Toward a Theory of Innovation
dc.contributor.author | Downs, George | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mohr, Lawrence | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-13T20:17:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-13T20:17:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1979 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Downs, George; Mohr, Lawrence (1979). "Toward a Theory of Innovation." Administration & Society 10(4): 379-408. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68286> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0095-3997 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68286 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this article is to eliminate further conceptual obstacles to the develop ment of a workable theory of innovation and to move toward a better theoretic statement. The approach to overcoming the conceptual problems centers primarily around four ideas: (1) building a theory around the "innovation decision" as the unit of analysis, rather than either innovations or adopters: (2) lifting the level of general ity of independent variables so that a great deal of statistical interaction is avoided; (3) splitting the act of innovation into two stages, diffusion and adoption, to eliminate the confounding effects of time of awareness in studies of innovation; (4) introducing the idea of a "fair-trial point" into the conceptualization of innovation, solving sev eral additional problems at once. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1291925 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Toward a Theory of Innovation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Political Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of California, Davis | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68286/2/10.1177_009539977901000401.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/009539977901000401 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Administration & Society | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Campbell, D. (1973) "The social scientist as methodological servant of the experimenting society." Policy Studies J. 2: 72-75. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cohen, M. and J. March (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity. New York: Mc Graw-Hill. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cronbach, L. (1975) "Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology." Amer. Psychologist 30 (February): 116-127. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cyert, R. and J. March (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston : Little, Brown. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Downs, G. (1976) Bureaucracy, Innovation, and Public Policy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | ——— and L. Mohr (1976) "Conceptual issues in the study of innovation." Admin. Sci. Q. 21: 700-714. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaufman, H. (1960) The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Knight, K. (1967) "A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process." J. of Business 40: 478-496. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mac Crimmon, K. and R. Taylor (1976) "Decision making and problem solving," in M. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: Rand Mc Nally. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | March, J. and H. Simon (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Medawar, P. (1977) "Unnatural science." New York Review of Books (February 3): 13ff. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mohr, L. (1969) "Determinants of Innovations in Organizations." Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 63: 111-126. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Niskanen, W.A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Normann, R. (1971) "Organizational innovativeness: product variation and reorientation." Admin. Sci. Q. 16: 203-215. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rabkin, J. and E. Struening (1976) "Life events, stress, and illness." Sci. 198: 1013-1020. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rogers, E. and F. Shoemaker (1971) Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simon, H. (1959) "Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science." Amer. Economic Rev. 49: 253-283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1968) "The relative importance of probabilities and pay offs in risk taking." J. of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 78, 3: part 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilson, J. (1966) "Innovation in organizations: notes toward a theory," in J. Thompson (ed.) Approaches to Organizational Design. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Winter, S., Jr. (1968) Toward a Neo-Schumpeterian Theory of the Firm. Publication No. P-3802. Santa Monica : Rand Corporation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zaltman, G., R. Duncan, and J. Holbek (1973) Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.