View Item 

Show simple item record

Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Laura W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeisels, Samuel J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:43:49Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:43:49Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.citationHenderson, Laura; Meisels, Samuel (1994). "Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children." Journal of Early Intervention 2(18): 141-154. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67704>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67704
dc.description.abstractBecause multiple risk factors can influence child development, methods designed to screen young children for developmental problems should incorporate information from various sources in order to cover all potential areas of delay effectively. In this study we combined results from a standardized parent questionnaire with those of an individually administered developmental screening instrument (the Early Screening Inventory) in order to predict more accurately which children will be at risk for school failure. Our results show a decrease in misclassifications after combining the parent measure with the screening instrument, thus increasing the predictive accuracy of the developmental screening process. Implications of our findings are discussed within the context of screening from a perspective of multiple risks and multiple sources of input.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1910568 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleParental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGeorgia Department of Educationen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67704/2/10.1177_105381519401800203.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/105381519401800203en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlpern, G.D., Boll, T.J., & Shearer, M. (1980). The Developmental Profile II. Aspen, CO: Psychological Development and Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagnato, S.J., & Neisworth, J.T. (1991). Assessment for early intervention: Best practices for professionals. New York: Guilford Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes, K.E. (1982). Preschool screening: The measurement and prediction of children at-risk. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckman, P.J. (1984). Perceptions of young children with handicaps: A comparison of mothers and program staff. Mental Retardation, 22, 176–181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlacher-Dixon, J., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1981). Consistency and correspondence of mothers‘ and teachers’ assessments of young handicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 3, 64–71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBricker, D., & Squires, J. (1989a). A low-cost system using parents to monitor the development of at-risk infants. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 50–60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBricker, D., & Squires, J. (1989b). The effectiveness of screening at-risk infants: Infant Monitoring Questionnaires. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9, 67–85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBricker, D. Squires, J., Kaminski, R., & Mounts, L. (1988). The validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed questionnaire system to evaluate at-risk infants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13, 55–68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgess, D.B., Asher, K.N., Doucet, H.J., Reardon, K., & Daste, M.R. (1984). Parent report as a means of administering the Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire: An evaluation study. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 5, 195–200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne, J.M., Backman, J.E., & Smith, I.M. (1986). Developmental assessment: The clinical use and validity of parental report. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 549–559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDean, R.S., & Steffen, J.E. (1984). Direct and indirect pediatric screening measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 65–75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiamond, K.E. (1987). Predicting school problems from preschool developmental screening: A four-year follow-up of the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test and the role of parent report. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 247–253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenburg, W.K. (1985). The Denver approach to early case finding: A review of the Denver Developmental Screening Test and a brief training program in developmental diagnosis. In W.K. Frankenburg, R.N. Emde, & J.W. Sullivan (Eds.), Early identification of children at-risk: An international perspective (pp. 135–158). New York: Plenum Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenburg, W.K., & Dodds, J.B. (1967). The Denver Developmental Screening Test. Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 181–191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenburg, W.K., Fandal, A.W., & Thornton, F.M. (1987). Revision of Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. The Journal of Pediatrics, 110, 653–657.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenburg, W.K., van Doominck, W.J., Liddell, T.N., & Dick, N.P. (1976). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics, 57, 744–753.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242–252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlascoe, F.P. (1991). Can clinical judgment detect children with speech-language problems?. Pediatrics, 87, 317–322.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGottfried, A.W., Guerin, D., Spencer, J.E., & Meyer, C. (1984). Validity of MCDI in screening young children's developmental status. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 219–230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuerin, D., & Gottfried, A.W. (1987). MDI Inventories: Predictors of intelligence, achievement, and adaptability. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 595–609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIreton, H., & Thwing, E. (1974). The Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: Behavior Science Systems, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIreton, H., Thwing, E., & Currier, S. (1977). Minnesota Child Development Inventory: Identification of children with developmental disorders. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2, 18–22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaufman, A.S. (1982). An integrated review of almost a decade of research on the Mc Carthy Scales. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (vol. 2, pp. 119–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenstein, R. (1984). Predicting school performance of preschool children from parent reports. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 79–94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichtenstein, R., & Ireton, H. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Carthy, D. (1972). The Mc Carthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: Psychological Corporation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1988). Developmental screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 527–550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1989). Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at-risk?. Pediatrics, 83, 578–585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., Henderson, L.W., Liaw, F., Browning, K., & Ten Have, T. (1993). New evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Screening Inventory. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 327–346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Provence, S. (1989). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Washington, DC: National Center for Clinical Infant Programs.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Shonkoff, J.P. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of early childhood intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Wasik, B.A. (1990). Who should be served? Identifying children in need of early intervention. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 605–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Wiske, M.S. (1983). The Early Screening Inventory. New York: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., Wiske, M.S., Henderson, L.W., Marsden, D.B., & Browning, K. (1992). The Early Screening Inventory (Revised ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, L.J., & Sprong, T.A. (1986). Psychometric and qualitative comparison of four preschool screening instruments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 480–484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, J. (1985). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 452–453). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRysberg, J.A. (1985). The Minnesota Child Development Inventory. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 991–992). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSameroff, A.J., Seifer, R., Barocas, B., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). IQ scores of 4-year-old children: Social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343–350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaylor, C.F., & Brandt, B.J. (1986). The MCDI: A valid maternal-report form for assessing development in infancy. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 308–311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchafer, P.S., Bell, A.P., & Spalding, J.B. (1987). Parental versus professional assessment of developmentally delayed children after periods of parent training. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 47–55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheehan, R. (1988). Involvement of parents in early childhood assessment. In T.D. Wachs & R. Sheehan (Eds.). Assessment of young developmentally disabled children (pp. 75–90). New York: Plenum Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShelton, T.L. (1989). The assessment of cognition/intelligence in infancy. Infants and Young Children, 1, 10–25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShonkoff, J.P. & Meisels, S.J. (1990). Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 3–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSquires, J., & Bricker, D. (1991). Impact of completing infant developmental questionnaires on at-risk mothers. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 162–172.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_105381519401800203.pdf
Size:
1.822MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.