View Item 

Show simple item record

Child Labor Laws
dc.contributor.authorSarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorieen_US
dc.contributor.authorZald, Mayer N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T20:04:24Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T20:04:24Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationSarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie; Zald, Mayer (1995). "Child Labor Laws." Administration & Society 27(1): 25-53. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68057>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-3997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68057
dc.description.abstractModels of public policy implementation proliferated during the 1970s and 1980s. We argue that these models should be robust across different time periods and should accurately postdict and explain the outcomes known to have occurred. This article looks at two models of policy implementation, one developed by Mazmanian and Sabatier and another developed by Nakwnura and Smallwood. Robustness and explanatory ability of these models are assessed using a historical case study of the first national child labor law. This demonstrates the advantages of a historical perspective on policy implementation. Looking at policy across time raises questions about current models of implementation.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2665717 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleChild Labor Lawsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWayne State Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68057/2/10.1177_009539979502700102.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/009539979502700102en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAdministration & Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbbott, G. (Ed.). (1938). The child and the state (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1832)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison, G. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review, 63, 689-718.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey v. Drexel Furniture. 259 U.S. 20; 66 L.Ed. 187; 42 S. Ct. 449 (1922).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeveridge, A. J. (1938). Senator Beveridge declares regulation of child labor a national problem. In G. Abbott (Ed.), The child and the state (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1832)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBullock, C. S. III, & Lamb, C. M. (1984). Implementation of civil rights policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as a paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539-553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChute, C. L. (1912). Enforcement of child labor laws. The Child Labor Bulletin, 1(2), 108-113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleland, H. G. (1981). Child labor. The encyclopedia Americana (Vol. 6). Danbury, CN: Grolier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 211-217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFair Labor Standards Act of 1938, June 25, 1938, ch. 676,52 Stat. 1060 (29 U.S.C.§§201 to 219).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg, G. D., Miller, J. A., Mohr, L. B., & Vladeck, B. C. (1977). Developing public policy theory: Perspectives from empirical research. American Political Science Review, 71, 1532-1543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberger, M., Crenson, M. A., & Crissey, B. C. (1976). Models in the policy process: Public decision making in the computer era. New York: Russell Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton, A. (1938). Alexander Hamilton on the employment of children. In G. Abbott (Ed.), The child and the state (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1832)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammer v. Dagenhart. 247 U.S. 251; 62L.Ed. 1101; 38 S. Ct. 529 (1918).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, C. O. (1984). An introduction to the study of public policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeating-Owen Act, Sept. 1, 1916, c. 432, 39 Stat. 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirst, M., & Jung, R. (1980). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen-year view of Title I, ESEA. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2, 17-34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis, E. (1977). American politics in a bureaucratic age: Citizens, constituents, clients, and victims. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovejoy, O. R. (1912). Seventh annual report of the General Secretary of the National Child Labor Committee. Child Labor Bulletin, 1(1), 187-223.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovejoy, O. R. (1916). Twelfth annual report of the General Secretary of the National Child Labor Committee. Child Labor Bulletin, 5, 141-153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLowi, T. (1967). The public philosophy: Interest group liberalism. American Political Science Review, 61, 5-24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLumpkin, K. D., & Douglas, D. W. (1937). Child workers in America. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazmanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (1989). Implementation and public policy: With a new postscript. Lanham, NY: University Press of America.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Kelway, A. J. (1912). Child labor and democracy. Child Labor Bulletin, 1(1), 121-127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Kelway, A. J. (1916). Passing the federal child labor law. Child Labor Bulletin, 5, 91-93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamnura, R., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeustadt, R. E., & May, E. R. (1986). Thinking in time. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgburn, W. F. (1912). Progress and uniformity in child-labor legislation. New York: AMS Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, A. J. (1912). A federal children's bureau. Child Labor Bulletin, 1(1), 85-105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRevenue Act, Feb. 4, 1919, ch. 18, 40 Stat. 1057 (2 U.S.C.§§271, 27, 273 to 277; 19§460; see 31 §9303).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1988). Policy change and policy-oriented learning: Exploring an advocacy coalition framework [Special issue]. Policy Sciences, 21, 129-168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabatier, P. A., & Pelkey, N. (1987). Incorporating multiple actors and guidance instruments into models of regulatory policymaking: An advocacy coalition framework. Administration & Society, 19, 236-263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalamon, L. M. (1976). Follow-ups, let-downs, and sleepers: The time dimension in policy evaluation. In C. O. Jones & R. Thomas (Eds.), Public policy-making in a federal system. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider. A. L. (1982). Studying policy implementation. Evaluation Review, 6, 715-730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart, R. (1975). Reformation of administrative law. Harvard Law Review, 88, 1669-1813.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStockburger, C. (1976). Child labor. Dictionary of American history (Vol. 2). New York: Scribner.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, F. I. (1916). Enforcement of child labor laws. Child Labor Bulletin, 5, 161-167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrattner, W. I. (1970). Crusade for the children: A history of the National Child Labor Committee and child labor reform in America. Chicago: Quadrangle.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1917). Fifth annual report of the chief, children's bureau, to the secretary of labor. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1921). Administration of the first federal child-labor law (Children's Bureau Publication No. 78). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1922). Tenth annual report of the chief children's bureau, to the secretary of labor. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1923). Standards and problems connected with the issuance of employment certificates (Children's Bureau Publication No. 116). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1924). Twelfth annual report of the chief, children's bureau, to the secretary of labor. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1926). Child labor in the United States: Ten questions answered (Children's Bureau Publication No. 114). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Department of Labor. (1930). Child labor facts and figures (Children's Bureau Publication No. 197). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework Administration & Society, 6, 445-488.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWanat, J. (1974). Bases of budgetary incrementalism. American Political Science Review, 68, 1221-1228.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_009539979502700102.pdf
Size:
2.542MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.