Show simple item record

The Republican Who Did Not Want to Become President: Colin Powell's Impact on Evaluations of the Republican Party and Bob Dole

dc.contributor.authorStapel, Diederiken_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Norberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:00:30Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:00:30Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationStapel, Diederik; Schwarz, Norbert (1998). "The Republican Who Did Not Want to Become President: Colin Powell's Impact on Evaluations of the Republican Party and Bob Dole." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24(7): 690-698. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68801>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68801
dc.description.abstractIn this study, respondents' attention was either drawn to Colin Powell's decision to join the Republican Party or to his decision not to run as a presidential candidate of this party before they began to evaluate the Republican Party or Bob Dole. When the Republican Party was first evaluated, thinking about Powell's party membership resulted in more favorable evaluations and thinking about his refusal to run as its candidate resulted in less favorable evaluations relative to a control condition. When Bob Dole was first evaluated, thinking of Powell always resulted in more negative evaluations. Moreover, carryover effects between both judgments were observed (i.e., initial judgments of the party affected subsequent judgments about Dole, and vice versa, in an additive manner). The results are consistent with predictions derived from Schwarz and Bless's inclusion/exclusion model of social judgment.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1697236 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleThe Republican Who Did Not Want to Become President: Colin Powell's Impact on Evaluations of the Republican Party and Bob Doleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Amsterdam, sp-stapel@macmail.psy.uva.nlen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68801/2/10.1177_0146167298247002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146167298247002en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Context effects in political judgment: Assimilation and contrast as a function of categorization processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 159-172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1987). Social cognition and social reality: Information acquisition and use in the laboratory and the real world. In H.J. Hippler, N. Schwarz, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Social information processing and survey methodology (pp. 60-41). New York: Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, D. R. (1953). Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 199-214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCialdini, R. B., Borden, R., Thorne, A., Walker, M., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecision by Powell included six weeks of intense pendulum swings. (1995, November 12). The New York Times, p. Al2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceExcerpts from General Powell's news conference of political plans. (1995, November 9). The New York Times, p. A1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming:Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R.(1986). More than meets the eye: Television news, priming, and presidential evaluations. In G. Comstock (Ed.), Public communication and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 135-171). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIyengar, S., & Ottati, V. (1994). Cognitive perspective in political psychology. In R S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 2 (2nd ed., pp. 143-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowell rules out a 1996 race, citing his lack of 'calling." (1995, November 9). The New York Times, p. A10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991), Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992a). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992b). Scandals and the public's trust in politicians: Assimilation and contrast effects. Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 574-579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., Groves, R., & Schuman, H. (in press). Survey methods. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: Random House.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H. P. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 3-23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (Eds.). (1992). Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStapel, D. A., & Spears, R. (in press). Guilty by disassociation (and innocent by association): The impact of relevant and irrelevant analogies on political judgments. Political Behavior.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrack, F. (1992). The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 249-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: The social determinants of information use in judgments of life-satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429-442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourangeau, R. (1992). Attitudes as memory structures: Belief sampling and context effects. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 35-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourangeau, R, & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299-314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, T. D., & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1996, May). Contrast and assimilation, with and without awareness: A test of the inclusion/exclusion model Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZaller,J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.