Show simple item record

Morphometry of the Cranial Base in Subjects with Class III Malocclusion

dc.contributor.authorSingh, G. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, James A. Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLozanoff, Scotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:24:41Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:24:41Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationSingh, G.D.; McNamara, J.A.; Lozanoff, S. (1997). "Morphometry of the Cranial Base in Subjects with Class III Malocclusion." Journal of Dental Research 2(76): 694-703. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67377>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67377
dc.description.abstractThe significance of the cranial base in the development of Class III malocclusion remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the form of the cranial base differs between prepubertal Class I and Class III subjects. Lateral cephalographs of 73 children of European-American descent aged between 5 and 11 years with Class III malocclusion were compared with those of their counterparts with a normal, Class I molar occlusion. The cephalographs were traced, checked, and subdivided into seven age- and sex-matched groups. Average geometries, scaled to an equivalent size, were generated based on 13 craniofacial landmarks by means of Procrustes analysis, and these configurations were statistically tested for equivalence. Bivariate and multivariate analyses utilizing 5 linear and angular measurements were undertaken to corroborate the Procrustes analysis. Graphical analysis, utilizing thin-plate spline and finite element methods, was performed for localization of differences in cranial base morphology. Results indicated that cranial base morphology differed statistically for all age-wise comparisons. Graphical analysis revealed that the greatest differences in morphology occurred in the posterior cranial base region, which generally consisted of horizontal compression, vertical expansion, and size contraction. The sphenoidal region displayed expansion, while the anterior regions showed shearing and local increases in size. It is concluded that the shape of the cranial base differs in subjects with Class III malocclusion compared with the normal Class I configuration, due in part to deficient orthocephalization, or failure of the cranial base to flatten during development.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1065982 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherClass IIIen_US
dc.subject.otherCranial Baseen_US
dc.subject.otherMorphometryen_US
dc.subject.otherOrthocephalization.en_US
dc.titleMorphometry of the Cranial Base in Subjects with Class III Malocclusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Orthodontics & Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Dental Surgery & Periodontology, Dundee Dental Hospital & School, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee DD14HR, Scotland, UKen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology andof Surgery, John A. Bums School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96882en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67377/2/10.1177_00220345970760021101.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00220345970760021101en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson D., Popovich F. (1983). Relation of cranial base flexure to cranial form and madibular position. Am J Phys Anthropol 61:181-188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBattagel JM (1993). The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod 20:283-295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBattagel JM (1994). Predictors of relapse in orthodonticallytreated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod 21:1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBjork A. (1955). Cranial base development. Am J Orthod 41:198-255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBookstein FL (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurdi AR (1969). Cephalometric growth analysis of the human upper face region during the last two trimesters of gestation. Am J Anat 125:133-142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurdi AR, Lawton TJ, Grosslight J. (1988). Prenatal pattern emergence in early human facial development. Cleft Palate J 25:8-15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole SC (1988). Natural head position, posture and prognathism. Br J Orthod 15:227-239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietrich UC (1970). Morphological variability of skeletal Class III relationships as revealed by cephalometric analysis. Trans Eur Orthodont Soc 131-143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiewert VM (1983). A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses. Am J Anat 167:495-522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiewert VM (1985). Growth movements during prenatal development of human facial morphology. In: Normal and abnormal bone growth, progress in basic and clinical research. Dixon AD, Sarnat BG, editors. New York: Alan R. Liss, 187:57-66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis E., Mc Namara JA Jr (1984). Components of adult Class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:295-305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnlow DH, Moyers RE, Hunter WS, Nc Namara JA Jr (1969). A procedure for the analysis of intrinsic facial form and growth. Am J Orthod 56:6-23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord Ehr (1956). The growth of the foetal skull. J Anat 90:63-72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster TD, Day AJ (1974). A survey of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in a Shropshire school population. Br J Orthod 1:73-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge SL (1978). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of growth of the postnatal cranial base angle. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:171-178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGower JC (1975). Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, Mc Namara JA Jr, Behrents RG (1986). Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 56:7-30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaynes S. (1970). The prevalence of malocclusion in English children aged 11-12 years. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 89-98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA (1968). The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod 38:250-255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoyte DA (1975). A critical analysis of the growth in length of the cranial base. In: Morphogenesis and malformations of the face and brain. Bergsma D, editor. Birth defects: Orig Art Ser 11. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 255-282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoyte DA (1991). The cranial base in normal and abnormal skull growth. Neurosurg Clin North Am 2:515-537.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobson A., Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL (1974). Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 66:140-171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerr Wjs (1978). A method of superimposing serial lateral cephalometric films for the purpose of comparison: A preliminary report. Br J Orthod 5:51-53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerr WJ, Adams CP (1988). Cranial base and jaw relationship. Am J Phys Anthropol 77:213-220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang J. (1983). Clinical anatomy of the head. Berlin : Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLele S. (1993). Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean difference. Math Geol 25:573-602.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLestrel P., Roche AF (1986). Cranial base shape variation with age: A longitudinal study of shape using Fourier analysis. Hum Biol 58:527-540.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLestrel P., Bodt A., Swindler DR (1993). Longitudinal study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:117-129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis AB, Roche AF (1977). The saddle angle: Constancy or change? Angle Orthod 47:46-54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S., Diewert VM (1986). Measuring histological form change with finite element methods. Am J Anat 177:187-201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S., Diewert VM (1989). A computer graphics program for measuring two and three-dimensional form change in developing craniofacial cartilages using finite elements. Comp Biomed Res 22:63-82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S., Jureczek S., Feng T., Padwal R. (1994). Anterior cranial base morphology in mice with midfacial retrusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 31:417-428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W., Lozanoff S. (1996). Morphological deficiency in the prenatal anterior cranial base of midfacially retrognathic mice. J Anat (in press).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelsen B. (1972). Time and mode of closure of the sphenooccipital synchondrosis determined on human autopsy material. Acta Anat 83:112-118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelsen B. (1974). The cranial base. Acta Odontol Scand 32:62-73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOhtsuki F., Mukherjee D., Lewis AB, Roche AF (1982). A factor analysis of cranial base and vault dimensions in children. Am J Phys Anthropol 58:271-279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRead DW, Lestrel PE (1986). Comment on uses of homologous-point measures in systematics: A reply to Bookstein et al. Syst Zool 35:241-253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Lele S. (1992). Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol 21:283-305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohlf FJ (1996). Appendix II: Morphometric resources available on the Internet. In: Advances in morphometrics. Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. NATO ASI Series A. New York: Life Sciences 284, pp. 553-560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. TREE 8:129-132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohlf FJ, Slice D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40-59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanborn RT (1955). Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 25:208-222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSato S. (1994). Case report: Developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 64:105-112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott JH (1958). The cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 16:319-348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott JH (1967). Dento-facial development and growth. Oxford: Pergamon Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981). Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolow B., Tallgren A. (1976). Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 44:417-435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStapf WC (1948). A cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the facial pattern in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 18:20-23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarjanne I., Koski K. (1982). Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. Proc Finn Dent Soc 78:179-183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams S., Andersen CE (1986). The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod 89:302-311.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.