Intergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overview
dc.contributor.author | Wright, Deil | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T19:24:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T19:24:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1974 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Wright, Deil (1974). "Intergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overview." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 416(1): 1-16. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67379> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-7162 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67379 | |
dc.description.abstract | The distinctive features of American intergov ernmental relations (IGR) are specified, and the last half-century of policy trends in the United States are viewed through the conceptual lens provided by the IGR perspective. Several distinctive features of IGR set it apart from the more commonplace term, federalism. These features include a multiplicity of units, the primacy of public officials' attitudes and actions, informal working patterns, the prominence of administrators, and a policy emphasis. Five phases of IGR form a matrix for classifying recent United States political developments. The phases are: (1) conflict, (2) cooperative, (3) concentrated, (4) creative, and (5) competitive. The chal lenges presented by the complexity and interdependencies of IGR point toward a management emphasis. Intergovern mental accomplishments appear to hinge on the successful management of complexity. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1052500 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Intergovernmental Relations: an Analytical Overview | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67379/2/10.1177_000271627441600102.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/000271627441600102 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.