Show simple item record

The Responses of Drug Abuse Treatment Organizations to Financial Adversity: A Partial Test of the Threat-Rigidity Thesis

dc.contributor.authorD'Aunno, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Robert I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:10:19Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:10:19Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationD'Aunno, Thomas; Sutton, Robert (1992). "The Responses of Drug Abuse Treatment Organizations to Financial Adversity: A Partial Test of the Threat-Rigidity Thesis." Journal of Management 18(1): 117-131. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68966>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0149-2063en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/68966
dc.description.abstractThis article derives hypotheses from the threat-rigidity model about organizational responses tofinancial adversity. These hypotheses are tested in a national sample of 72 randomly selected drug abuse treatment organizations. We propose that decreasing funding levels and numbers of funding sources will be associated with four classes of rigidities in organizations: (a) restriction in information processing (rigid use of existing organizational procedures), (b) constriction of control (less participative decision making), (c) conservation of resources (work force reduction), and (d) competition among members. The threat-rigidity thesis is supported by findings that decreases in total budgets are associated with rigid use of existing procedures, work force reduction, and competition among organization members. Further; decreases in number offunding sources are associated with less participative decision making, work force reduction, and more competition among members.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1892710 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleThe Responses of Drug Abuse Treatment Organizations to Financial Adversity: A Partial Test of the Threat-Rigidity Thesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherStanford Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68966/2/10.1177_014920639201800108.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/014920639201800108en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Managementen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron, K. S., Kim, M. U., & Whetten, D. A.1987a. Organizational effects of decline and turbulence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 222-241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron, K. S., Whetten D. A., & Kim, M. U.1987b. Organizational dysfunctions of decline. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 126-138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD'Aunno, T. & Price, R. P.1986. Linked systems: Drug abuse and mental health services. In W. Richard Scott & Bruce L. Black (Eds.), The organization of mental health services: 277-307. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoa, U. 1971. Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171: 345-351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord, J. D., & Baucus, D. A.1987. Organizational adaptation to performance downturns: An interpretation-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 12: 366-380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman, J. H., & Hannan, M. T.1975. Growth and decline processes in organizations. American Sociological Review, 40: 215-228.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGladstein, D. L., & Reilly, N. P.1985. Group decision making under threat: The tycoon game. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 613-627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHambrick, D. C., & Schecter, S. M.1983. Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 231-248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirschhorn, L., & Associates. 1983. Cutting back: Retrenchment and redevelopment in human and community services. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs, D. 1974. Dependency and vulnerability: An exchange approach to the control of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 45-59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanis, I. L. 1982. Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKerlinger, F.N., & Pedhazur, E.J.1973. Multiple regression in behavioral research. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeindl, J. R., Ehrlich S. B., & Dukerich, J. M.1985. The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 78-102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H.1984. To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12: 53-65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerry, L. T. 1986. Least-cost alternatives to layoffs in declining industries. Organizational Dynamics, 12: 48-61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfeffer, J., & Leblebici, H.1973. The effects of competition on some dimensions of organizational structure. Social Forces, 52: 268-279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R.1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C.1969. The context of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 91-114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRousseau, D. M. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. In Larry L. Cummings & Barry M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 7:1-37. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, I. S. 1977. Universities in stress: Decision making under conditions of reduced resources. Social Science Quarterly, 58: 242-254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott, W. R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, M. E. 1976. Group dynamics (2nd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStarbuck, W. H., Greve A., & Hedberg, B. L. T.1978. Responding to crises. Journal of Business Administration, 9: 111-137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStaw, B. M., Sandelands L. E., & Dutton, J. E.1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 501-524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStinchcombe, A. L. 1965. Organizations and social structure. In James G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations: 142-193. Chicago: Rand-Mc Nally.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSurvey of Organizations. 1980. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan and Rensis Likert Associates, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutton, R. I., Eisenhardt K. M., & Jucker, J. V.1986. Managing organizational decline: Lessons from Atari. Organizational Dynamics, 14: 17-29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutton, R. I., & D'Aunno, T.1989. Decreasing organizational size: Untangling the effects of money and people. Academy of Management Review, 14: 194-212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, K. 1976. Conflict and conflict management. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: 889-936. Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. J.1980. Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren, D. L. 1984. Managing in crisis: Nine principles for successful transition. In J. R. Kimberly & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models: 71-93. New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisner, C., & Room, R.1984. Financing and ideology in alcohol treatment. Social Problems, 32: 167-184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhetten, D. A. 1980a. Organizational decline: A neglected topic in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5: 577-588.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhetten, D. A. 1980b. Organizational decline: Sources, responses, and effects. In John Kimberly & Robert Miles (Eds.), Organizational life cycles: 342-374. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZajonc, R. B. 1965. Social facilitation. Science, 149: 269-274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZander, A. 1979. The psychology of group process. Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.