Show simple item record

A Quantitative Morphological Comparison of Cat Lingual Nerve Repair Using Epineurial Sutures or Entubulation

dc.contributor.authorHolland, G. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, K. G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLahl, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, P. P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPehowich, E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:28:54Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:28:54Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationHolland, G.R.; Andrade, D.; Smith, K.G.; Lahl, S.; Robinson, P.P.; Pehowich, E. (1996). "A Quantitative Morphological Comparison of Cat Lingual Nerve Repair Using Epineurial Sutures or Entubulation." Journal of Dental Research 3(75): 942-948. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67450>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67450
dc.description.abstractSince lingual nerves may be transected during a variety of oral surgical procedures, including third molar removal, we have investigated two possible methods of repair. Quantitative morphological observations were made on feline chorda tympani and lingual nerves proximal and distal to transection injuries repaired either by epineurial suturing or by insertion of the cut ends into a perforated silicon tube. Proximal to the repair, the most prominent difference was an increase in the number of myelinated axons in the lingual nerve following epineurial suturing but not entubulation. Proximal to the repair site, the number of non-myelinated axons increased in comparison with controls in both chorda tympani and lingual nerves after both procedures, though the difference was statistically significant only in the lingual nerve proximal to entubulation. Distal to the injury, both types of repair showed a reduction in the number, size, and sheath thickness of myelinated axons in comparison with unoperated controls, but the difference in numbers was statistically signficant only distal to repair by entubulation. The number of non-myelinated axons distal to the repair sites was much higher than that in controls, the difference being greater distal to entubulation repair. There were more axons per Remak bundle distal to entubulation repair than to epineurial suturing, suggesting, perhaps, that fewer axons would ultimately become myelinated. Though the morphological differences between the two repair techniques are not as striking as the parallel electrophysiological differences reported previously (Smith and Robinson, 1995a,b), they are consistent with them and support the conclusion that, for transected lingual and chorda tympani nerves, epineurial suturing is the preferred approach. Key words: lingual nerve, injury, oral surgery, taste.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1022627 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleA Quantitative Morphological Comparison of Cat Lingual Nerve Repair Using Epineurial Sutures or Entubulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, 1011 N. University, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, Englanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, Englanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canadaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67450/2/10.1177_00220345960750031201.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00220345960750031201en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken JT (1949). The effect of peripheral connexions on the maturation of regenerating nerve fibres. J Anat 83:32-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken JT, Thomas PK (1962). Retrograde changes in fibre size following nerve section. J Anat 96:121-129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshur H., Vilner Y., Finsterbush A., Rousso M., Weinberg H., Devor M. (1987). Extent of fiber regeneration after peripheral nerve repair: silicone splint vs. suture, gap repair vs. graft. Exp Neurol 97:365-374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeggs JL, Fischer DW, Shetter AG (1986). Comparative study of rat sciatic nerve microepineurial anastomoses made with carbon dioxide laser and suture techniques: Part 2. Neurosurg 18:266-269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlackburn CW, Bramley PA (1989). Lingual nerve damage associated with the removal of lower third molars. Br Dent J 167:103-107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCabaud HE, Rodkey WG, Mc Carroll HR Jr, Mutz SB, Niebauer JJ (1976). Epineurial and perineurial fascicular nerve repairs: A critical comparison. J Hand Surg 1:131-137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFields RD, Ellisman MH (1986). Axons regenerated through silicone tube splices. II. Functional morphology. Exp Neurol 92:61-74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFields RD, Le Beau JM, Longo FM, Ellisman MH (1989). Nerve regeneration through artificial tubular implants. Prog Neurobiol 33:87-134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibby WA, Koerber HR, Horch KW (1983). A quantitative evaluation of suture and tubulisation nerve repair techniques. J Neurosurg 58:574-579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland GR, Robinson PP (1990). The number and size of axons central and peripheral to inferior alveolar nerve injuries in the cat. J Anat 173:129-137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland GR, Robinson PP (1992). Axon populations in cat lingual and chorda tympani nerves. J Dent Res 71:1468-1472.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland GR, Robinson PP, Smith KG, Pehowich E. (1996). A quantitative morphological study of the recovery of cat lingual nerves after transection or crushing. J Anat 188:289-297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudson AR, Hunter D., Kline DG, Bratton BR (1979). Histological studies of experimental interfascicular graft repairs. J Neurosurg 51:333-340.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenq CB, Coggeshall RE (1985). Nerve regeneration through holey silicone tubes. Brain Res 361:233-241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubinska L. (1961). Demyelination and remyelination in the proximal parts of regenerated nerve fibers. J Comp Neurol 117:275-289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMason DA (1988). Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery. Int J Maxillofac Surg 17:290-294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayhew TM, Sharma AK (1984). Sampling schemes for estimating nerve fibre size. 1. Methods for nerve trunks of mixed fascicularity. J Anat 139:45-58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerle M., Dellon AL, Campbell JN, Chang PS (1989). Complications from silicon-polymer intubulation of nerves. Microsurg 10:130-133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris JH, Hudson AR, Weddell G. (1972). A study of degeneration and regeneration in the divided sciatic nerve based on electron micrscopy. IV. Changes in fascicular microtopography, perineurium and endoneurial fibroblasts. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 124:165-203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgel MG, Terzis JK (1977). Epineurial vs. perineurial repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 60:80-91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson PP (1989). The reinnervation of the tongue and salivary glands after lingual nerve injuries in cats. Brain Res 483:259-271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson PP (1992). The effect of injury on the properties of afferent fibres in the lingual nerve. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:39-45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen JM, Pham HN, Hentz VR (1989). Fascicular tubulization: a comparison of experimental nerve repair techniques in the cat. Ann Plast Surg 22:467-478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanders FK (1948). The thickness of the myelin sheaths of normal and regenerating peripheral nerve fibres. Proc R Soc Lond 135(B):323-357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith KG, Robinson PP (1995a). The reinnervation of the tongue and salivary glands after two methods of lingual nerve repair in the cat. Arch Oral Biol 40:373-383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith KG, Robinson PP (1995b). An experimental study of lingual nerve repair using epineurial suture or entubulation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33: 211-219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Arx DP, Simpson MT (1989). The effect of dexamethasone on neuropraxia following third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:477-480.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.