Show simple item record

Re-Examining the Frustrated Homemaker Hypothesis

dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Aloenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGurin, Patriciaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:16:58Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:16:58Z
dc.date.issued1981en_US
dc.identifier.citationTownsend, Aloen; Gurin, Patricia (1981). "Re-Examining the Frustrated Homemaker Hypothesis." Work and Occupations 8(4): 464-488. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69078>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0730-8884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69078
dc.description.abstractMultiple Classification Analyses on responses from 946 white women, drawn from the 1972 American National Election Study survey, were used to test the "frustrated homemaker hypothesis" that full-time homemakers are more dissatisfied with their lives than women employed outside the home. The fit between actual and desired roles proved to be a better predictor of personal satisfaction than the traditional dichotomy between homemakers and employed women. Homemakers who had wanted a career were more personally dissatisfied than homemakers who had never wanted a career. The career-oriented homemakers were the ones who expressed greater personal dissatisfaction than employed women. Employed women and career-oriented homemakers were about equally critical of women's collective position in society, while homemakers who had never wanted a career were more accepting of women's status quo. The importance of including evaluations of both personal and collective well-being was shown by the fact that these two domains bore different relationships to employment-homemaker status.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent981493 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleRe-Examining the Frustrated Homemaker Hypothesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69078/2/10.1177_073088848100800404.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/073088848100800404en_US
dc.identifier.sourceWork and Occupationsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrews, F., J. Morgan, J. Sonquist and L. Klem (1973) Multiple Classification Analysis. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernard, J. (1972) The Future of Marriage. New York: Bantam Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanchard, C., J. Becker and A. Bristow (1976) "Attitudes of southern women: selected group comparisons." Psychology of Women Q. 1, 2: 160-171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, A., P. Converse, W. Rodgers (1976) The Quality of American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrosby, F. (1978) "Relative deprivation and working women: causes of their discontents." Presented at the first annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, New York, September.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEasterlin, R. (1973) "Does money buy happiness?" The Public Interest 30: 3-10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerree, M. (1976) "Working-class jobs: housework and paid work as sources of satisfaction." Social Problems 23: 431-441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFidell, L. (n.d.) "Employment status, role dissatisfaction and the housewife syndrome." Unpublished manuscript. (Available from the author, Psychology Department, California State University, Northridge, California 91324.)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedan, B. (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York : Norton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarman, H. (1967) Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIglehart, A. (1979) Married Women and Work. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLopata, H. (1971) Occupation: Housewife. New York : Oxford Univ. Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMason, K., J. Czajka, and S. Arber (1976) "Change in U.S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964-1974." Amer. Soc. Rev. 41, 4: 573-596.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMolm, L. (1978) "Sex role attitudes and the employment of married women: the direction of causality." Soc. Q. 19: 522-533.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNye, F. and L. Hoffman [eds.] (1963) The Employed Mother in America. Skokie, IL: Rand Mc Nally.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParelius, A. (1975) "Change and stability in college women's orientations toward education, family, and work." Social Problems 22, 3: 420-432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRunciman, W. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. [ed.] (1979) The Subtle Revolution: Women at Work. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThornton, A. and D. Freedman (1979) "Changes in the sex role attitudes of women, 1962-1977: evidence from a panel study." Amer. Soc. Rev. 44, 5: 831-842.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeroff, J., E. Douvan, and R. Kulka (1981) The Inner American: A Self-Portrait from 1957 to 1976. New York: Basic Books.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, J. (1978) "Are working women really more satisfied? evidence from several national surveys." J. of Marriage and the Family 40, 2: 301-313.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.