Show simple item record

System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers

dc.contributor.authorHuth, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBennett, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGelpi, Christopheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:55:34Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:55:34Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationHuth, Paul; Bennett, D.; Gelpi, Christopher (1992). "System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powers." Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(3): 478-517. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67906>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67906
dc.description.abstractThe authors investigate the relationship between system structure and the initiation of militarized disputes among Great Powers. The central hypotheses concern the interaction between system uncertainty and the risk propensity of national decision makers. The authors employ a research design that enables them to incorporate explanatory variables from various levels of analysis into their theoretical model. The model is tested by probit analysis on a pooled time series of Great Power rival dyads from 1816 to 1975. The empirical results support the central hypothesis that the effects of the international system are mediated by the risk propensity of decision makers. In addition, the authors find that dyadic- and unit-level variables such as arms races, power transitions, and the current and past dispute behavior of rivals also have significant effects on conflict behavior. Finally, the results indicate that nuclear weapons do not seem to have a systematic impact on the initiation of militarized disputes among Great Powers.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent3545633 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleSystem Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict among the Great Powersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67906/2/10.1177_0022002792036003004.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022002792036003004en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Conflict Resolutionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAchen, Christopher H. 1986. The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdamthwaite, Anthony P. 1977. The making of the second world war. London: Allen & Unwin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrecht-Carrie, Rene. 1958. A diplomatic history of Europe since the Congress of Vienna. New York: Harper & Row.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, Paul, and Timothy Mc Keown. 1987. Changing aspirations, limited attention, and war. World Politics40:1-29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrecher, Michael, Patrick James, and Jonathan Wilkenfeld. 1990. Polarity and stability: New concepts, indicators and evidence. International Interactions16(1): 49-80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1975. Measuring systemic polarity. Journal of Conflict Resolution19:187-216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1978. Systemic polarization and the occurrence and duration of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution22:241-267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981a. The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981b. Risk, power distributions, and the likelihood of war. International Studies Quarterly25:541-568.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1985a. Toward a scientific understanding of international conflict. International Studies Quarterly29:121-136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1985b. The war trap revisited. American Political Science Review79 (1): 156-173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and David Lalman. 1988. Empirical support for systemic and dyadic explanations of international conflict. World Politics41:1-20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarr, Edward Hallet. 1953. The Bolshevik Revolution 1917-1923. New York: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeutsch, Karl W., and J. David Singer. 1964. Multipower systems and international stability. World Politics16:390-406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, Paul. 1985. Arms races to war: Testing some empirical linkages. The Sociological Quarterly26:331-349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDomke, William K. 1988. War and the changing global system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoran, Charles, and Wes Parsons. 1980. War and the cycle of relative power. American Political Science Review74:947-965.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaddis, John Lewis. 1986. The long peace. International Security10(4): 99-142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller, Daniel. 1990. Nuclear weapons, deterrence, and crisis escalation. Journal of Conflict Resolution34:291-310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGochman, Charles, and Zeev Maoz. 1984. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution28:586-615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouweling, Hank, and Jan Siccama. 1988. Power transitions as a cause of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution32:87-102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuth, Paul. 1988. Extended deterrence and the prevention of war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuth, Paul. 1990. The extended deterrent value of nuclear weapons. Journal of Conflict Resolution34:270-290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuth, Paul, and Bruce Russett. 1988. Deterrence failure and crisis escalation. International Studies Quarterly32:29-45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJames, Patrick. 1988. Crisis and war. Montreal, Canada: Mc Gill-Queens Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47:263-291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennan, George F. 1958. The decision to intervene. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, Woosang, 1989. Power, alliances, and major wars, 1816-1975. Journal of Conflict Resolution33:255-273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKugler, Jacek. 1984. Terror without deterrence: Reassessing the role of nuclear weapons. Journal of Conflict Resolution28:470-506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKugler, Jacek, and A.F.K. Organski. 1989. The power transition: A retrospective and prospective evaluation. In Handbook of War Studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, 171-194. Boston: Unwin Hyman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger, William J. 1935. The diplomacy of imperialism 2 vols. New York: Knopf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger, William J. 1952. An encyclopedia of world history. Boston: Houghton and Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeng, Russell. 1983. When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution27:379-419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1981. Alliance formation and war behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution25:581-614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1983. War in the modern great power system, 1495-1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1985. The polarity of the system and international stability: An empirical analysis. In Polarity and war, edited by Alan Sabrosky, 41-66. Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1987. Declining power and the preventive motivation for war. World Politics40:82-107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1988. Domestic politics and war. Journal of Interdisciplinary History18:653-673.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy, Jack S. 1989. The diversionary theory of war: A critique. In Handbook of war studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, 259-288. Boston: Unwin Hyman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuce, R. D., and Henry Raiffa. 1957. Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks, Sally. 1976. The illusion of peace: International relations in Europe, 1918-1933.. New York: St. Martin's.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Quitty, L. 1957. Elementary linkage analysis for isolating both orthogonal types and typal relevancies. Educational and Psychological Measurement17:202-229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMearsheimer, John. 1983. Conventional deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMearsheimer, John. 1990. Back to the future of Europe: instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security15 (1): 5-56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMidlarsky, Manus. 1974. Power, uncertainty and the onset of international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution18:395-431.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, Brian. 1980. European historical statistics, 1750-1975. 2d rev. ed.New York: Facts on File.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, Brian. 1982. International historical statistics: Africa and Asia. New York: New York University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrow, James. 1987. On the theoretical basis of a measure of national risk attitudes. International Studies Quarterly31:423-438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrow, James. 1989. Effects of arms races on the occurrence of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution33:500-529.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMowatt, R. B. 1927. A history of European diplomacy, 1815-1914. London: Edward Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrganski, A.F.K., and Jacek Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOren, Ido. 1990. The war proneness of alliances. Journal of Conflict Resolution34:208-233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstrom, Charles, and John Aldrich. 1978. The relationship between size and stability in the major power system. American Journal of Political Science22:743-771.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, R.A.C. 1969. Europe 1919-1945. London: Weidensfield & Nicolson.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuattrone, George, and Amos Tversky. 1988. Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review82:719-736.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRussett, Bruce. 1990. Controlling the sword: The democratic governance of national security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, J. David. 1989. System structure, decision processes, and the incidence of international war. In Handbook of war studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, 1-21. Boston: Unwin Hyman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, J. David, S. Bremer, and J. Stuckey. 1972. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war. In Peace, war and numbers, edited by Bruce M. Russett, 19-48. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, J. David, and Melvin Small. 1966. Formal alliances, 1815-1939. Journal of Peace Research3:1-32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger, J. David and Melvin Small.. 1969. Formal alliances 1815-1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research6:257-282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiverson, Randolph M., and Paul F. Diehl. 1989. Arms races, the conflict spiral and the onset of war. In Handbook of War Studies, edited by Manus I. Midlarsky, 195-218. Boston: Unwin Hyman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiverson, Randolph M., and Michael R. Tennefoss. 1984. Power, alliance, and the escalation of international conflict, 1815-1965. American Political Science Review78:1057-1069.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall, Melvin, and J. David Singer. 1982. Resort to arms. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiezio, K. Edward. 1990. British hegemony and major power war, 1815-1939. International Studies Quarterly34:165-182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, A.J.P. 1954. The struggle for mastery in Europe, 1848-1918. London: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, A.J.P. 1961. The origins of the second world war. London: Hamish Hamilton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, William. 1986. Polarity, the long cycle, and global power warfare. Journal of Conflict Resolution30:587-616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVincent, Jack. 1981. Internal and external conflict: Some previous operational problems and some new findings. Journal of Politics43:107-135.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace, Michael. 1985. Polarization: Towards a scientific conception. In Polarity and war, edited by Alan Sabrosky, 95-113. Boulder, CO: Westview.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalt, Stephen. 1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaltz, Kenneth N. 1964. The stability of a bipolar world. Daedalus93:881-909.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaltz, Kenneth N. 1990. Nuclear myths and political realities. American Political Science Review84:731-746.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWayman, Frank Whelon. 1984. Bipolarity and war: The role of capability concentration among major powers, 1816-1965. Journal of Peace Research21, 1:61-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeede, Erich. 1983. Extended deterrence by superpower alliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution27:231-254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYates, J. Frank. 1990. Judgement and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.