), 145–164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJarboe, K. P.“Location Decisions of High-Tech Firms: A Case Study.”Technovation, 1986, 4, 117–129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevinson, H.“Conflicts That Plague the Family Business.”Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49, 90–98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Dermott, P. J., and Taylor, M. J.“Attitudes, Images and Location: The Subjective Context of Decision Making in New Zealand Manufacturing.”Economic Geography, 1976, 52(4), 325–347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalizia, E.“The Locational Attractiveness of the Southeast to High-Technology Manufacturers.” In D. Whittington (ed.), High Hopes for High Technology: Microelectronics Policy in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, E. J., and Rice, A. K. Systems of Organization. London: Tavistock, 1967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePremus, R. Location of High Technology Firms and Regional Economic Development. Washington: U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee, Joint Committee Print, 1982.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpton, N.“The Institute for Family Business.”Review of Business, 1991, 13(1/2), 6–9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpton, N., and Seaman, S.“Keeping the Family Business Healthy.” Working paper no. 211991, Baylor University, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhiteside, M. F., and Herz Brown, F.“Drawbacks of a Dual Systems Approach to Family Firms: Can We Expand Our Thinking?”Family Business Review, 1991, 4(4), 383–396.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10_1111_j_1741-6248_1992_00271 ...
Size:
1.355MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.