Show simple item record

Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage

dc.contributor.authorBagozzi, Richard P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Fred D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWarshaw, Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:13:02Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:13:02Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationBagozzi, Richard; Davis, Fred; Warshaw, Paul (1992). "Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage." Human Relations 45(7): 659-686. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67175>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0018-7267en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67175
dc.description.abstractBeliefs, attitudes, and intentions are important factors in the adoption of computer technologies. While contemporary representations have focused on explaining the act of using computers, the role of learning to use the computer needs to be better understood within the overall adoption process. Inadequate learning can curtail the adoption and use of a potentially productive system. We introduce a new theoretical model, the theory of trying, in which computer learning is conceptualized as a goal determined by three attitude components: attitude toward success, attitude toward failure, and attitude toward the process of goal pursuit. Intentions to try and actual trying are the theoretical mechanisms linking these goal-directed attitudes to goal attainment. An empirical study is conducted to ascertain the construct validity and utility of the new theory within the context of the adoption of a word processing package. Specifically, we examine convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, stability, discriminant validity, criterion related validity, predictive validity, and nomological validity in a longitudinal field study of 107 users of the program. The new theory is compared to two models: the theory of reasoned action from the field of social psychology and the technology acceptance model, recently introduced in the management literature. Overall, the findings stress the importance of scrutinizing the goals of decision makers and their psychological reactions to these goals in the prediction of the adoption of computers.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2384517 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherAdoption of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.otherAttitudesen_US
dc.subject.otherTryingen_US
dc.subject.otherConstruct Validityen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Business Administration, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCalifornia Polytechnic State University.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67175/2/10.1177_001872679204500702.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/001872679204500702en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHuman Relationsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAJZEN, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer, 1985, pp. 11-39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAJZEN, I., & FISHBEIN, M.Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceALAVI, M. An assessment of the prototying approach to information systems development. Communication of the ACM, 1984, 27, 556-563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceALLWOOD, C. M., & WIKSTROM, T.Learning complex computer programs. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1986, 5, 217-225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBAGOZZI, R. P. An examination of the validity of two models of attitude. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1981, 16, 323-359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBAGOZZI, R. P. Enactment Processes in the Theory of Reasoned Action, 1991. Unpublished working paper, The University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBAGOZZI, R. P., & WARSHAW, P. R.Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 1990, 17, 127-140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBAROUDI, J. J., OLSON, M. H., & IVES, B.An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Comm. ACM, 1986, 29, 232-238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBENBASAT, I., & DEXTER, A. S.An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Quart, 1986, 59-84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBENBASAT, I., DEXTER, A. S., & TODD, P.An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: An integration of the findings. Communication of the ACM, 1986, 29, 1094-1105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBENSON, D. H. A field study of end-user computing: Findings and issues. MIS Quarterly, 1983, 35-45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBJORN-ANDERSON, N., EASON, K., & ROBEY, D.Managing computer impact: An international study of management and organizations, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBUDD, R. J. Response bias and the theory of reasoned action. Social Cognition, 1987, 5, 95-107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCARROLL, J. M., & THOMAS, J. C.Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, 1982, 12, 107-116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCARROLL, J. M., & CARRITHERS, C.Training wheels in a user interface. Communication of the ACM, 1984, 27, 800-806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCARROLL, J. M., & ROSSON, M. B.Paradox of the active user. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987, pp. 80-111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCOOK, T. D., & CAMPBELL, D. T.Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings, Chicago: Rand Mc Nally, 1979.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCZAJA, S. J., HAMMOND, K., BLASCOVICH, J. J., & SWEDE, H.Learning to use a word-processing system as a function of training strategy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1986, 5, 203-216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDAVIS, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13, 319-340.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P., & WARSHAW, P. R.User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 1989, 35, 982-1003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDICKSON, G. W., DE SANCTIS, G., & Mc BRIDE, D. J.Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: A cumulative experimental approach. Communication of the ACM, 1986, 29, 40-47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEASON, K. D. The process of introducing information technology. Behavior and Information Technology, 1982, 1, 197-213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEASON, K. D. Methods of planning the electronic workplace. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1987, 6, 229-238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEASON, K. D. Information technology and organizational change. London: Taylor & Francis, 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFELDMAN, J. M., & LYNCH, J. G.Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73, 421-435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFISHBEIN, M., & AJZEN, I.Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFISHBEIN, M., & STASSON, M.The role of desires, self-predictions, and perceived control in the prediction of training session attendance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990, 20, 173-198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFRANZ, C. R., & ROBEY, C.Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 1986, 17, 329-356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGINZBERG, M. J. Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science, 1981, 27, 459-478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHONAN, P. Captains of computing: America's top 500 CEOs benefit from personal computing. Personal Computing, 1986, 131-133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHOWARD, G. S. Computer anxiety and the use of microcomputers ill management. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIVES, B., OLSON, M. H., & BAROUDI, J. J.The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communication of the ACM, 1983, 26, 785-793.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJAGODZINSKI, A. P. A theoretical basis for the representation of on-line computer systems to naive users. International Journal of Man-Machine Systems, 1983, 18, 215-252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJORESKOG, K. G., & SORBOM, D.LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS, Inc., 1989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKALEN, T., & ALLWOOD, C. M.A survey of the training of computer users in Swedish companies. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1991, 10, 81-90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLEE, D. M. S. Usage patterns and sources of assistance for personal computer users. MIS Quarterly, 1986, 313-325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLEWIN, K., DEMBO, T., FESTINGER, L., & SEARS, P. S.Levels of aspiration. In J. Mc V. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the Behavior Disorders. New York: Ronald Press, 1944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLONG, J., HAMMOND, N., BARNARD, P., MORTON, J., & CLARK, I.Introducing the interactive computer at work. Behavior and Information Technology, 1983, 2, 39-106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMACK, R. L., LEWIS, C. H., & CARROLL, J. M.Learning to use word processors: Problems and prospects. ACM Transactions of Office Systems, 1983, 1, 254-271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMALONE, T. W. Toward a theory of intrinsically motivated instruction. Cognitive Science, 1981, 4, 333-369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc KENDREE, J. E., SCHORNO, S. S., & CARROLL, J. M.Personal planner: The scenario machine as a research tool. Videotape presentation. CHI '85 Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings, NY: ACM SIGHCHI, 1985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMUMFORD E., & WEIR, M.Computer systems in work design: The ETHICS method. London: Associated Business Press, 1979.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceROBEY, D. User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22, 527-538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSRINIVASAN, A. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: Associations and implications. MIS Quarterly, September 1985, 243-253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSWANSON, E. B. Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: A review. OMEGA, 1982, 10157-165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSWANSON, E. B. Information channel disposition and use. Decision Sciences, 1987, 18, 131-145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSWANSON, E. B. Information system implementation: Bridging the gap between design and utilization. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWARSHAW, P. R., SHEPPARD, B. H., & HARTWICK, J.The intention and self-prediction of goals and behavior. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advances in Marketing Communication. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Forthcoming.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYOUNG, T. R. The lonely micro. Datamation, 1984, 30, 100-113.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.