Show simple item record

Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups

dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Poppy L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLobel, Sharonen_US
dc.contributor.authorCox, Taylor H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:43:29Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:43:29Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcLeod, Poppy; Lobel, Sharon; Cox, Taylor (1996). "Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups." Small Group Research 2(27): 248-264. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68515>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-4964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68515
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing belief among managers that ethnic diversity, when well managed, can provide organizations with certain competitive advantages. But the belief in this value-inl diversity hypothesis rests largely on anecdotal rather than empirical evidence. Results are reported ofa controlled experimental study that compares the performance on a brainstorm ing task between groups composed of all Anglo-Americans with groups composed ofAnglo-, Asian, African, and Hispanic Americans. The particular brainstorming task used-The Tourist Problem-was chosenfor its relevancefordiversity along the dimension of ethnicity. The ideas produced by the ethnically diverse groups were judged to be of higher quality-more effective andfeasible-than the ideas produced by the homogeneous groups. Members of homogeneous groups reported marginally more attraction to their groups than did members of diverse oroups. Directions for future research with respect to the degree of diversity, the nature of the task, and group process are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1536296 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.en_US
dc.titleEthnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Iowaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSeattle Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68515/2/10.1177_1046496496272003.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1046496496272003en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, N. J. (1986). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston: PWS-Kent.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 459-477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBond, M. H., & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 169-185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBontempo, R., Lobel, S. A., & Triandis, H. C. (1990). Compliance and value internalization in Brazil and the U.S.: Effects of allocentrism and anonymity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 200-213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouchard, T. J., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 51-55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCopeland, L. (1988). Valuing diversity: Making the most of cultural differences in the workplace. Personnel, 65, 52-60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, T., Jr. (1991). The multicultural organization. The Academy of Management Executive, 5, 43-47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, T., Jr. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research & practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, T., Jr., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 45-56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, T., Jr., Lobel, S. A., & Mc Leod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic groups' cultural dif ferences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827-847.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, M., &Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGAilupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronicbrainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarza, R. T., Romero, L. G., Cox, B., & Ramirez, M. (1982). Biculturalism, locus of control and leader behavior in ethnically mixed small groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 237-253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, W. K., & Dillon, P. C. (1974). Creative supergroups: Group performance as a function of individual performance on brainstorming tasks. The Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 101-105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman, L. R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401-407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJablin, F. M. (1981). Cultivating imagination: Factors that enhance and inhibit creativity in brainstorming groups. Human Communication Research, 7, 245-258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa V. I., & Cooper, D. M. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Interpersonal dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotion and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-679.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston, W. B. (1991). Global workforce 2000: The new world labor market. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 115-127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston, W. B., & Packer, A. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the 21st century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanter, R. (1968, February). Creating the creative environment. Management Review, 11-12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerwin, R. (1983). Brainstorming as a flexible management tool. Personnel Journal, 62, 414-414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing, N., & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups. In M. A. West & J. F Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKovach, C. (1976). Some notes for observing group process in small task-oriented groups. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles, Graduate School of Management.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambert, W. (1977). The effects of bilingualism on the individual: Cognitive and sociocultural consequences. In P. A. Hurnbey (Ed.), Bilingualism: Psychological, social and educational implications (pp. 15-27). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLamm, H., & Tronumsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): Areview. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Grath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction andperformance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Leod, P. L., Liker, J. K., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). Process feedback in task groups: An application of goal setting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 15-41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 19-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firmperformance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125-141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemeth, C. J. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, &J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process andproductivity (pp. 95-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNystrom, H. (1979). Creativity and innovation. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Guinn, T. C., Faber, R. J., Curias, N.J.J., &Schmitt, K. (1989). The cultivationof consumer norms. Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 779-785.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelz, D., & Andrews, F. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz, A. E. (1991). Using brainstorming to identify creative solutions. Supervisory Management, 36, 4-4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, R. R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 107-117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriandis, H. C., Hall, E. R., & Ewan, R. B. (1965). Member homogeneity and dyadic creativity. Human Relations, 18, 33-54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTse, D. K., Lee, K. H., Vertinsky, I., & Wehrung, D. A. (1988). Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing, 5, 81-95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, B. A., & Hanson, W. C. (1992). Valuing differences at Digital Equipment Corporation. In S. E. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives (pp. 119-137). New York: Guilford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiller, R. C., Behringer, R. D., & Goodchilds, J. E. (1962). Group creativity under conditions of success or failure and variations in groups' stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 43-49.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.