Show simple item record

Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients and distributed diffusion coefficients in high-grade gliomas

dc.contributor.authorKwee, Thomas C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGalbán, Craig J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTsien, Christina I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJunck, Larryen_US
dc.contributor.authorSundgren, Pia C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIvancevic, Marko K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Timothy D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Charles R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRehemtulla, Alnawazen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Brian D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChenevert, Thomas L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T20:03:33Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationKwee, Thomas C.; GalbÁn, Craig J.; Tsien, Christina; Junck, Larry; Sundgren, Pia C.; Ivancevic, Marko K.; Johnson, Timothy D.; Meyer, Charles R.; Rehemtulla, Alnawaz; Ross, Brian D.; Chenevert, Thomas L. (2010). "Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients and distributed diffusion coefficients in high-grade gliomas." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 31(3): 531-537. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69184>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-1807en_US
dc.identifier.issn1522-2586en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69184
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) with distributed diffusion coefficients (DDCs) in high-grade gliomas. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with high-grade gliomas prospectively underwent diffusion-weighted MRI. Traditional ADC maps were created using b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm 2 . In addition, DDC maps were created by applying the stretched-exponential model using b-values of 0, 1000, 2000, and 4000 s/mm 2 . Whole-tumor ADCs and DDCs (in 10 −3 mm 2 /s) were measured and analyzed with a paired t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the Bland-Altman method. Results: Tumor ADCs (1.14 ± 0.26) were significantly lower ( P = 0.0001) than DDCs (1.64 ± 0.71). Tumor ADCs and DDCs were strongly correlated ( R = 0.9716; P < 0.0001), but mean bias ± limits of agreement between tumor ADCs and DDCs was −0.50 ± 0.90. There was a clear trend toward greater discordance between ADC and DDC at high ADC values. Conclusion: Under the assumption that the stretched-exponential model provides a more accurate estimate of the average diffusion rate than the mono-exponential model, our results suggest that for a little diffusion attenuation the mono-exponential fit works rather well for quantifying diffusion in high-grade gliomas, whereas it works less well for a greater degree of diffusion attenuation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:531–537. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent286114 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherImagingen_US
dc.titleComparison of apparent diffusion coefficients and distributed diffusion coefficients in high-grade gliomasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Philips Healthcare, MR Clinical Science, Cleveland, Ohio, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA ; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, B2A209 UH 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20187193en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69184/1/22070_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmri.22070en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.