Business Writing in History: What Caused the Dictamen's Demise?
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Jane | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-14T13:57:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-14T13:57:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Thomas, Jane (1999). "Business Writing in History: What Caused the Dictamen's Demise?." Journal of Business Communication 36(1): 40-54. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68754> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9436 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68754 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many of the earliest business and administrative letters written in English fol lowed a set of rules called the ars dictaminis, a formal and complex model that prescribed a certain writing style and organization. The necessary pattern of organization was the following: address, salutation, notification, exposition, dispo sition, valediction, and attestation and date. The dictamen almost completely dis appears in the sixteenth century. Did the dictamen disappear suddenly? If so, why? In this paper, I argue that the dictamen disappeared slowly by attrition over the hundred years previous, and further, that it was never universal, as previous scholars have argued. The evidence for the claim that the dictamen was widely used and suddenly disappeared consists mostly of Chancery and government docu ments. When we take into account the mass of business documents involving ordi nary business people, including the largest surviving collection of business docu ments in English before 1500, the Cely papers, we see that by the late fifteenth century, ordinary business people were not following the dictamen's conventions. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 3108 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 855622 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Business Writing in History: What Caused the Dictamen's Demise? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Communications | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68754/2/10.1177_002194369903600102.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/002194369903600102 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Business Communication | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bolton, J.L. (1980). The medieval English economy 1150-1500. London: Clarendon Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Burchfield, R. (1985). From William Caxton to George Washington: 1476-1776. In R. Burchfield (Ed.), The English language (pp. 20-33). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cely Papers. (1472-1485). S.C.I. Vols 53, 59, 60, 63. Ancient correspondence. Public Record Office, London. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cely Papers. (1472-1485). Chancery miscellanea, [C. 47] Bundle 37. Files 10-16, 20, 21. Public Record Office, London. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chambers, R. W., & Daunt, M. (Eds.). (1967). A book of London English: 1384-1425. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chrimes, S.B. (1959). An introduction to the administrative history of medieval England. (2nd ed.). London: Longman. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Clanchy, M.T. (1979). From memory to written record: England, 1066-1307. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cressy, D. (1975). Education in Tudor England. New York: St. Martin's. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cressy, D. (1980). Literacy and the social order: Reading and writing in Tudor and Stuart England. New York: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davis, N. (1971). Paston letters and papers of the 15th century. Oxford: Clarendon. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dyer, C. (1989). Standards of living in the later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fisher, J., Richardson, M., & Fisher, J. (1984). An anthology of Chancery English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fisher, J. (1977, October). Chancery and the emergence of standard written English in the fifteenth century. Speculum, 52(4), 870-899. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Görlach, M. (1991). Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hanham, A. (1975). The Cely letters, 1472-1488. London: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hanham, A. (1985). The Celys and their world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hildebrandt, H.W. (1985). A 16th-century work on communication: precursor of modern business communication. In G. Douglas & H. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Studies in the history of business writing (pp. 53-67). Urbana, IL: Association for Business Communication. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kingsford, C.L. (1919). Stonor letters and papers. Royal Historical Society, Camden 3rd Series. 2 Vols. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Locker, K.O., Miller, S.L., Richardson, M., Tebeaux, E., & Yates, J. (1996, June). Studying the history of business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 109-127. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mc Intosh, A., Samuels, M.L., & Benskin, M. (1986). A linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Myers, A.R. (1985). Crown, household, and parliament in fifteenth-century England. London: Hambledon Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Orme, N. (1973). English schools in the Middle Ages. London: Methuen. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richardson, M. (1980, Spring). The earliest business letters in English: an overview. The Journal of Business Communication 17(3), 19-31. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richardson, M. (1984, Autumn). The dictamen and its influence on fifteenth-century Eng lish prose. Rhetorica: A journal of the history of rhetoric, 2(3), 207-226. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richardson, M. (1985). Business writing and the spread of literacy in late medieval England. In G. Douglas & H. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Studies in the history of business writing (pp. 1-9). Urbana, IL: Association for Business Communication. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richardson, M. (1997). Women, commerce, and rhetoric in medieval England. In M. M. Wertheimer (Ed.), The rhetorical activities of historical women (pp. 133-149). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rogers, P. (1989, Summer). Choice-based writing in managerial contexts: The case of the dealer contact report. The Journal of Business Communication 26(3), 197-216. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stapleton, T. (1839). Plumpton correspondence. London : Camden Society. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thomson, G.S. (1958). Wool merchants of the 15th century. London: Longman. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thomas, J. (1994). The language of the Celys. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1994). University Microfilms International, 9423332. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thrupp, S.L. (1992). The merchant class of medieval London. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1995). Explicit and implicit structuring of genres: Electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Working paper Alfred P. Sloan School of Management WP #3809-95. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.