Show simple item record

Adolescents' Communication Styles for Learning About Birth Control from Mass Media

dc.contributor.authorDe Pietro, Roccoen_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Noreen M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T20:13:12Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T20:13:12Z
dc.date.issued1983en_US
dc.identifier.citationDe Pietro, Rocco; Clark, Noreen (1983). "Adolescents' Communication Styles for Learning About Birth Control from Mass Media." Health Education & Behavior 10(2): 106-119. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68207>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68207
dc.description.abstractThis article is an exploratory study to identify discrete factors which predict the way in which adolescents are likely to communicate about birth control after receiving information from a mass medium is described. First, we discuss styles of interacting with others regarding information from mass media which have been described in previous research. Five styles are identified: media-oriented, peer-oriented, home-oriented, professionally-oriented, and multi-source oriented. Next, we discuss categories of factors which theoretically should distinguish among the five communication styles. These factors are drawn from theories and previous research in communication and social learning. Using data collected from a random sample of 100 adolescents, we then test the predictive ability of categories of factors. Discriminant analysis is used to determine which factors within categories are most predictive of style and which best discriminate between styles. Eight factors are identified which predict 75% of all communication styles. The factors are sex, race, giving advice about sex, seeking information about birth control, dating rules regarding where one can go, dating rules regarding behavior on dates, feelings of pride, and feelings of popularity. Finally, we discuss the significance for practitioners of study findings and of predicting adolescents' communication styles.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent687974 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleAdolescents' Communication Styles for Learning About Birth Control from Mass Mediaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68207/2/10.1177_109019818301000203.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/109019818301000203en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Education & Behavioren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Pietro RA Allen Rl Communication styles and learning about birth control Adolescence (in press)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorder-Bolz CR Mediation the role of signify ant others Journal of Communication 30(3):106-118, 1980en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobertson TS Parental mediation of television effects Journal of Communication 29(1):12-25, 1979en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaloman G. Interaction of Media, Cognition and Learning San Francisco Jossey-Bass, 1979.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke P., De Pietro RA Delivering information on human sexuality and birth control to teenagers. the test of a social comparison approach A report to the C S. Mott Foundation, Department of Communication. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1980en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg BS, Ericson PM, Vlahos M. Children's television behaviors as perceived by mother and child. Michigan State University, 1971 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 058 750)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross L., Morgan M. Television and enculturation In J Dominick and JK Fletcher (Eds), Broadcasting Research Methods. A Reader. Boston Allyn and Bacon, In pressen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandura A.: Social Learning Theory. Morristown, NJ. General Learning Press, 1971en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreeno JG: Language understanding and learning A paper presented at the Symposium on Individual Differences, Cognition, and Learning American Association tor the Advancement of Science, Denver, Colorado, 1977en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke P., Kline FG Media effects reconsidered. Communication Research 1 224-240, 1974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarace RV, Monge PR, Russell HM: Communicating and Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirande M.: Reference group theory and adolescent sexual behavior Journal of Marriage and the Family 30:572-577, 1968en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz B., Bohrnstedt GW, Borgatta EF, Evans RR Explaining permarital sexual intercourse among college students: a causal model Social Forces 56 148-165, 1977en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChilman: CS: Adolescent Sexuality in a Changing American Society. DHFW Publication, No (NIH) 79-1226en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg M.: Conceiving the Self. New York Basic Books, Inc 1979en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouvan E., Adelson J. The Adolescent Experience. New York Wiley, 1966en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNye I., Berardo FM: The Family Its Structure and Interaction. New York Macmillan Publishing Co., 1973en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAronson E.: The Social Animal. San Francisco WH Freeman and Co, 1972en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlecka R.: Discriminant Analysis Beverley Hills Sage Publications, 1980en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePedhazur EJ Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.