Show simple item record

Accommodating Innovation In A Juvenile Court

dc.contributor.authorBarton, Williamen_US
dc.contributor.authorButts, Jeffreyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T20:03:59Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T20:03:59Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.citationBarton, William; Butts, Jeffrey (1990). "Accommodating Innovation In A Juvenile Court." Criminal Justice Policy Review 4(2): 144-158. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68050>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0887-4034en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68050
dc.description.abstractIn an attempt to reduce the number of adjudicated juveniles being committed to the state for placement, the juvenile court in Wayne CountyMichigan implemented three intensive supervision programs to serve as alternatives to commitment. A four-year, randomized evaluation of the programs found them to be cost-effective. An analysis of court processes, however, suggested that the programs gradually came to supplement rather than to displace commitments as intended. The results of this study illustrate how juvenile justice organizations adapt to the presence of alternative programs in ways that dilute their impact.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent820674 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleAccommodating Innovation In A Juvenile Courten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68050/2/10.1177_088740349000400204.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/088740349000400204en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCriminal Justice Policy Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldrich, H. 1979 Organizations And Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin, J., and B. Krisberg 1981 Wider, stronger, and different nets: The dialectics of criminal justice reform. Journal Of Research In Crime And Delinquency, 18: 165-196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton, W.H., and J.A. Butts 1990 Viable options: Intensive supervision programs for juvenile delinquents. Crime And Delinquency, 36: 238-256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBinder, A., and G. Geis 1984 Ad populum argumentation in criminology: Juvenile diversion as rhetoric. Crime And Delinquency, 30: 624-647.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlomberg, T.G. 1977 Diversion and accelerated social control. Journal Of Criminal Law And Criminology, 68: 274-282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChild, J. 1972 Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6: 1-22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClear, T.R., and P.L. Hardyman 1990 The new intensive supervision movement. Crime And Delinquency, 36: 42-60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, S. 1985 Visions Of Social Control: Crime, Punishment And Classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCullen, F.T., J.B. Cullen, and J.F. Wozniak 1988 Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public. Journal Of Criminal Justice, 16: 303-317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecker, S.A. 1985 A systemic analysis of diversion: Net widening and beyond. Journal Of Criminal Justice, 13: 207-216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmery, F.E., and E.L. Trist 1965 The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18: 21-31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEzell, M. 1989 Juvenile arbitration: Net widening and other unintended consequences. Journal Of Research In Crime And Delinquency, 26: 358-377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalvin, J., and K. Polk 1983 Juvenile justice: Time for new direction? Crime And Delinquency, 29: 325-332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGouldner, A. 1954 Patterns Of Industrial Bureaucracy. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, P.R. 1990 Community corrections in Kansas: Extending community-based corrections or widening the net? Journal Of Research In Crime And Delinquency, 27: 79-101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlein, M.W. 1979 Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: A litany of impediments. In N. Morris & M. Tonry Eds., Crime And Justice: An Annual Review Of Research. vol. 1. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence, P.R., and J.W. Lorsch 1967 Organization And Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessinger, S.L. 1955 Organizational transformation: A case study of declining social movement. American Sociological Review, 20: 3-10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetersilia, J. 1990 Conditions that permit intensive supervision programs to survive. Crime And Delinquency, 36: 126-145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfeffer, J., and G. Salancik 1978 The External Control Of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolk, K. 1987 When less means more: An analysis of destructuring in criminal justice. Crime And Delinquency, 33: 358-378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelznick, P. 1949 TVA And The Grass Roots. Berkeley : University Of California Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinhart, D. 1988 California opinion poll: Public attitudes on youth crime. NCCD Focus. San Francisco: National Council On Crime And Delinquency.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomson, D.R. 1990 How plea bargaining shapes intensive probation supervision policy goals. Crime And Delinquency, 36: 146-161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonry, M. 1990 Stated and latent functions of ISP. Crime And Delinquency, 36: 174-191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYuchtman, E., and S.E. Seashore 1967 A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32: 891-903.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZald, M.N., and P. Denton 1963 From evangelism to general service: The transformation of the YMCA. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8: 214-234.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.