Show simple item record

Note on Frequency Spectra of Simple Solids from Specific Heat Data

dc.contributor.authorKatz, Ernsten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T21:26:00Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T21:26:00Z
dc.date.issued1951-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationKatz, E. (1951). "Note on Frequency Spectra of Simple Solids from Specific Heat Data." The Journal of Chemical Physics 19(4): 488-493. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69971>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/69971
dc.description.abstractIf the specific heat C(T) of a solid is given as a function of temperature from T=0 to ∞ with infinite accuracy, the frequency spectrum f(ν) is uniquely determined. What information about f(ν) can be derived from specific heat data of experimental accuracy? The following conclusions give the answer.(1) Experimental specific heats determine accurately the low frequency part of the frequency spectrum but allow a latitude, wide enought to fit almost any theory, for its high frequency part.(2) In a Debye plot (effective Debye temperature θ versus T) peaks and dips in the region 0<T<θ/10 represent dips and peaks in the low frequency part of the frequency spectrum. The correspondence is so simple that it can be interpreted at a glance. The peaks and dips are superimposed on a simple Debye spectrum and presumably have a direct physical meaning, in terms of lattice irregularities. Only their centers and total weights are obtainable, so that they act effectively as single Einstein frequencies.(3) In the region θ/5<T<∞ all information obtainable about f(ν) consists of the first few even moments (three for specific heat errors of order one percent, five for 0.1 percent). These can be represented respectively by two or three weighted equivalent Einstein functions without direct physical meaning.(4) The region θ/10<T<θ/5 corresponds to the high frequency part of the frequency spectrum, but hardly any information can be derived here.en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent461576 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleNote on Frequency Spectra of Simple Solids from Specific Heat Dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPhysics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69971/2/JCPSA6-19-4-488-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.1748252en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Chemical Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Blackman, Rept. on Progress in Physics, Phys. Soc. London 8, 11 (1941). E. W. Montroll, J. Chem. Phys. 10, 218 (1942), and 11, 481 (1943). W. V. Houston, Revs. Modern Phys. 20, 161 (1948). R. B. Leighton, Revs. Modern Phys. 20, 165 (1948).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. H. Bauer, J. Chem. Phys. 6, 403 (1938), and 7, 1097 (1939).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Blade and G. E. Kimball, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 626 (1950).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Grayson‐Smith and J. P. Stanley, J. Chem. Phys. 18, 236 (1950).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA combination of Debye and Einstein spectra was previously introduced by Nernst (see E. Schroedinger, Handbuch der Physik (1926), Vol. X, p. 314). His viewpoint, however, was entirely different. His Einstein components represented optical branches for polyatomic crystals and would not occur in monatomic lattices. In the present paper this form is chosen as a way of describing mathematically any empirical C(T)C(T) in a rapidly convergent series.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe qualitative merit of this substitute spectrum was previously pointed out by E. W. Montroll, Quart. App. Math. 5, 223 (1947).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThis relation differs slightly from that given by Mott and Jones in Properties of Metals and Alloys (Oxford University Press, 1936), p. 8, whose factor is 16∕9 instead of 5∕3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSee for instance F. Seitz, Modern Theory of Solids (McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1950), p. 104 or E. Schroedinger, reference 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMott and Jones, reference 7, p. 8, or M. Blackman, reference 1, p. 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Cramer, Mathematical Methods in Statistics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1946), p. 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. B. G. Casimir, oral communication at the summer symposium lectures, Ann Arbor, 1948. It was suggested that Keesom’s measurements on KCl, which show a similar type of fine structure, were not accurate enough to warrant theorizing about this point. This suggestion was based on a discussion of this question between Casimir and Keesom.en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.