Show simple item record

Explaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions

dc.contributor.authorLee, Fionaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHallahan, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorHerzog, Thaddeusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T14:18:02Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T14:18:02Z
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, Fiona; Hallahan, Mark; Herzog, Thaddeus (1996). "Explaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributions." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(7): 732-741. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69096>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69096
dc.description.abstractSeveral lines of experimental research have shown that attributional styles are affected by the attributor's culture, inferential goals, and level of cognitive processing. Can these findings be replicated in natural settings? This study compared the attributions made in two domains (sports articles and editorials) of newspapers published in two culturally distinct countries (Hong Kong and the United States). Consistent with the cross-cultural research, attributions were less dispositional in the East than in the West. This cultural difference was weaker in editorials than in sports articles. The authors argue that the higher level of complexity, accountability, and uncertainty in editorials increased the cognitive effort expended to make attributions, which, in turn, attenuated their extremity. Implications for the mixed model of social inference are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent3108 bytes
dc.format.extent2090425 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.titleExplaining Real-Life Events: How Culture and Domain Shape Attributionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherClemson Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBrown Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69096/2/10.1177_0146167296227007.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146167296227007en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletinen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBond, M. (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrittendon, K. (1991). Asian self-effacement or feminine modesty? Attributional patterns of women university students in Taiwan. Gender and Society, 5, 98-117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFletcher, G. J. O., & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, C.ASage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, D. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention, and control (pp. 189-212). New York: Guilford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, D., Krull, D., & Pelham, B. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685-694.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, D., Pelham, B., & Krull, D. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, D., Dunning, D., & Ross, L. (1990). The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1128-1139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric measures. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychology, 34, 107-117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, E., & Harris, V. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, E., & Nisbett, R. (1972). The actor and observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelley, H. (1967). Attributional theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrull, D. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger, E., & Piper, A. (1987). The prevention of mindlessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 280-287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLau, R., & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages: A field test of some current hypotheses in attribution research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkus, H., & Kitayama, K. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 90, 224-253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, J. (1986). Early cross-cultural commonalities in social explanation. Developmental Psychology, 22, 514-520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuattrone, G. (1982). Over attribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42593-607.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill:en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L., Amabile, T., & Steinmetz, J. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, L., Lepper, M., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 817-829.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuster, B., Fosterling, F., & Weiner, B. (1989). Perceiving the causes of success and failure: A cross-cultural explanation of attributional concepts. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 20, 191-213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShweder, R., & Bourne, E. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. Le Vine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, S., & Whitehead, G. (1984). Attributions for promotion and demotion in the United States and India. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 27-34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnyder, M., & Jones, E. (1974). Attitudes attribution when behavior is constrained. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTetlock, P. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York Holt, Rinehart & Winston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner, B. (1985). "Spontaneous" causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74-84.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.