View Item 

Show simple item record

Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction
dc.contributor.authorLandman, Janeten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:55:45Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:55:45Z
dc.date.issued1987en_US
dc.identifier.citationLandman, Janet (1987). "Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13(4): 524-536. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68720>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68720
dc.description.abstractIn their research on decision under uncertainty, Kahneman and Tversky (1982a) examined whether, given the same negative outcome, there is any difference in the experience of regret, depending on whether the outcome follows action or inaction. This study attempted to replicate Kahneman and Tversky's (1982a) finding of greater regret for action than inaction and to determine whether this pattern extends to the parallel case of joy over happy outcomes, to different life domains, and to both genders. Through a vignette experiment, the previousfinding of a strong tendency to imagine greater regret following action than inaction was replicated. The same pattern was observed in the case of joy over positive outcomes. In two of the three vignettes presented, this "actor effect "was stronger for negative than for positive outcomes. In a third vignette, explicit knowledge of a missed negative outcome seems to have magnified the usual joy over having made a good decision, causing the expected joy over acting and succeeding to rise to the typically high level of regret over acting and failing. Suggestions regarding the future study of these issues are offered.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1275072 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleRegret and Elation Following Action and Inactionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68720/2/10.1177_0146167287134009.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146167287134009en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbelson, R. P., & Kanouse, D. E. (1966). Subjective acceptance of verbal generalizations. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtthowe, J. M. (1960). Types of conflict and their resolution: A reinterpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBell, D. E. (1981). Explaining utility theory paradoxes by decision regret. In J. Morse (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (pp. 28-39). New York: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirnbaum, M. (1972). Morality judgments: Test of an averaging model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 35-42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrehm, J. W., & Wicklund, R. A. (1970). Regret and dissonance reduction as a function of postdecision salience of dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 1-7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R., Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman, S. (1966). Motivational aspects of attitudinal elements and their place in cognitive interaction. In S. Feldman (Ed.), Cognitive consistency. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFestinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFestinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFestinger, L., & Walster, E. (1964). Post-decision regret and decision reversal. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHearst, E. (1984a). Absence as information: Some implications for learning, performance, and representational processes. In H. L. Roitblat, T. B. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHearst, E. (1984b, April 4). Empty intervals and absent events: Something about nothing in the psychology of animals and people. Distinguished faculty research lecture, Indiana University, Bloomington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenkins, H. M., & Sainsbury, R. S. (1970). Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive or negative trials. In D. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, J. T. (1986). The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 51-62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982a). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160-173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982b). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. (1971). Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person, and the group. In New directions in psychology III. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805-824.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Clelland, D. C., Davis, W. N., Kalin, R., & Wanner, E. (1972). The drinking man. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, J., Wolff, W. T., & Hearst, E. (1980). The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 630-650.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379-389.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.) (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRettig, S., & Rawson, H. E. (1963). The risk hypothesis in predictive judgments of unethical behavior. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 66, 243-248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSage, A. P., & White, E. B. (1983). Decision and information structures in regret: Models of judgment and choice. 1EEE: Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 136-143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSainsbury, R. S. (1973). Discrimination learning using positive or negative cues. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 46-57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78 (Pt. 2).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWason, P. D., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1965). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186-200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0146167287134009.pdf
Size:
1.216MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.