View Item 

Show simple item record

Evaluation at the Frontier: Some "Timely" Comments for Future Use

dc.contributor.authorWortman, Paul M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:15:11Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:15:11Z
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.citationWortman, Paul (1984). "Evaluation at the Frontier: Some "Timely" Comments for Future Use." American Journal of Evaluation 5(1): 33-44. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67212>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2140en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67212
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent586965 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation at the Frontier: Some "Timely" Comments for Future Useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumERS Presidential Address University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67212/2/10.1177_109821408400500110.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/109821408400500110en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Evaluationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoruch, R.F., Cordray, D.S., et al. (1983). Recommendations to Congress and their rationale: The Holtzman project. Evaluation Review, 1983, 7, 5-35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoruch, R.F., & Wortman, P.M. (1979). Implications of educational evaluation for evaluation policy. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education. Washington, DC : AERA.,en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on training. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago : Rand Mc Nally.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChelimsky, E. (1981). Designing backward from the end-use. Paper presented to the Evaluation Research Society Annual Meeting, October.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30 116-127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L.J. (1977). Remarks to the New Society. Evaluation Research Society Newsletter, 1, 1-3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L.J. & associates (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDatta, L.-E. (1976). The impact of the Westinghouse/ Ohio evaluation on the development of Project Head Start: An examination of the immediate and longer-term effects and how they came about. In C. C. Abt (Ed.), The evaluation ofsocialprograms. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, J.P., Mc Peek, B., & Mosteller, F. (1977). Progress in surgery and anesthesia: Benefits and risks of innovative therapy. In J. P. Bunker, B. A. Barnes, and F. Mosteller (Eds.), Costs, risks and benefits of surgery. New York: Oxford (1980). University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeilman, J.G. (1980). Paradigmatic choices in evaluation methodology. Evaluation Review, 4, 693-712.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouse, E.R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKantrowitz, A. et al. (1976). The science court experiment: An interim report. Science, 193, 653-656.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolata, G. (1982). Heart study produces a surprise result. Science, 218, 31-32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazar, I., Hubbell, V.R., Murray, H., Rosche, M., and Royce, J. (1977). The persistence of preschool effects: A long-term follow-up of fourteen infant and preschool experiments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosteller, F. (1981). Innovation and evaluation. Science, 211, 881-886,en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMultiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group (1982). Multiple Risk Factor intervention trial: Risk factor changes and mortality results. JAMA. 248, 1465-1477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholson, R.A. & Berman, J.S. (1983). Is follow-up necessary in evaluating psychotherapy. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 261-278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatton, M.Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiecken, H.W., Boruch, R.F., & associates (1974). Social experimentation: A methodfor planning and evaluating social intervention. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1979). The ecology of program research and evaluation: A model of evaluation succession. In L. Sechrest and associates (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss, C.H. (1977). Introduction. In C. H. Weiss (Ed.), Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWortman, P.M., & Bryant, F.B. (in press). School desegregation and black achievement: An integrative review. Sociological Methods and Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWortman, P.M., Vinokur, A., Sechrest, L., & associates(1982). Evaluation of the NIH consensus Development Process-Phase 1: Final Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWortman, P.M. & Yeaton, W.H. (1983). Synthesis of results in controlled trials of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. In R. J. Light (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 8). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_109821408400500110.pdf
Size:
573.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.