Show simple item record

Cultural Preference and the Expository Writing of African-American Adolescents

dc.contributor.authorBall, Arnethaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:51:22Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:51:22Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationBALL, ARNETHA (1992). "Cultural Preference and the Expository Writing of African-American Adolescents." Written Communication 4(9): 501-532. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68647>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0741-0883en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68647
dc.description.abstractResearch by linguists and educators confirms the observation that aspects of the African-American experience are reflected in the grammatical, phonological, lexical, and stylistic features of African-American English and in the patterns of language use, including narrative, found in African-American speech communities. This study goes beyond prior research to investigate and characterize what Hymes refers to as the preferred patterns for the “organization of experience” among African-American adolescents. The results of the study revealed that, although subjects from several ethnic backgrounds stated a preference for using vernacular-based organizational patterns in informal oral exposition, African-American adolescents, in contrast to a group of Hispanic-American, Asian-American, and European-American adolescents, reported a strong preference for using vernacular-based patterns in academic writing tasks as they got older. These findings suggest that the organization of expository discourse is affected by cultural preference and years of schooling and that preference for organizational patterns can be viewed as an obstacle to or as a resource in successful literacy-related experiences.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2880337 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONSen_US
dc.titleCultural Preference and the Expository Writing of African-American Adolescentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68647/2/10.1177_0741088392009004003.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0741088392009004003en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahams, R. (1970). Deep down in the jungle; Negro narrative folklore from the streets of Philadelphia. Hatboro, PA: Folklore Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahams, R. (1976). Talking Black. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApplebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school (Research Monograph No. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, A. F. (1990, April). A study of the oral and written descriptive patterns of Black adolescents in vernacular and academic discourse settings. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Convention.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, A. F. (1991). Organizational patterns in the oral and written expository language of African-American adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaugh, J. (1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaugh, J. (1989). New and prevailing misconceptions of African-American English for logic and mathematics. Paper presented at Stanford University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBritton J. (1975). The development of writing abilities. London: Macmillan Education.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalfee, R. C., & Chambliss, M. J. (1987a). The structural design features of large texts. Educational Psychologist, 22, 357-378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalfee, R. C., & Chambliss, M. J. (1987b). Text analysis project reference manual. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalfee, R. C., & Chambliss, M. J. (1988). Text analysis project overhead binder. Unpublished diagram, Stanford University, Text Analysis Project, Stanford, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, W. H. (1985). The Afro-American griot. In C. C. Brooks (Ed.), Tapping potential: English and language arts for the Black learner (pp. 260-271). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, G. C. (1980a, April). Everyone does not think alike. English Journal, pp. 45-50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, G. C. (1980b, July). A look at our language. New Directions, pp. 14-17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrystal, D. (1990). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCsikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErickson, F. (1984). Rhetoric, anecdote, and rhapsody: Coherence strategies in a conversation among Black American adolescents. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 81-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFasold, R. W. (1978). Tense markings in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibbs, J. T. (1988). Young, Black, and male in America: An endangered species. Dover, MA: Auburn House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolden, J. L., & Rieke, R. D. (1971). The rhetoric of Black Americans. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGumperz, J. J., Kaltman, H., & O'Connor, M. C. (1984). Cohesion in spoken and written discourse: Ethnic style and the transition to literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 3-19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. In Language in urban society. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English (English Language Series No. 9). New York: Longman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3(2), 183-195.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHymes, D. (1981). “In vain I tried to tell you”; Studies in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHymes, D. (1982). Narrative form as a “grammar” of experience: Native Americans and a glimpse of English. Journal of Education, 164, 121-142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKochman, T. (1981). Black and White styles in conflict. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLabov, W. (1972). The logic of non-standard English. In W. Labov, Language in the inner-city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 201-240). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published in 1969 in J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Report of the 21st Annual Round Table on Linguistics and Language Studies, Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, 23. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLabov, W. (1972). Language in the inter-city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger, J. A. (1987). A sociocognitive perspective on literacy. In J. A. Langer (Ed.), Language, literacy, and culture: Issues of society and schooling (pp. 1-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, B.J.F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purpose, procedures, and problems, Parts 1 and 2. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichaels, S. (1981). “Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10(1), 423-442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichaels, S., & Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 219-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Assessment of Educational Progress. (1990). America's challenge: Accelerating academic achievement, a summary of findings from 20 years of NAEP. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents: The acquisition of communicative competence (chap. 6). New York: Basil Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRose, M. (1990). Lives on the boundary. New York: Penguin Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, B. A. (1988). Can these dry bones live? The art of the American folk preacher. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmitherman, G. (1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTannen, D. (Ed.). (1982). Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTannen, D. (1984). Coherence in spoken and written discourse (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.