View Item 

Show simple item record

Treatment Teams that Work (and those that don't): An Application of Hackman's Group Effectiveness Model to Interdisciplinary Teams in Psychiatric Hospitals
dc.contributor.authorVinokur-Kaplan, Dianeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:23:33Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:23:33Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationVinokur-Kaplan, Diane (1995). "Treatment Teams that Work (and those that don't): An Application of Hackman's Group Effectiveness Model to Interdisciplinary Teams in Psychiatric Hospitals." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 31(3): 303-327. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67357>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67357
dc.description.abstractRecent studies of small work groups emphasize comprehensive models of team effectiveness. A survey-based operationalization of one such model, Hackman `s Model of Group Effectiveness (Hackman, 1987, 1990), is applied to 15 interdisciplinary treatment teams working in three public psychiatric hospitals. Mental health professionals answered a self-administered questionnaire I developed (N = 98, response rate = 91%). Analysis was conducted at three levels: (a) by all respondents; (b) by team; and (c) by organizational characteristics and professional discipline, and their interaction. Through use of a structural equation model, particular initial and enabling conditions successfully predict teams' meeting standards of the required task teams' cohesion, and members' personal well-being; standards met and cohesion of team also predict overall team effectiveness. These findings emphasize the importance of measuring the various types of organizational and group factors contributing to team effectiveness, as well as the specific aspects of team effectiveness. Implications for team training are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2643169 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleTreatment Teams that Work (and those that don't): An Application of Hackman's Group Effectiveness Model to Interdisciplinary Teams in Psychiatric Hospitalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67357/2/10.1177_0021886395313005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0021886395313005en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbramson, J. S. (1993). Orienting social work employees in interdisciplinary settings: Shaping professional and organizational perspectives. Social Work, 38(2), 152-157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlderfer, C. P. (1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 190-222). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAncona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Groups and Organizations, 13(4), 468-494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrews, F. M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey instruments: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409-442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmer, B., & Thomas, B. K. (1978). Attitudes toward interdisciplinary collaboration in pupil personnel service teams. Journal of School Psychology, 16(2), 167-176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P., & Conley, S. (1991). Work-home conflict among nurses and engineers: Mediating the impact of role stress on burnout and satisfaction at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 39-53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagozzi, R. P. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49-87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBond, G. R., Pensec, M., Dietzen, L., Mc Cafferty, D., Giemza, R., & Sipple, H. W. (1991). Intensive case management for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals in a large city: A comparison of team and individual caseloads. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 15(1), 90-98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBunker, B. B. (1992). From theory to practice: A review of recent books on small groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28(1), 137-155.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasto, R. M., Julia, M. C., Platt, L. J., Harbaugh, G. L., Thompson, A., Jost, T. S., Bope, E. T., Williams, T., & Lee, D. B. (1994). Interprofessional care and collaborative practice. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis-Sacks, M. L. (n.d.). [Treatment team study instruments used in the Battle Creek Initiative sponsored by the Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI]. Unpublished data and questionnaires.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDucanis, A. J., & Golin, A. K. (1979). The interdisciplinary health care team: A handbook. Germantown, MD: Aspen Systems.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEden, D. (1985). Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 94-100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarkas, A. J., & Tetrick, L. E. (1989). A three-wave longitudinal analysis of the causal ordering of satisfaction and commitment on turnover decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 855-868.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFolkins, C., Wieselberg, N., & Spensley, J. (1981). Discipline stereotyping and evaluative attitudes among community mental health center staff. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51(1), 140-148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarner, H. G. (1988). Helping others through teamwork. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaucher, E. J., & Coffey, R. J. (1993). Total quality in health care: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodman, P. S., Ravlin, E. C., & Argote, L. (1986). Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 1-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1986). An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(3), 410-418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarson, C. E, & La Fasto, F.M.J. (1989). Teamwork: What must go right, what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLecca, P. J., & Mc Neil, J. S. (Eds.). (1985a). Interdisciplinary team practice: Issues and trends. New York: Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLecca, P. J., & Mc Neil, J. S. (1985b). Issues and trends in team practice. In P. J. Lecca & J. S. Mc Neil (Eds.), Interdisciplinary team practice: Issues and trends (pp. 205-215). New York: Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiang, J., Lawrence, R. H., Bennett, J. M., & Whitelaw, N. A. (1990). Appropriateness of composites in structural equation models. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45(2), S53-S59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenberg, P. A., Strzepek, D. M., & Zeiss, A. M. (1990). Bringing psychiatric aides into the treatment team: An application of the Veterans Administration's ITTG Model. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 10(4), 63-73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLister, L. (1982). Role training for interdisciplinary health teams. Health & Social Work, 7(1), 19-25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNason, F. (1983). Diagnosing the hospital team. Social Work in Health Care, 9(2), 25-45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNetemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 148-157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: Some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging, 6(4), 499-503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRendell, R. (1988). Interdisciplinary collaboration, communication patterns and personality characteristics within milieu teams in a children's psychiatric hospital. Doctoral dissertation, School of Education, University of Michigan. (University Microfilms Order No. 8812972)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubroeck, J., Cotton, J. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1989). Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 35-58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShalinsky, W. (1989. Polydisciplinary group in the human services. Small Group Behavior, 20(2), 203-219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, R. B. (1990). Mental health treatment teams. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork (pp. 330-348). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1989). Physical environments and work-group effectiveness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 175-209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45(2), 120-133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117-153). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerem, E. (1991). Interdisciplinary teams and the control of clients: A sociotechnical perspective. Human Relations, 44(4), 343-356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToseland, R. W., Ivanoff, A., & Rose, S. R. (1987). Treatment conferences: Task groups in action. Social Work With Groups, 10(2), 80-94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToseland, R. W., Palmer-Ganeles, J., & Chapman, D. (1986). Teamwork in psychiatric settings. Social Work, 31(1), 46-52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrice, H. M. (1993). Occupational subcultures in the workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur-Kaplan, D. (1992). Final report: Pre- and post-training team building assessment (Report to the Michigan Department of Mental Health). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Social Work.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur-Kaplan, D. (1993). Integrating team effectiveness in social work practice: Some responses to disciplinary diversity. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur-Kaplan, D. (1995). Enhancing the effectiveness of interdisciplinary mental health treatment teams. Administration & Policy in Mental Health, 22(5), 521-530.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur-Kaplan, D. (in press). Integrating work team effectiveness with social work practice: An ecological approach. In D. J. Tucker, R. C. Sarri, & C. Garvin (Eds.), The integration of social work & social science. Westport, CT: Greenwood.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinokur-Kaplan, D., & Walker-Burt, G. (1994). Meeting professionals' training needs during retrenchment: An example of federal, state and university collaboration with public psychiatric hospitals. Administration & Policy in Mental Health, 21(6), 525-530.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalton, R. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0021886395313005.pdf
Size:
2.520MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.