View Item 

Show simple item record

Critical Theory in the Management Classroom: Engaging Power, Ideology, and Praxis

dc.contributor.authorPrasad, Pushkalaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaproni, Paula J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T13:58:47Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T13:58:47Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationPrasad, Pushkala; Caproni, Paula (1997). "Critical Theory in the Management Classroom: Engaging Power, Ideology, and Praxis." Journal of Management Education 21(3): 284-291. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68772>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1052-5629en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68772
dc.description.abstractIn this article, the authors discuss the relevance of critical theory for management education. They begin by distinguishing critical theory from critical thinking and then highlight the main features of critical theory: social construction, power and ideology, totality, and praxis. The article then introduces the remaining articles that constitute the special segment on critical theory and management education.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent770795 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleCritical Theory in the Management Classroom: Engaging Power, Ideology, and Praxisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Calgaryen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68772/2/10.1177_105256299702100302.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/105256299702100302en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Management Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlvesson, M. (1987). Organization theory and technocratic consciousness: Rationality, ideology and quality of work. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1-21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoje, D. M., & Dennehey, R. F., (1994). Managing in the postmodern world: America's revolution against exploitation (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaproni, P., & Arias, M. E. (1997). Managerial skills training from a critical perspective. Journal of Management Education, 21, 292-308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerrida, J. (1981). Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerguson, K. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoucault, M. (1979) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York: Fawcett Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrost, P. (1980). Toward a radical framework for practising organization science. Academy of Management Review, 5, 501-508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHabermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society. London: Heineman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHabermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. London: Heineman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1947). The dialectics of enlightenment. London: Verso.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJermier, J. M. (1985). When the sleeper awakes: A short story extending themes in radical organization theory. Journal of Management, 11, 67-80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcuse, H. (1966). Eros and civilization. Boston: Beacon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills, A. J., & Simmons, T. (1995). Reading organizational theory: A critical approach. Toronto: Garamond.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNord, W. (1974). The failure of current applied behavioral science. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 10, 557-578.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad, A., & Prasad, P. (1993). Reconceptualizing alienation in management inquiry: Critical organizational scholarship and workplace empowerment. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 169-183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen, M. (1987). Critical administrative scholarship, praxis and the academic workplace. Journal of Management, 13, 573-586.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaring, S. (1991). Taylorism transformed: Scientific management since 1945. Chappel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, D. L. (1995, February 17). A growing number of scientists reject the concept of race. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmer, L. (1988). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems, 35, 64-77.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_105256299702100302.pdf
Size:
752.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.