Show simple item record

Discourse in the Marketplace: The Making of Meaning in Annual Reports

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Janeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:10:08Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:10:08Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.citationThomas, Jane (1997). "Discourse in the Marketplace: The Making of Meaning in Annual Reports." Journal of Business Communication 34(1): 47-66. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68963>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68963
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews linguistic structures in a series of management messages in the annual reports of Cross & Trecker, a machine tool manufacturer. The docu ments cover the years 1984-1988, which began with prosperity and ended with severe losses. An analysis of how the company communicated this information to its shareholders offers some insights into the motivation and priorities of the Cross & Trecker management. This analysis suggests that a company's public communications are more complex than has been thought. Specific methodology used is based on systemic theory, developed by Halli day (1976, 1978, 1985a, 1985b) and others and employs the systems of transitivity (verb structures), thematic structure (subjects), context and cohesion, and condensations. Verb structures show a predictable increase in passive constructions as the years pass and profits decrease. Regarding other verb structures, however, the results were more complex, including an increase in the use of verbs of "being." Combined with the analysis of thematic structures, which show an increase in nonhuman agents, and contextual features shown by cohesion and condensa tions, the conclusion is that, as the news becomes more negative, linguistic structures suggest a factual, "objective" situation caused by circumstances not attributable to any persons who might otherwise be thought responsible.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1156713 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleDiscourse in the Marketplace: The Making of Meaning in Annual Reportsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68963/2/10.1177_002194369703400103.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/002194369703400103en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Business Communicationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, P.V. (1995). Technical writing: A reader-centered approach (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, C.J., & Imperia, G. (1992). The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals. The Journal of Business Communication, 29, 113-127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArfin, F.N. (1993). Annual reports that pay their way. London: Pitman Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenson, J. D., & Greaves, W. S. (Eds.). (1988). Systemic functional approaches to discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButler, C. (1985). Systemic linguistics: Theory and applications. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, S. (1990). Explanations in negative messages: More insights from speech act theory. The Journal of Business Communication, 27, 357-377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross & Trecker. (1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990). Annual Reports.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Beaugrande, R. (1993). Linguistic Theory. London: Longman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorrell, J., & Darsey, N. (1991). An analysis of the readability and style of letters to stockholders. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21(1), 73-83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFawcett, R., & Halliday, M. (1978). New Developments in systemic linguistics. London: Batsford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFielden, J.S., & Dulek, R.E. (1984). How to use bottom-line writing in corporate communications. Business Horizons, July/August, 24-30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (Eds.). (1990). Annual review of applied linguistics Vol. 2. New York : Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaggie, D. (1984, August). The annual report as an aid to communication. Accountancy, 66-69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1976). System and function in language. London: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1985a). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M.A.K. (1985b). Spoken and written language. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawkins, D.F., & Hawkins, B.A. (1986). The effectiveness of the annual report as a communication vehicle. Morristown, NJ: Executives Research Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHildebrandt, H.H., & Snyder, R. (1981). The Pollyanna hypothesis in business writing: initial results, suggestions for research. The Journal of Business Communication, 18(1), 5-15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill & Knowlton. (1984). The annual report: A question of credibility. New York: Hill & Knowlton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohut, G., & Segars, A. (1992). The president's letter to stockholders: An examination of corporate communication strategy. The Journal of Business Communication, 29(1), 7-21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1983). Thematic analysis: systems, structures, and strategies. Recherches semiotiques, 3(2), 159-187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1984a). Heteroglossia: Discourse and social conflict. Paper presented at the Conference on Language and Ideology, Sydney, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1984b). Semiotics and education. (Monograph in Toronto Semiotic Circle Monograph Series). Toronto, Canada: Victoria University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1985). Ideology, intertextuality, and register. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives in discourse (pp. 29-50). Norwood NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1987). Social semiotics and science education. American Journal of Semiotics, 5, 217-232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1988). Discourses in conflict: Heteroglossia and text semantics. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Functional perspectives and discourse (pp. 29-50). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1989a). Intertextuality and text semantics. In M. Gregory & P. Fries (Eds.), Discourse in society: Functional perspectives (pp. 85-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. (1989b). The genres of power: Reading and writing in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 1, 81-89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLimaye, M., & Pompian, R. (1991). The Journal of Business Communication, 28, 7-23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyne, A. (1985). Ideational, interpersonal, and textual macrofunctions applied to lexicometric work on French business correspondence. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse Vol. 2 (pp. 125-136). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, H., & Hildebrandt, H. (1991). Effective business communications (6th ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley, K. (1991). Passive voice and rhetorical role in scientific writing. Journal of technical writing and communication, 21(3), 239-257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSearle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSubramanian, R., Insley, R., & Blackwell, R. (1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 50-61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwales, J. (1990). Discourse analysis in professional contexts. In Benson & Greaves (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics (pp. 103-115). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVande Kopple, W. (1991). Themes, thematic progressions, and some implications for understanding discourse. Written Communication, 8(3), 311-347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVining, J. (1986). The authoritative and the authoritarian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinsor, D. (1993). Owning corporate texts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(2), 179-195.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.