Show simple item record

Three Levels of Learning in Simulations: Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writing

dc.contributor.authorPetranek, Charlesen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorey, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Rebeccaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:14:43Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:14:43Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.citationPetranek, Charles; Corey, Susan; Black, Rebecca (1992). "Three Levels of Learning in Simulations: Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writing." Simulation & Gaming 23(2): 174-185. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69040>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-8781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69040
dc.description.abstractSimulations and games provide three levels of learning: through participating, debriefing and writing. While taking part in the simulation; the participant experiences different types off acts, emotions, relationships, strategies, and feelings. The participant learns to handle various social situations and experience the excitement of discovery. During the debriefing discussions, the student harnesses the vast information and makes sense out of these experiences by sharing his ideas and listening to other's impressions. The debriefer facilitates the discussion by using the four Es of debriefing: events, emotions, empathy, and explanations. The assumption of oral debriefing is that all participants learn the same things at the same time and in the same manner. Journal writing significantly extends the analytical learning process by requiring each participant to organize the material and debrief on an individual basis. The richness of the journal develops frm the writer weaving his own personal thread through his experiences, through other's encounters, and through theoretical concepts. The writing provides a record of each student's learning experience.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent1208898 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.subject.otherDebriefingen_US
dc.subject.otherEmotionsen_US
dc.subject.otherEmpathyen_US
dc.subject.otherEventsen_US
dc.subject.otherExperiential Learningen_US
dc.subject.otherExplanationsen_US
dc.subject.otherFour Es of Debriefingen_US
dc.subject.otherGamingen_US
dc.subject.otherJournal Writingen_US
dc.subject.otherLearningen_US
dc.subject.otherParticipatingen_US
dc.subject.otherSimulationen_US
dc.titleThree Levels of Learning in Simulations: Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern Indianaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIndiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolisen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69040/2/10.1177_1046878192232005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1046878192232005en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSimulation & Gamingen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbt, C. (1972). The reunion of action and thought. In W. Gamson (Ed.), SIMSOC (2nd ed., pp. 37-39). New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBacon, F. (1883). The essays or, counsels, civil and moral of Francis Bacon. London: Chesterfield Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBredemeier, M., & Greenblat, C. (1981). The educational effectiveness of simulation games. Simulation & Games, 12, 307-331.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenter for Social Organization of Schools. (1980). Information processing: T1wo modes of learning. In R. Stadsklev (Ed.), Handbook of simulation gaming in social education part I: Textbook (pp. 26-32). University, AL: Institute of Higher Education Research & Services.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCherryholmes, C. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: Implications for alternative strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 4-7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, J. S. (1980). Academic games and learning. In R. Stadsklev (Ed.), Handbook of simulation gaming in social education part l: Textbook (pp. 15-25). University, AL: Institute of Higher Education Research & Services.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoppard, L C., & Goodman, F. L. (1979). Urban gaming/simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: School of Education, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbeil, P., Laveault, D. & Saint-Germain, M. (1989). Games and simulation activities: Tools for international development education. Hull, Quebec: Canadian International Development Agency.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition & Communication, 28, 122-130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster, J. L., Lachman, A. C., & Mason, R. M. (1980). Verstehen, cognition, and the impact of political simulations. Simulation & Games, 11, 223-241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamson, W. (1978). SIMSOC: Simulated society, coordinator's manual (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGillespie, J. A. (1973). The game doesn't end with winning. Viewpoints, 49, 21-27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenblat, C. S., & Duke, R. D. (1975). Gaming-simulation: Rationale, design & application. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHankinson, H. (1987). The cognitive and affective learning effects of debriefing after a simulation game (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 04A.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarry, L. (1971). Using simulations in the classroom. In R.H.R. Armstrong & J. L. Taylor (Eds.), Feedback on instructional simulation systems (pp. 127-134). Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHilton, C. B. (1989). Cultural literacy and business students. Clearing House, 62, 305-308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu, E. (1989). Role-event gaming situation in management education. Simulation & Games, 20,404-438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrmscher, W. F. (1979). Writing as a way of learning and developing. College Composition and Communication, 30, 240-244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaiser, B. R. (1961, March). The way of the journal. Psychology Today, pp. 64-76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman, L. C. (1984). Debriefing: A critical reexamination of the postexperience analytic process with implications for its effective use. Simulation & Games, 15, 415-431.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman, M. J. (1973). A comparison of student projections: Magic and the teaching of writing. College English, 34, 674-689.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinot, S. W. (1989). Personality & persona: Developing the self. Rhetoric Review, 7,352-363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetranek, C. F. (1989). Know oneself: A symbolic interactionist view of simulation. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and Simulation (pp. 109-116). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierfy, D. (1977). Comparative simulation game research: Stumbling blocks & stepping stones. Simulation & Games, 8, 255-268.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaser, J. R. (1969). Simulation & society: An exploration of scientific gaming. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaths, J. (1987, October). Enhancing understanding through debriefing. Educational Leadership, pp. 24-27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRumpf, D. L., Melachrinoudis, E., & Sanjay, M. (1988). Student journals in engineering education: Do they work?Engineering Education, 78, 313-316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStadsklev, R. (1980). Handbook of simulation gaming in social education. University, AL: Institute of Higher Education Research & Services.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThatcher, D. (1990). Promoting learning through games and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 21, 262-273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWollman-Bonilla, J. E. (1989, November). Reading journals: Invitations to participate in literature. The Reading Teacher, pp. 112-120.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.