Show simple item record

Hierarchical Concurrent Engineering in a Multiagent Framework

dc.contributor.authorD'Ambrosio, Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorDarr, Timothy P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBirmingham, Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T20:16:11Z
dc.date.available2010-04-13T20:16:11Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationD'Ambrosio, Joseph; Darr, Timothy; Birmingham, William (1996). "Hierarchical Concurrent Engineering in a Multiagent Framework." Concurrent Engineering 4(1): 47-57. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68258>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1063-293Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68258
dc.description.abstractOur experience indicates coordination in concurrent engineering (CE) requires support for two types of relationships among decision makers supervisor/subordinate and peer-to-peer Supervisor/subordinate relationships are created by the standard hierarchical decomposition process that is required to solve any large design problem Peer-to-peer relationships arise when teams of decision makers must interact, without direct guidance, to achieve individual and common goals In this paper, we describe a general decision-making methodology, which we call hierarchical CE The emphasis of hierarchical CE is to provide support for both supervisor/subordinate and peer-to-peer relationships In addition to the concept of hierarchical CE, we present a supporting agent-based framework in which the preferences and constraints of a design supervi sor are distributed to design subordinates, who are expected to exploit their local expertise within the context provided by this global information A distinct separation between feasibility and value facilitates optimal decision-making by design agents, since the bounds on feasibility do not include arbitrary statements about value This distinction may prove useful for other problem domains as wellen_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1087710 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherConcurrent Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.otherValue Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherDistributed Constrant Satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.otherMultilevel Optimizationen_US
dc.subject.otherAgentsen_US
dc.subject.otherHierarchical Decompositionen_US
dc.titleHierarchical Concurrent Engineering in a Multiagent Frameworken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEngineering (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumArtificial Intelligence Lab, EECS Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumArtificial Intelligence Lab, EECS Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumArtificial Intelligence Lab, EECS Department, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68258/2/10.1177_1063293X9600400105.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1063293X9600400105en_US
dc.identifier.sourceConcurrent Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutkosky, M.R., et al. 1993. "PACT: an Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems," IEEE Computer, pp. 28-37, January.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarr, T.P. and W.P. Birmingham. 1995. "A Case Study in Design Service Integration," in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CE95, pp. 409-415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, D. and R.G. Smith. 1983. "Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving," Artificial Intelligence, 20:63-109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDantzig, G.B. and P. Wolfe. 1961. "The Decomposition Algorithm for Linear Programming," Econometrica, 9(4).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacko, D. and Y.Y. Haimes. 1978. "Overlapping Coordination of Hierarchical Structures," IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-8(10):745-751.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaimes, Y.Y. 1981. "Hierarchical Holographic Modeling," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11(9):606-617.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzarm, S. and W.-C. Li. 1988. "A Two-Level Decomposition Method for Design Optimization," Engineering Optimization, 13:211-224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1990. "Sensitivity of Complex, Internally Coupled Systems;' AIAA Journal, 28(1):153-160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuokka, D.R. and L.T. Harada. 1995. "Communication Infrastructure for Concurrent Engineering," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 9(4):283-297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark, H. et al. 1994. "An Agent-Based Approach to Concurrent Cable Harness Design," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 8:45-61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuyn, P.N., M.R. Genesereth and R. Letsinger. 1993. "Automated Concurrent Engineering in Design World," IEEE Computer, pp. 74-76, January.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerkman, K.J. 1992. "Multiple Agent Cooperative Design Evaluation Using Negotiation," Artificial Intelligence in Design '92, Kluwer Academic Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarr, T.P. and W.P. Birmingham. 1994. "Automated Design for Concurrent Engineering," IEEE Expert, 9(5):35-42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarr, T.P. and W.P. Birmingham. 1996. "An Attribute-Space Representation and Algorithm for Concurrent Engineering," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, G.Q. and J.A. Brandon. 1993. "Agents for Cooperating Expert Systems in Concurrent Engineering Design," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, 7(3):145-158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeeney, R.L. and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York: Wiley and Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThurston, D.L. 1991. "A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes;' Research in Engineering Design, 3:105-122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDAmbrosio, J.D. and W.P. Birmingham. 1995. "Preference-Directed Design," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing (AI EDAM), 9:219-230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, C.C. et al. 1984. "A Model of Multi-Attribute Decision Making and Trade-Off Weight Determination Under Uncertainty;' IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-14(2):223-229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu, X., J.G. DAmbrosio, B.T. Murray and D. Tang. 1994. "Codesign of Architectures for Automotive Powertrain Modules," IEEE Micro, 14(4):17-25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD'Ambrosio, J.G. and X. Hu. 1994. "Configuration-Level Hardware/Software Partitioning for Real-Time Embedded Systems," presented at The Third International Workshop on Hardware-Software Codesign, September.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDAmbrosio, J.G. and W.P. Birmingham. 1995. "Hierarchical Concurrent Engineering: Supporting Hierarchical Decomposition and Peer-to-Peer Problem Solving," University of Michigan Technical Report CSE-TR-259-95, September.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaltings, B. 1994. "Arc-Consistency for Continuous Variables," Artificial Intelligence, 65(2):363-379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyvönen, E. 1992.%"Constraint Reasoning Based on Interval Arithmetic: The Tolerance Propagation Approach," Artificial Intelligence, 58:71-112.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.