Show simple item record

Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Organization Development

dc.contributor.authorFranklin, Jeromeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T19:58:13Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T19:58:13Z
dc.date.issued1976en_US
dc.identifier.citationFranklin, Jerome (1976). "Characteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Organization Development." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 12(4): 471-492. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67951>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/67951
dc.description.abstractA comparison between 11 organizations with successful OD efforts and 14 organizations with unsuccessful efforts reveals characteristics identifiable with each category. Eight major clusters of characteristics served as the foci for the comparison: 1) the organization's environment, 2) the organization itself, 3) initial contact for the OD projects, 4) formal entry procedures and commitment, 5) data-gathering activities, 6) internal and 7) external changeagent characteristics, and 8) exit procedures. Results indicated an absence of single dimensions that are either essential or sufficient to distinguish between the successful and unsuccessful organizations. Three general areas, however, did serve to differentiate organizations in the two categories: 1. Organizations that are more open to and involved in adjusting to change are more likely to be successful in their OD effort than are those that are more stable and status-quo oriented. 2. Internal change agents who are more carefully selected, did not receive training prior to the current OD efforts, and who possess assessment-prescriptive skills are most evident in the successful organizations. 3. More specific interest in and greater commitment to the OD projects are associated with successful change. Implications for managers and consultants interested in applying these findings to increase the likelihood of success in OD projects are explored, with consideration given to the importance and alterability of each characteristic.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1923828 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleCharacteristics of Successful and Unsuccessful Organization Developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67951/2/10.1177_002188637601200402.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/002188637601200402en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArgyris, C. Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowers, D.C. Development techniques and organizational change: An overview of results Irom the Michigan Inter-Company Longitudinal Study. Technical Report to the Office of Naval Research, 1971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowers, D).G. OD techniques and their results in 23 organizations: The Michigan ICL Study. Journal oa Applied Behavioral Science, 1973, 9 (1), 21-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowers, D.G., Franklin, J.L. & Pecorella, P.A. Matching problems, precursors and interventions in OD: A systemic approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1975, 11 (4), 391-409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan, P.C. Crucial issues in organizational development. In H.A. Hornstein, B.B. Bunker, W.W. Burke, Ml. Gindes, & R. Lewicki (Lds.), Social intervention. New York: the Free Press, 1971. Pp. 386-400.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedlander, F., & Brown, L.D. Organization development. Annual Review of Psychology, 1974, 25. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews. Pp. 313-341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGireiner, L.E. Patterns of organization change. Harvard Business Rezview, May-June 1966, Pp. 119-130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHulin, C.L., & Blood, M.R. Job enlargement, individual differences, and worker responses. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69 (1). 41-55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahn, R.L. Organizational development: Some problems and proposals. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974, 10 (4), 485-502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel, S. A Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: MNCirawss-Hill 1956.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteele, F. Consulting for organizational change. Mherst, Mlass.: Uiniversity of Mlassachusetts Press, 1977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, J.C.., & Bowers, D.G. The Surv'ey of Organizations. Ann Arbor, lich.: Institute fsr Social Research, 1972.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTichy, N.M. Agents of planned social change. Administrative Science Quarterly 1974, 19 (2), 164-182.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.