View Item 

Show simple item record

Social Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversies
dc.contributor.authorMizruchi, Mark S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T20:02:25Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T20:02:25Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.citationMizruchi, Mark (1994). "Social Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversies." Acta Sociologica 37(4): 329-343. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68023>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6993en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68023
dc.description.abstractNetwork analysis has grown rapidly over the past two decades, but criticisms of the approach have increased as well This article focuses on several accomplishments and unresolved problems of the network approach In the first section. I illustrate the value of the network model in several substantive areas. focusing on studies of centrahty and power, network subgroups, and interorganizational relations I then discuss three issues over which the approach has provoked controversy the relation between network analysis and rational choice theory; the role of norms and culture, and the question of human agency I conclude with some examples of how network theorists are addressing these problemsen_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent975776 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleSocial Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Sociology, University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68023/2/10.1177_000169939403700403.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/000169939403700403en_US
dc.identifier.sourceActa Sociologicaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlba, R.D. 1973 A Graph-Theorctic Detinition of a Sociometric Clique Journal of Mathemattcal Sociology 3, 113-126en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, M.P. 1978 Economic Interest Groups and the Corporate Elite Structure Social Science Quarterly 58, 597-615en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAstley, W.G. & Zajac, E.J. 1990 Beyond Dyadic Interdependence Organization Studies 11, 481-501en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, W.E. 1984 The Social Structure of a National Securities Market American Journal of Sociology 89, 775-811en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, W.E. & Faulkner, R.R. 1993 The Social Organization of Conspiracy Illegal Networks in the Heavy Electrical Equipment Industry American Sociological Review 58. 837-860en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes. J.A. 1954 Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish Human Relations 7 39-58en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBavelas, A. 1950 Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57. 271-282en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaysinger. B.D. Kosnik, R.D. & Turk. T.A. 1991 Ettects of Board and Ownership Strueture on Corporate R&D Strategy Academy of Management Journal 34, 205-214en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkowitz, S.D. 1982 An Introduction to Struetural Analysis Toronto Butterworthsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlau, P.M. 1982 Structural Sociology and Network Analysis An Overview In P Marsden & N Lin (eds). Social Structure and Network Analysis, pp 273-279 Beverly Hills CA Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoeker. W. & Goodstein, J. 1993 Performance and Successor Choice The Moderating Ettects of Governance and Ownership Academy of Management Journal 36, 172-186en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonacich, P. 1972 Techmque for Analyzing Overlapping Memberships In H Costner (ed), Sociological Methodology 1972. pp 176-185 San Francisco Jossey-Bassen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonacich, P. 1987 Power and Centrality A Family of Measures American Journal of Sociology 92, 1170-1182en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgatti. S.P. & Everett. M.G. 1992 the Notion of Position in Social Network Analysis In P V Marsden (ed). Sociological Methodology 1992, pp 1-35 Oxford Basil Blackwellen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBott. E. 1957 Family and Social Network Roles Norms, and External Relationslups in Ordinary Urban Families London Tavistock.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrass. D.J. & Burkhardt, M.E. 1992 Centrality and Power in Organizations In N Nohria & R G Eccles (eds), Networks and Organizations, pp 191-215 Boston Harvard Bust-ness School Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreiger, R.L., Boorman, S.A. & Aradie, P. 1975 An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data with Applications to Social Network Analysis and Comparison with Multidimensional Scaling Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12. 328-383en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrint, S. 1992. Hidden Meanings: Cultural Content and Context in Harrison White's Structural Sociology Sociological Theory 10. 194-208en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt, R.S. 1982. Toward A Structural Theory of Action Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action New York Academic Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt. R.S. 1983 Corporate Profits and Cooptation New York Academic Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt, R.S. 1987. Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalcnce. American Journal of Sociology 92, 1287-1335en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt. R.S. 1990 Detecting Role Equivalence Social Networks 12, 83-97en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurt. R.S. 1992 Structural Holes The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA Harvard University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClawson. D. & Neustadtl. A. 1989 Interlocks. PACs. and Corporate Conservatism American Journal of Sociology 94, 749-773en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran, P.L., Wood, R.A. & Jones, I.B. 1985 The Composition of Boards of Directors and Incidence of Golden Parachutes Academy of Management Journal 28, 664-671en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen. I.J. 1989 Structuration Theory London Macmillanen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman. J.S. 1990 Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge Harvard University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, K.S. 1982 Network Structures from an Exchange Perspective In P V Marsden & N Lin (eds). Social Structure and Network Analysis, pp 177-199 Beverly Hills. CA Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, K.S., Emerson, R.M.. Gillmore, M.R. & Yamagishi. T. 1983 The Distribution of Power in N-Person Exchange Networks Theory and Experimental Results American Journal of Sociology 89, 275-305en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook. K.S. & Whitmeyer, J.M. 1992 Two Approaches to Social Structure Exchange Theory and Network Analysis Annual Review of Sociology 18, 109-127en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, G.F. 1991 Agents Without Principles' The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 583-613en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDi Maggio, P.J. 1986 Structural Analysis of Organizational Fields A Blockmodel Approach. In B M Staw & L L Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, pp 335-370 Greenwich, CT JAI Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDi Maggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. 1983 The Iron Cage Revisited Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48, 147-160en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaucheux, C. & Mackenzie, K.D. 1966 Task Dependency of Organizational Centrality Its Behavioral Consequences Journal of Experimental Social Psvchology 2. 361-375en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFligstein, N. & Markowitz. L. 1993 Financial Reorganization of American Corporations in the 1980s In W J Wilson (ed). Sociology and the Public Agenda, pp 185-206 Newbury Park, CA Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman. L.C. 1979 Centrality in Social Networks I Conceptual Clarification Social Networks 1. 215-239en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedkin, N.E. 1984 Structural Cohesion and Equivalence Explanations of Social Homogeneity Sociological Methods and Research 12, 235-261en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedkin. N.E. 1991 Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures American Journal of Sociology 96. 1478-1504en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalaskiewiez. J. 1979 Exchange Networks and Community Politics Beverly Hills Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalaskiewicz, J. & Burt, R.S. 1941 Inter-organization Contagion and Corporate Philanthropy Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 88-105en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiddens, A. 1984 The Constitution of Society Outlines of a Theory of Structuration Cambridge, England Polity Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGould, R.V. & Fernandez, R.M. 1989 Structures of Mediation. A Formal Approach to Brokerage in I ransaction Networks In C C Clogg (ed). Sociological Methodology 1989. pp 89-126 Washington. DC American Sociological Associationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranovetter. M.S. 1985 Economic Action and Social Structure The Problem of Embeddedness American Journal of Sociology 91 481-510en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaines. V.A. 1988 Social Network Analysis. Structuration Theory, and the Holism-Individualism Debate Social Networks 10, 157-182en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarary, F.. Norman, R. & Cartwright. D. 1965 Structural Models An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs Nell York Wileyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaunschild, P.R. 1993 Interorganizational Imitation The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity Administrative Science Quarterly 38. 564-592en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHechter, M. 1987 Principles of Group Solidarity Berkeley University of California Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedstrom, P. 1993 Introduction to This Special Issue on Rational Choice Theory Acta Sociologica 36, 167en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins, T.K. 1964 The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups Totowa. N J Bedminsteren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson. J.C. 1986 Social Networks and Innovation Adoption A Look at Burt's Use of Structural Equivalence Social Networks 8, 343-364en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosnik, R.D. 1987. Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 163-185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrackhardt, D. 1992. The Strength of Strong Ties. The Importance of Philos in Organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations, pp. 216-239 Boston: Harvard Business School Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaumann. E.O. & Knoke, D. 1987. The Organizational State Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison. University of Wisconsin Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaumann, E.O. & Pappi, F.U. 1976. Networks of Collective Action. A Perspective on Community Influence Systems New York: Academic Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeavitt, H.J. 1951. Some Effects of Certain Communication Patterns on Group Performance Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 38-50en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeifer, E.M. & White, H.C. 1987 A Structural Approach to Markets In M S Mizruchi & M Schwartz (eds.), Intercorporate Relations, pp. 85-108. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevi-Strauss, C. 1969. Elementary Structures of Kinship Boston : Beaconen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, J.H. 1972. The Sphere of Influence. American Sociological Review 37, 14-27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorrain. F. & White, H.C. 1971 Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks Journal of Matlietnatical Sociology 1. 49-80en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMackenzie, K.D. 1976 A Theory of Group Structures New York : Gordon and Breachen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkovsky. B., Willer, D. & Patton, T. 1988 Power Relations in Exchange Networks American Sociological Review 53, 220-236en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsden, P.V. 1982 Brokerage Behavior in Restricted Exchange Networks In P V Marsden & N Lin (eds.), Social Strucntre and Network Analysts. pp 201-218 Beverly Hills, CA. Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsden, P.V. 1987. Elements of Interactor Dependence. In K S. Cook (ed), Social Exchange Theory, pp. 130-148. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, C.J. 1991. Shifting the Burden The Struggle Over Growth and Corporate Taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. 1977 Institutionalized Organizations Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMintz, B. & Schwartz. M. 1985 The Power Structure of American Business Chicago. University of Chicago Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, J.C. 1969. Social Networks in Urban Situations. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. 1982 The American Corporate Network 1904-1974. Beverly Hills, CA Sageen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. 1992. The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. 1993 Cohesion. Equivalence, and Similarity of Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment Social Networks 15. 275-307en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. 1994 What Do Interlocks Do' An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Los Angelesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S.. Allison, D.W. & Potts. B.B. 1994. Individual and Structural Interests in Political Decision Making: A Theoretical Discussion and Simulation Unpublished manuscript Department of Sociology. University of Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. & Galaskiewicz, J. 1993. Networks of Interorganizational Relations Sociological Methods and Research 22. 46-70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S., Mariolis, P.. Schwartz, M. & Mintz, B. 1986 Techniques for Disaggregating Centrality Scores in Social Networks In N B Tuma (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1986. pp 26-48 Washington : American Sociological Associationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizruchi, M.S. & Stearns, L.B. 1994 A Longitudinal Study of Borrowing by Large American Corporations Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 118-140en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore, G. 1979. The Structure of a National Elite Network American Sociological Review 44, 673-692en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoreno, J.L. 1934 Who Shall Survive? Washington, DC Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Companyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNieminen, U.J. 1974. On Centrality in a Graph Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 15, 322-336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, D., Barber, B.M., Zhou, X. & Soysal. Y. 1993 The Other Contested Terrain The Friendly and Predatory Acquisition of Large Corporations in the 1960s. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association Miami Beachen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, T. 1951. The Social System New York Free Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePettigrew, A.M. 1992. On Studying Managerial Elites. Strategic Management Journal 13, 163-182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfeffer, J. 1987. A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations In M S Mizruchi & M. Schwartz (eds.), lntercorporate Relations, pp 25-55. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell, W.W. & Di Maggio, P J (eds) 1991 The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago : University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRatcliff, R.E. 1980 Banks and Corporate Lending An Analysis of the Impact of the Internal Structure of the Capitalist Class on the Lending Behavior of Banks. American Sociological Review, 45, 553-570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSailer, L.D. 1978. Structural Equivalence: Meaning and Definition, Computation and Application. Social Networks 1, 73-90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSciulli, D. 1992 Theory of Societal Constitutionalism Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory. New York: Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott, 1991 Social Network Analysis: A Handbook Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmel, G. (1917) 1950. The Triad. In K. H Wolff (ed), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, pp 145-169 New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingh. H. & Hananto, F. 1989 Management-Board Relationships. Takeover Risk, and the Adoption of Golden Parachutes Academy of Management Journal 32, 7-24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStearns, L.B. & Mizruchi, M.S. 1993 Corporate Financing: Economic and Social Aspects In R Swedberg (ed), Explorations in Economic Sociology, pp 279-307. New York: Russell Sage Foundationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStephenson, K. & Zelen, M. 1989 Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Examples. Social Networks 11, 1-37en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStokman, F.N. & Van den Bos, J. M M 1992 A Two-Stage Model of Policymaking With an Empirical Test in the U S Energy-Policy Domain In G Moore & J A Whitt (eds), Research in Politics and Society, pp 219-253 Greenwich. CT JAI Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwidler, A. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies American Sociological Review 51. 273-286en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUzzi, B.D. 1993. The Dynamics of Organizational Networks: Structural Embeddedness and Economic Behavior Ph D dissertation, Department of Sociology. State University of New York at Stony Brooken_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWade, J., O'Reilly, C.A. III & Chandratat, I. 1990. Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 587-603.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeesie, J. & Flap, H. (eds.) 1990. Social Networks Through Time. Utrecht, Netherlands ISORen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWellman, B. 1988 Network Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. In B. Wellman & S. D Berkowitz (eds). Social Structures A Network Approach, pp 19-61. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, D.R. & Reitz, K.P. 1983. Graph and Semigroup Homomorphisms on Networks of Relations. Social Networks 5, 193-234en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, H.C. 1970. Chains of Opportunity Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, H.C. 1988 Varieties of Markets In B Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (eds.), Social Structures: A Network Approach, pp. 226-260 New York Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite. H.C. 1992a. Social Grammar for Culture Reply to Steven Brint. Sociological Theory 10, 209-213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, H.C. 1992b. Identity and Control A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite. H.C. 1993. Careers and Creativity Social Forces in the Arts Boulder, CO: Westviewen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, H.C., Boorman, S.A. & Breiger, R.L. 1976 Social Structure from Multiple Networks I - Blockmodels of Roles and Positions American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730-780en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies Analysis and Antitrust Implications New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 269-296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinship. C. [1973] 1988. Thoughts about Roles and Relations. An Old Document Revisited Social Networks 10, 209-231en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_000169939403700403.pdf
Size:
952.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.