Show simple item record

The Courtship Process and Adolescent Sexuality

dc.contributor.authorThornton, Arlanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:44:17Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:44:17Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationTHORNTON, ARLAND (1990). "The Courtship Process and Adolescent Sexuality." Journal of Family Issues 3(11): 239-273. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67712>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-513Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67712
dc.description.abstractThis article examines adolescent sexuality within the context of a life course developmental model and considers the causal interrelationships of sexual behavior with dating, courtship, and planning for marriage. Data from a sample of 18-year-old men and women document the importance of dating and courtship development on the initiation of intimate heterosexual relations. Young people who begin to date at an early age also tend to develop steady relationships relatively early and continue to date more frequently. Both the timing of the initiation of dating and the development of steady dating relationships have substantial implications for the development of sexual relations. Young women and men who begin dating early and who develop steady relations early are more likely to be sexually experienced, to have had sexual relations with more partners, to be more sexually active during their late teenage years, and to have more permissive attitudes concerning premarital sex. Among those who experience sexual intercourse, those who had their first experience at a relatively young age had the most partners and had intercourse more frequently when they were 18.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2841243 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.titleThe Courtship Process and Adolescent Sexualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67712/2/10.1177_019251390011003002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/019251390011003002en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachrach, C. A., & Horn, M. C. (1985). Marriage and first intercourse, marital dissolution, and remarriage: United States, 1982 (Vital and Health Statistics of the National Center for Health Statistics No. 107). Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChilman, C. S. (1980). Toward a reconceptualization of adolescent sexuality. In C. S. Chilman (Ed.), Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedman, D., Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1980). Maintaining response rates in longitudinal studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 9, 87-98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGagnon, J. H. (1977). Human sexualities. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, B. C., Mc Coy, J. K., & Olson, T. D. (1986). Dating age and stage as correlates of adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 367-371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpinion Roundup. (1982). Public Opinion, 5, 30-36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 3, 86-109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReiss, I. L. (1960). Premarital sexual standards in America. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26, 188-198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReiss, I. L., & Miller, B. C. (1979). Heterosexual permissiveness: A theoretical analysis. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (pp. 57-100). New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873-894.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThornton, A., & Freedman, D. (1983). The changing American family. Population Bulletin, 38, 1-42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThornton, A., Freedman, D., & Camburn, D. (1982). Obtaining respondent cooperation in family panel studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 35-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUdry, J. R. (1988). Biological predispositions and social control in adolescent sexual behavior. American Sociological Review, 53, 709-722.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUdry, J. R., Talbert, L. M., & Morris, N. M. (1986). Biosocial foundations for adolescent female sexuality. Demography, 23, 217-230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZelnik, M., Kantner, J. F., & Ford, K. (1981). Sex and pregnancy in adolescence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.