Show simple item record

In the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefs

dc.contributor.authorEccles, Jacquelynne S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWigfield, Allanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:15:01Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:15:01Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.citationEccles, Jacquelynne; Wigfield, Allan (1995). "In the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefs." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(3): 215-225. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69045>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69045
dc.description.abstractThe authors assessed the dimensionality of and relations between adolescents' achievement-related beliefs and self perceptions, focusing on subjective valuing of achievement. Beliefs derived from expectancy-value theory (adolescents' valuing of achievement activities, expectancies for success and ability perceptions, and perceptions of task difficulty) were assessed. Adolescents completed questionnaires once a year for 2 years. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that achievement-related beliefs separate into three task values factors (interest, perceived importance, and perceived utility), one expectancy/ability factor (comprising beliefs about one's competence, expectancies for success, and performance perceptions), and two task difficulty factors (perceptions of difficulty and perceptions of effort required to do well). Task values and ability perceptions factors were positively related to each other and negatively correlated to perceptions of task difficulty.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2019461 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleIn the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69045/2/10.1177_0146167295213003.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146167295213003en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBattle, E. (1966). Motivational determinants of academic competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 534-642.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovington, M. V. (1984). The motive for self-worth. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 77-113). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrandall, V. C. (1969). Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children (pp. 11-45). New York: Russell Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 97-132). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 15-19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26-43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles, J., Wigfield, A., Blumenfeld, P., & Harold, R. (1984). Psychological predictors of competence development. Unpublished grant proposal to the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 405-416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeather, N. T. (1982). Human values and the prediction of action: An expectancy-value analysis. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 263-289). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischoff, B., Goitein, B., & Shapira, Z. (1982). The experienced utility of expected utility approaches. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 315-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarter, S. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Development, 53, 87-97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 55-121). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283-329.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJÖreskog, K. G., & SÖrbom, K. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Chicago: National Educational Resources.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKukla, A. (1972). Foundations of an attributional theory of performance. Psychological Review, 79, 454-470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKukla, A. (1978). An attributional theory of choice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 113-144). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Mc Donald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (1985). Self-concept: Its multifaceted hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107-123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholls, J. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perceptions of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development49, 800-814.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, J. E. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions and academic choice: Origins and change. Unpublished final technical report to the National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 186 477)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, J. E., & Goff, S. B. (1980). Achievement motivation and values: An alternative perspective. In L. J. Fyans (Ed.), Achievement motivation (pp. 349-373). New York: Plenum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, J. E., & Ruble, D. N. (1977). The development of achievement-related expectancies. Child Development, 48, 1075-1079.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokeach, M. (1980). Some unresolved issues in theories of beliefs, attitudes, and values. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 261-304). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRotter, J. B. (1982). Social learning theory. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 241-260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1989, March). Relations of expectancies and values to students' math grades and intentions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 1-41.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.