Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children
dc.contributor.author | Henderson, Laura W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Meisels, Samuel J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T19:43:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T19:43:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Henderson, Laura; Meisels, Samuel (1994). "Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children." Journal of Early Intervention 2(18): 141-154. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67704> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-8151 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67704 | |
dc.description.abstract | Because multiple risk factors can influence child development, methods designed to screen young children for developmental problems should incorporate information from various sources in order to cover all potential areas of delay effectively. In this study we combined results from a standardized parent questionnaire with those of an individually administered developmental screening instrument (the Early Screening Inventory) in order to predict more accurately which children will be at risk for school failure. Our results show a decrease in misclassifications after combining the parent measure with the screening instrument, thus increasing the predictive accuracy of the developmental screening process. Implications of our findings are discussed within the context of screening from a perspective of multiple risks and multiple sources of input. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1910568 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Georgia Department of Education | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67704/2/10.1177_105381519401800203.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/105381519401800203 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alpern, G.D., Boll, T.J., & Shearer, M. (1980). The Developmental Profile II. Aspen, CO: Psychological Development and Publications. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bagnato, S.J., & Neisworth, J.T. (1991). Assessment for early intervention: Best practices for professionals. New York: Guilford Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Barnes, K.E. (1982). Preschool screening: The measurement and prediction of children at-risk. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beckman, P.J. (1984). Perceptions of young children with handicaps: A comparison of mothers and program staff. Mental Retardation, 22, 176–181. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Blacher-Dixon, J., & Simeonsson, R.J. (1981). Consistency and correspondence of mothers‘ and teachers’ assessments of young handicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 3, 64–71. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (1989a). A low-cost system using parents to monitor the development of at-risk infants. Journal of Early Intervention, 13, 50–60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bricker, D., & Squires, J. (1989b). The effectiveness of screening at-risk infants: Infant Monitoring Questionnaires. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 9, 67–85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bricker, D. Squires, J., Kaminski, R., & Mounts, L. (1988). The validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed questionnaire system to evaluate at-risk infants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13, 55–68. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Burgess, D.B., Asher, K.N., Doucet, H.J., Reardon, K., & Daste, M.R. (1984). Parent report as a means of administering the Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire: An evaluation study. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 5, 195–200. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Byrne, J.M., Backman, J.E., & Smith, I.M. (1986). Developmental assessment: The clinical use and validity of parental report. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 549–559. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dean, R.S., & Steffen, J.E. (1984). Direct and indirect pediatric screening measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 65–75. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Diamond, K.E. (1987). Predicting school problems from preschool developmental screening: A four-year follow-up of the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test and the role of parent report. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 247–253. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frankenburg, W.K. (1985). The Denver approach to early case finding: A review of the Denver Developmental Screening Test and a brief training program in developmental diagnosis. In W.K. Frankenburg, R.N. Emde, & J.W. Sullivan (Eds.), Early identification of children at-risk: An international perspective (pp. 135–158). New York: Plenum Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frankenburg, W.K., & Dodds, J.B. (1967). The Denver Developmental Screening Test. Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 181–191. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frankenburg, W.K., Fandal, A.W., & Thornton, F.M. (1987). Revision of Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. The Journal of Pediatrics, 110, 653–657. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frankenburg, W.K., van Doominck, W.J., Liddell, T.N., & Dick, N.P. (1976). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (PDQ). Pediatrics, 57, 744–753. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242–252. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Glascoe, F.P. (1991). Can clinical judgment detect children with speech-language problems?. Pediatrics, 87, 317–322. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gottfried, A.W., Guerin, D., Spencer, J.E., & Meyer, C. (1984). Validity of MCDI in screening young children's developmental status. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 9, 219–230. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guerin, D., & Gottfried, A.W. (1987). MDI Inventories: Predictors of intelligence, achievement, and adaptability. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 595–609. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ireton, H., & Thwing, E. (1974). The Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: Behavior Science Systems, Inc. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ireton, H., Thwing, E., & Currier, S. (1977). Minnesota Child Development Inventory: Identification of children with developmental disorders. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2, 18–22. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaufman, A.S. (1982). An integrated review of almost a decade of research on the Mc Carthy Scales. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (vol. 2, pp. 119–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lichtenstein, R. (1984). Predicting school performance of preschool children from parent reports. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 79–94. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lichtenstein, R., & Ireton, H. (1984). Preschool screening: Identifying young children with developmental and educational problems. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, Inc. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mc Carthy, D. (1972). The Mc Carthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: Psychological Corporation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J. (1988). Developmental screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy. Annual Review of Public Health, 9, 527–550. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J. (1989). Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at-risk?. Pediatrics, 83, 578–585. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., Henderson, L.W., Liaw, F., Browning, K., & Ten Have, T. (1993). New evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Screening Inventory. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 327–346. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., & Provence, S. (1989). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Washington, DC: National Center for Clinical Infant Programs. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., & Shonkoff, J.P. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of early childhood intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., & Wasik, B.A. (1990). Who should be served? Identifying children in need of early intervention. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 605–632). New York: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., & Wiske, M.S. (1983). The Early Screening Inventory. New York: Teachers College Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meisels, S.J., Wiske, M.S., Henderson, L.W., Marsden, D.B., & Browning, K. (1992). The Early Screening Inventory (Revised ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, L.J., & Sprong, T.A. (1986). Psychometric and qualitative comparison of four preschool screening instruments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 480–484. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mitchell, J. (1985). The Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 452–453). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rysberg, J.A. (1985). The Minnesota Child Development Inventory. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 991–992). Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sameroff, A.J., Seifer, R., Barocas, B., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). IQ scores of 4-year-old children: Social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343–350. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Saylor, C.F., & Brandt, B.J. (1986). The MCDI: A valid maternal-report form for assessing development in infancy. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 308–311. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schafer, P.S., Bell, A.P., & Spalding, J.B. (1987). Parental versus professional assessment of developmentally delayed children after periods of parent training. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 47–55. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sheehan, R. (1988). Involvement of parents in early childhood assessment. In T.D. Wachs & R. Sheehan (Eds.). Assessment of young developmentally disabled children (pp. 75–90). New York: Plenum Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shelton, T.L. (1989). The assessment of cognition/intelligence in infancy. Infants and Young Children, 1, 10–25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shonkoff, J.P. & Meisels, S.J. (1990). Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 3–31). New York: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (1991). Impact of completing infant developmental questionnaires on at-risk mothers. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 162–172. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.