Show simple item record

Discourse and the Projection of Corporate Culture: The Mission Statement

dc.contributor.authorSwales, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Priscilla S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:22:30Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:22:30Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationSwales, John; Rogers, Priscilla (1995). "Discourse and the Projection of Corporate Culture: The Mission Statement." Discourse & Society 2(6): 223-242. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67339>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0957-9265en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67339
dc.description.abstractThis article explores how corporations project their corporate philosophy through `Mission Statements'. Linguistic and textual analysis of such statements drawn from a sizeable corpus allows us to typify the texts as constituting a non-routine, organizational genre, and one that has recently become of some significance. This discussion serves as a foundation for a contextual and intertextual analysis (cf. Fairclough, 1992) of Mission Statements from two well-known US companies. By detailing the history, rationale and role of these Mission Statements we indicate how the texts are rhetorically designed in order to ensure maximum employee `buy-in'. Despite linguistic and rhetorical similarities among the texts, an exploration of context reveals startling differences in communicative purpose. In one case the Mission Statement emerges as an empowering historical vision to be protected and nurtured through all vicissitudes; in the other case, the rewriting of the Mission Statement emerges as a collaborative response to crisis. The article ends by discussing the implications of such findings for contemporary approaches to discourse and genre analysis within institutional linguistics.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2314098 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherBusiness Communicationen_US
dc.subject.otherCorporate Cultureen_US
dc.subject.otherDiscourse Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherGenre Studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherIdeologyen_US
dc.subject.otherMission Statementsen_US
dc.titleDiscourse and the Projection of Corporate Culture: The Mission Statementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIONen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67339/2/10.1177_0957926595006002005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0957926595006002005en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison, D. (1994) `Comments on Sarah Benesch's “ESL, Ideology and the Politics of Pragmatism” ', TESOL Quarterly28: 618-623.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakhtin, M.M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBass, B.M. (1981) Stodgill's Handbook of Leadership. New York: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazerman, C. (1992) `The Generic Performance of Ownership: The Patent Claim and Grant'. Paper presented at the `Re-thinking Genre' Seminar, Carleton University, Ottawa, April.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazerman, C. (1994) Constructing Experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenesch, S. (1993) `ESL, Ideology and the Politics of Pragmatism', TESOL Quarterly27: 705-717.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerenbeim, R.E. (1987) Corporate Ethics. New York: The Conference Board, Research Report No. 900.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R.L. and Herndl, C.G. (1986) `An Ethnographic Study of Corporate Writing: Job Status as Reflected in Written Text', in B. Couture (ed.) Functional Approaches to Writing—Research Perspectives, pp. 13-28. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheney, G. (1983) `The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication', Quarterly Journal of Speech69: 143-158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChin, E. (1994) `Redefining “Context” in Research on Writing', Written Communication11: 445-482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCressey, D.R. and Moore, C.A. (1983) `Managerial Values and Corporate Codes of Ethics', California Management Review25: 53-77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, G.A. (1994) `Ethnographic Research in Business and Technical Writing', Journal of Business and Technical Communication8: 118-134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCzarnaiawska-Joerges, B. and Joerges, B. (1988) `How to Control Things with Words: Organizational Talk and Control', Management Communication Quarterly2: 170-193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Beaugrande, R. (1993) `Discourse Analysis and Literary Theory: Closing the Gap', Journal of Advanced Composition13: 423-448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevitt, A. (1993) `Generalizing about Genre: New Conceptions of an Old Concept', College Composition and Communication44: 573-586.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoheny-Farina, S. (1986) `Writing in an Emerging Organization', Written Communication3: 158-185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutton, J.E. and Duncan, R.B. (1987a) `The Creation of Momentum for Change through the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis', Strategic Management Journal8: 279-295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutton, J.E. and Duncan, R.B. (1987b) `The Influence of the Strategic Planning Process on Strategic Change', Strategic Management Journal8: 103-116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, R. and Nohria, N. with Berkley, J.D. (1992) Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFairclough, N. (1992) `Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Textual Analysis within Discourse Analysis', Discourse & Society3: 193-218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFairhurst, G.T. (1993) `Echoes of the Vision: When the Rest of the Organization Talks Total Quality', Management Communication Quarterly6: 331-371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalbraith, J.K. (1985) The New Industrial State. 4th edn.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiddens, A. (1979) The Constitution of Society: Outlines of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoia, D.A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991) `Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation', Strategic Management Journal12: 433-448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanna, M.S. and Wilson, G.L. (1984) Communicating in Business and Professional Settings. New York: Random House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJudson, A.S. (1991) Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanter, R.M. (1991) `Championing Change: An Interview with Bell Atlantic CEO Raymond Smith', Harvard Business Review January-February: 118-130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKissler, G.D. (1991) The Change Riders: Managing the Power of Change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKress, G. (1985) `Socio-linguistic Development and the Mature Language User: Different Voices for Different Occasions', in G. Wells and J. Nichols (eds) Language and Learning: An Interactional Perspective, pp. 135-139. London: Falmer Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangelar, G.H. (1992) `The Vision Trap', Harvard Business Review March-April: 46-55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLatour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLengel, R.H. and Daft, R.L. (1988) `The Selection of Communicative Media as an Executive Skill', The Academy of Management Executive2: 225-232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevering, R., Moskowitz, M. and Katz, M., eds (1985) The 100 Best Companies to Work for in America. New York: New American Library.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLimerick, P.M. (1993) `Dancing with Professors: The Trouble with Academic Prose', New York Times Book Review 31 October.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, J.R. (1985) `Process and Text: Two Aspects of Human Semiosis', in J.D. Benson and W.S. Greaves (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, pp. 248-274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, J.R. (1993) `Genre and Literacy: Modeling Context in Educational Linguistics', Annual Review of Applied Linguistics XIII: 141-172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParadis, J., Dobrin, D. and Miller, R. (1985) `Writing at EXXON ITD: Notes on the Writing Environment of an R & D Organization', in L. Odell and D. Goswami (eds) Writing in Nonacademic Settings, pp. 281-307. New York: Guilford Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePennycook, A. (1994) `Incommensurable Discourses?', Applied Linguistics15: 115-138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, T.J. and Waterman, R.H. (1984) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-run Companies. New York: Warner Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitt, H.L. and Groskaufmanis, K.A. (1990) `Minimizing Corporate Civil and Criminal Liability: A Second Look at Corporate Codes of Conduct', The Georgetown Law Journal78: 1559-1654.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers, P.S. and Swales, J.M. (1990) `We the People? An Analysis of the Dana Corporation Policies Document', Jnl of Business Communication27: 293-313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRounds, P.L. (1987) `Multifunctional Personal Pronoun Use in an Educational Setting', English for Specific Purposes6: 13-29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchryer, C.F. (1993) `Records as Genre', Written Communication10: 200-234.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwales, J.M. (1993) `Genre and Engagement', Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire73: 687-698.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTichy, N.M. and Devanna, M.A. (1986) `The Transformational Leader', Training and Development Journal40: 27-32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyler, L. (1992) `Ecological Disaster and Rhetorical Response: Exxon's Communications in the Wake of the Valdez Spill', Journal of Business and Technical Communication6: 149-171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dijk, T.A. (1994a) `Editorial: The Discourses of “Bosnia” ', Discourse & Society5: 5-6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dijk, T.A. (1994b) `Editorial: Academic Nationalism', Discourse & Society5: 275-276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalter, O.M. (1966) Speaking to Inform and Persuade. New York: Mac Millan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeick, K. (1985) `Sources of Order in Underorganized Systems: Themes in Recent Organizational Theory', in Y.S. Lincoln, (ed.) Organizational Theory and Inquiry, pp. 106-136. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitte, S. (1992) `Context, Text and Intertext: Toward a Constructionist Semiotic of Writing', Written Communication9: 237-308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYates, J. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1992) `Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media', Academy of Management Review17: 299-326.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.