View Item 

Show simple item record

Meta-Analysis of Experimental Manipulations: Some Factors Affecting the Velten Mood Induction Procedure
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Randy J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSinnett, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:08:36Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:08:36Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.citationLarsen, Randy; Sinnett, Laura (1991). "Meta-Analysis of Experimental Manipulations: Some Factors Affecting the Velten Mood Induction Procedure." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17(3): 323-334. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68937>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68937
dc.description.abstractManipulation validity may be influenced by many factors, including specific aspects of experimental procedure. Meta-analysis is an ideal tool for assessing factors that influence manipulations because it is capable of equating, combining, and gauging the impact of different experimental procedures on a given manipulation. This use of meta-analysis is demonstrated by meta-analyzing experiments employing the Velten mood manipulation. This manipulation has been criticized for creating experimental demand. Procedures relevant to experimental demand include whether an honest or deceptive cover story is used and whether a self-report or non-self-report manipulation check measure is used. Effect sizes are smaller when a deceptive (vs. honest) cover story is used and when a non-self-report (vs. self-report) manipulation check measure is used. Discussion concerns how the Velten manipulation may be compromised and how meta-analysis may be employed to evaluate factors influencing manipulation validity.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2327050 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleMeta-Analysis of Experimental Manipulations: Some Factors Affecting the Velten Mood Induction Procedureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGrinnell Collegeen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68937/2/10.1177_0146167291173013.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146167291173013en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Viscusi, D. (1981). Induced mood and the illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1129-1140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkowitz, L., & Troccoli, B. T. (1986). An examination of the assumptions in the demand characteristics thesis: With special reference to the Velten mood induction procedure. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 337-349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229-246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchwald, A. M., Strack, S., & Coyne,J. C. (1981). Demand characteristics and the Velten mood induction procedure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 478-479.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, M., Charlin, B., & Miller, N. (1988). Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 211-229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, D. M. (1983). On the induction of depressed mood in the laboratory: Evaluation and comparison of the Velten and musical procedures. Advances in Behavioral Research and Therapy, 5, 27-49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, R. E. (1975). Manipulation of self-esteem as a determinant of mood of elated and depressed women. Journal of Abnornal Psychology, 84, 693-700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlass, G. V., Mc Gaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodwin, A. M., & Williams, J. M. (1982). Mood induction research: Its implications for clinical depression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 20, 373-382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedges, L. V. (1982). Fitting categorical models to effect sizes from a series of experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 119-137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cogni-tion. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsen, A. M., & Gorgoglione, J. M. (1983). Some specific effects of four affect-induction procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 136-143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenealy, P. M. (1986). The Velten mood induction procedure: A methodological review. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 315-335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeventhal, H., & Tomarken, A. J. (1986). Emotion: Today's problems. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 565-610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment with particular reference to demand characteristics. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolivy, J., & Doyle, D. (1980). Laboratory induction of mood states through the reading of self-referent mood statements: Affective changes or demand characteristics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 286-290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500-504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1977). Self-focused attention and the experience of emotion: Attraction, repulsion, elation, and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 625-636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger,J. A., & Salovey, P. (1988). Mood and memory: Evaluating the network theory of affect. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 211-251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeasdale,J. D., & Taylor, R. (1981). Induced mood and accessibility of memories: An effect of mood state or of induction procedure?British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 39-48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 473-482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWispe, L. (1980). The role of moods in helping behavior. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 11, 2-15.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_0146167291173013.pdf
Size:
2.219MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.