Show simple item record

Intergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overview

dc.contributor.authorWright, Deilen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:24:48Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:24:48Z
dc.date.issued1974en_US
dc.identifier.citationWright, Deil (1974). "Intergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overview." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 416(1): 1-16. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67379>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-7162en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67379
dc.description.abstractThe distinctive features of American intergov ernmental relations (IGR) are specified, and the last half-century of policy trends in the United States are viewed through the conceptual lens provided by the IGR perspective. Several distinctive features of IGR set it apart from the more commonplace term, federalism. These features include a multiplicity of units, the primacy of public officials' attitudes and actions, informal working patterns, the prominence of administrators, and a policy emphasis. Five phases of IGR form a matrix for classifying recent United States political developments. The phases are: (1) conflict, (2) cooperative, (3) concentrated, (4) creative, and (5) competitive. The chal lenges presented by the complexity and interdependencies of IGR point toward a management emphasis. Intergovern mental accomplishments appear to hinge on the successful management of complexity.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1052500 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleIntergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67379/2/10.1177_000271627441600102.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/000271627441600102en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scienceen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.