View Item 

Show simple item record

Cognitive Social Psychology
dc.contributor.authorManis, Melvinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:14:08Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:14:08Z
dc.date.issued1977en_US
dc.identifier.citationManis, Melvin (1977). "Cognitive Social Psychology." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 3(4): 550-566. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69030>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69030
dc.description.abstractSocial psychology is presently dominated by cognitive theories that emphasize the importance of personal beliefs and in tellective processes as the immediate determinants of behavior. The present paper explores two areas of.research within this tra dition : (1) beliefs about the external world, and (2) beliefs about the self. The paper concludes with a brief critique of the cognitive approach to social psychology.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1053518 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleCognitive Social Psychologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Hospitalen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69030/2/10.1177_014616727700300402.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/014616727700300402en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbelson, R.P. Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In Carroll, J. S. & Payne, J. W. (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAjzen, I. Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 303-314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAronson, E. Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., Mc Guire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M.J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 191-215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandura, A., Adams, N.E. & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 125-139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 183-200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBem, D.J. Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 6), New York: Academic Press, 1972.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBem, D.J. & Allen, A. On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 506-520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgida, E. & Nisbett, R.E. Scientific deduction: Evidence is not necessarily informative. A reply to Wells and Harvey. Unpublished manuscript, 1977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnstein, E. & Vinokur, A. Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 315-332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarley, J.M. & Latane, B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 8, 377-383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawes, R.M. Shallow psychology. In Carroll, J. S. & Payne, J. W. (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior. Hillsdale, N. J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEagly, A.H. Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 758-773.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFestinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, 1957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischoff, B. Attribution theory and judgment under uncertainty. In J. H. Harvey & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1976.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 59-74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedman, J.L. & Fraser, S.C. Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 195-202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerard, H.B., Blevans, S.A. & Malcolm, T. Self-evaluation and the evaluation of choice alternatives. Journal of Personality, 1964, 32, 395-410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenwald, A.G. Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In Greenwald, A. G., Brock, T. C. & Ostrom, J. M. (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, R.D. & Donoghue, J.M. The power of consensus: Information derived from one's own and others' behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 294-302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, E.E. & Harris, V.A. The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D. & Tversky, A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 237-251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelley, H.S. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1967, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelley, H.S. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 107-128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiesler, C.A. & Pallak, M.S. Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 1014-1025.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinder, D.E. Cooper, J. & Jones, E.E. Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 245-254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalewski, A. The influence of positive and negative self-evaluation on post-decisional dissonance. Polish Sociological Bulletin, 1962, 34, 39-49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManis, M. & Dovalina, I. Base-rates can affect individual predictions. In preparation, 1977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkus, H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 53-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Arthur, L.A. The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 171-193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Gowan, J. & Gormly, J. Validation of personality traits: A multicriteria approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 791-795.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Guire, W.J. A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. In Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., Mc Guire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. Attitude organization and change. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Guire, W.J. Theory of the structure of human thought. In Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., Mc Guire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (Rds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand Mc Nalley & Company, 1968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Guire, W.J. Suspiciousness of experimenter's intent. In Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. New York : Academic Press, 1969.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMc Guire, W.J. & Padawer-Singer, T. Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 743-754.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, R.L., Brickman, P., & Bolen, D. Attribution versus persuasion as a means of modifying behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 430-441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMischel, W. Personality and Assessment. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1968.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisbett, R.E. & Borgida, E. Attribution and the psychology of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 932-943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisbett, R.E. & Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 231-259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrvis, B.R., Cunningham, J.D. & Kelley, H.H. A closer examination of causal inference: The roles of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 29, 426-434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, C.R. & Beach, L.R. Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 68, 29-46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePryor, J.B. & Kriss, M. The cognitive dynamics of salience in the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 49-55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers, C.R. Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton, 1951.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen, N.A. & Wyer, R.S. Some further evidence for the "Socratic effect" using a subjective probability model of cognitive organization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 420-424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L., Greene, D. & House, P. The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 279-301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuble, D.N. & Feldman, N.S. Order of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 930-937.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchacter, S. & Singer, J.E. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional stgte. Psychological Review, 1963, 69, 379-399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuman, H. & Johnson, M.P. Attitudes and behavior. In Annual Review of Sociology. 1976, (Vol. 2), 161-207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeligman, M. E.P. Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of human information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971, 6, 649-744.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStorms, M.C. Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 165-175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The belief in the "law of small numbers." Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 105-110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185, 1124-1131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Causal thinking in judgement under uncertainty. In B. Butts & J. Hintikka (Eds.), Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValins, S. & Ray, A.A. Effects of cognitive desensitization on avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 345-350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWicker, A.W. Attitudes vs. actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 41-78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYandell, B. & Insko, C.I. Attribution of attitudes to speakers and listeners under assigned-behavior conditions: Does behavior engulf the field? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 269-278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner, B. Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristowot New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells, G.L. & Harvey, J.H. Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 279-293.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyer, R.S. Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. Potomac, Maryland: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZanna, M.P. & Cooper, J. Dissonance and the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1), Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1976.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
10.1177_014616727700300402.pdf
Size:
1.004MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.