Show simple item record

Dimensions of Early Identification

dc.contributor.authorMeisels, Samuel J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:54:14Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:54:14Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.citationMEISELS, SAMUEL (1991). "Dimensions of Early Identification." Journal of Early Intervention 1(15): 26-35. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67883>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67883
dc.description.abstractSeveral dimensions of early identification are discussed, including the relationship between early identification and prevention. A preventive component is described for the various forms of early identification—child find, screening, assessment, and program planning. Also discussed are recently published guidelines for screening and assessment and the assumptions on which these guidelines are based. Chief among these assumptions is the notion that risk and disability are multidetermined; hence, systems of early identification must similarly be founded on a multiple risk model. The implications of this model for selecting assessment instruments and for determining eligibility are described, as are future directions that should be explored in early identification.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1349490 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleDimensions of Early Identificationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67883/2/10.1177_105381519101500105.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/105381519101500105en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagnato, S., Neisworth, J., & Munson, S.M. (1989). Linking developmental assessment and early intervention: Curriculum-based prescriptions (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, G.W. (1982). Standard deviation, standard error—which ‘standard’ should we use?. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 136, 937–943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, S.K., Siegel, E., Parr, C.A., & Ramey, C. T. (1986). Evidence for the need to renorm the Bayley Scales of Infant Development based on the performance of a population-based sample of 12-month-old infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6(2), 83–96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunst, C.J., & Trivette, C.M. (1990). Assessment of social support in intervention programs. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 328–351). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDworkin, P.H. (1989). Developmental screening: Expecting the impossible?. Pediatrics, 83, 619–622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagan, J.F., Singer, L. T., Montie, J.E., & Shepherd, P.A. (1986). Selective screening device for the early detection of normal or delayed cognitive development in infants at risk for later mental retardation. Pediatrics, 78, 1021–1026.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenburg, W.K., Dodds, J., Fandal, A., Kazuk, E., & Cohrs, M. (1975). Denver Developmental Screening Test. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Center.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, M.A., & Scott, K.G. (1988). The impact of definitions of high risk on services to infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, 23–38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarbin, G.L., Terry, D., & Daguio, C. (1989). Status of the states' progress toward developing a definition for developmentally delayed as required by P.L. 99–457, Part H. Unpublished manuscript. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Policy Studies Program.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKochanek, T. T., & Friedman, D.H. (1988). Incorporating family assessment and Individualized Family Service Plans into early intervention programs: A developmental decision making process. Unpublished manuscript. Providence: Rhode Island College.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKochanek, T. T., Kabacoff, R.I., & Lipsitt, L.P. (1987). Early detection of handicapping conditions in infancy and early childhood: Toward a multivariate model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 8, 411–420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Call, R.B. (1982). A hard look at stimulating and predicting development: The cases of bonding and screening. Pediatrics in Review, 3, 205–212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1987). Uses and abuses of developmental screening and school readiness testing. Young Children, 42, 4–6; 68–73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1988). Developmental screening in early childhood: The interaction of research and social policy. In L. Breslow, J.E. Fielding, & L.B. Lave (Eds.), Annual review of public health (Vol. 9, pp. 527–550). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1989a). Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at-risk?. Pediatrics, 83, 578–585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J. (1989b). Meeting the mandate of Public Law 99–457: Early intervention in the nineties. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 451–460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Margolis, L.H. (1988). Is EPSDT effective with developmentally disabled children?. Pediatrics, 81, 262–271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Provence, S. (1989). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Washington, DC: National Center for Clinicial Infant Programs.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisels, S.J., & Wasik, B.A. (1990). Who should be served? Identifying children in need of early intervention. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 605–632). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, S.K., Bee, H.L., Hammond, M.A., & Barnard, K.E. (1985). Prediction of school and behavior problems in children followed from birth to age eight. In W.K. Frankenburg, R.N. Emde, & J.W. Sullivan (Eds.), Early identification of children at risk (pp. 117–132). New York: Plenum Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSameroff, A.J., & Fiese, B.H. (1990). Transactional regulation and early intervention. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 119–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSameroff, A.J., Seifer, R., Barocas, R., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: Social-emotional risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343–350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShonkoff, J.P., & Meisels, S.J. (1990). Early childhood intervention: The evolution of a concept. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWachs, T.D., & Sheehan, R. (Eds.). (1988). Assessment of young developmentally disabled children. New York: Plenum Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner, E.E. (1986). A longitudinal study of perinatal risk. In D.C. Farran & J.D. Mc Kinney (Eds.), Risk in intellectual and psychosocial development (pp. 3–28). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.