Show simple item record

In-Group Favoritism and Perceived Similarity: A Look at Russians' Perceptions in the Post-Soviet Era

dc.contributor.authorHenderson-King, Eaaronen_US
dc.contributor.authorHenderson-King, Donna H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhermer, Natalyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPosokhova, Svetlanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiker, Veraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:05:24Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:05:24Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationHenderson-King, Eaaron; Henderson-King, Donna; Zhermer, Natalya; Posokhova, Svetlana; Chiker, Vera (1997). "In-Group Favoritism and Perceived Similarity: A Look at Russians' Perceptions in the Post-Soviet Era." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(10): 1013-1021. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68883>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68883
dc.description.abstractUsing social identity theory, belief congruence theory, and optimal distinctiveness theory as frameworks, the authors examined whether perceived threat would moderate the relationship between perceived out-group similarity and group evaluations. Russian undergraduates evaluated Russians, Ukrainians, Moldavians, and Georgians on a number of dimensions. It was expected that when an out-group was seen as a severe threat, perceived similarity would result in in-group bias. However, when an out-group was viewed as nonthreatening, perceived similarity was expected to be negatively related to in-group bias. As hypothesized, although perceived similarity and in-group bias were negatively related for those who felt unthreatened by Georgians, a nonsignificant positive relationship existed for those feeling threatened.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1833769 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleIn-Group Favoritism and Perceived Similarity: A Look at Russians' Perceptions in the Post-Soviet Eraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLoyola University Chicago, henderse@gvsu.eduen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. Petersburg State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. Petersburg Pedagogical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. Petersburg State Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68883/2/10.1177_01461672972310002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/01461672972310002en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrams, D. (1992). Processes of social identification. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of identity and self-concept (pp. 57-99). London: Surrey University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronfenbrenner, U. (1961). The mirror image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist's report. Journal of Social Issues, 17, 45-56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R. J. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 603-623). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R. J., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effect of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78-92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283-311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiehl, M. (1988). Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup similarity on discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 289-300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1988). A continuum model of impression formation: From category-based to individuating processes as a function of information, motivation, and attention. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldenberg, S. (1994). Pride of small nations: The Caucasus and post-soviet disorder. London: Zed.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenderson-King, E. (1995). Social communication and the magnification of negative feelings towards Blacks. Unpublished manuscript.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenderson-King, E. I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1996). Anti-Black prejudice as a function of exposure to the negative behavior of a single Black person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 654-664.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinkle, S., & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Springer-Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInsko, C. A., Nacoste, R. W., & Moe, J. L. (1983). Belief congruence and racial discrimination: Review of the evidence and critical evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 153-174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaspars, J. M. F., & Warnaen, S. (1982). Intergroup relations, ethnic identity, and self-evaluation in Indonesia. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 335-366). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKremenyuk, V. A. (1994). Conflicts in and around Russia: Nation-building in difficult times. London: Greenwood.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLydon, J. E., Jamieson, D. W., & Zanna, M. P. (1988). Interpersonal similarity and the social and intellectual dimensions of first impressions. Social Cognition, 6, 269-286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoghaddam, F. M., & Stringer, P. (1988). Outgroup similarity and intergroup bias. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 105-115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMummendey, A., & Schreiber, H. J. (1984). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 231-233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewcombe, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNg, S. H. (1986). Equity, intergroup bias and interpersonal bias in reward allocation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 239-255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlatow, M. J., Mc Clintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221-239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReif, K., & Melich, A. (1991). Euro-Barometer 30: Immigrants and out-groups in Western Europe, October-November 1988. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccas, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 581-595.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokeach, M., & Mezei, L. (1966). Race and shared belief as factors in social choice. Science, 151, 167-172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalazar, J. M., & Marin, G. (1977). National stereotypes as a function of conflict and territorial proximity: A test of the mirror image hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 13-19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStruch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364-373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. (1978). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorndike, R. M., Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, J. C. (1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favoritism. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 235-250). London: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UB: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWetzel, C. G., & Insko, C. A. (1982). The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 253-276.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.