Show simple item record

Scalar imaging velocimetry measurements of the velocity gradient tensor field in turbulent flows. II. Experimental results

dc.contributor.authorSu, Lester K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDahm, Werner J. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T21:57:18Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T21:57:18Z
dc.date.issued1996-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationSu, Lester K.; Dahm, Werner J. A. (1996). "Scalar imaging velocimetry measurements of the velocity gradient tensor field in turbulent flows. II. Experimental results." Physics of Fluids 8(7): 1883-1906. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70306>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70306
dc.description.abstractScalar imaging velocimetry is here applied to experimental turbulent flow scalar field data to yield the first fully resolved, non‐intrusive laboratory measurements of the spatio‐temporal structure and dynamics of the full nine‐component velocity gradient tensor field ∇u(x,t), as well as the pressure gradient field ∇p(x,t), in a turbulent flow. Results are from turbulent flows at outer scale Reynolds numbers in the range 3,000≤Reδ≤4,200, with Taylor scale Reynolds numbers Reλ≊45. These give a previously inaccessible level of detailed experimental access to the spatial structure in the velocity gradient tensor field at the small scales of turbulent flows, and through the much longer temporal dimension of these four‐dimensional data spaces allow access to the inertial range of scales as well. Sample spatio‐temporal data planes and probability distributions spanning more than 75 advection time scales (λν/U) are presented for various dynamical fields of interest, including the three components of the velocity field u(x,t), the nine components of the velocity gradient tensor field ∇u(x,t) through the full vector vorticity field ωi(x,t) and tensor strain rate field εij(x,t), the kinetic energy dissipation rate field Φ(x,t)≡2νε:ε(x,t), the enstrophy field 1/2ω⋅ω(x,t), the enstrophy production rate field ω⋅ε⋅ω(x,t), and the pressure gradient field ∇p(x,t). Continuity tests show agreement with the zero divergence requirement that exceeds the highest values reported from single‐point, invasive, multi‐probe measurements. Distributions of strain rate eigenvalues as well as alignments of the strain rate eigenvectors with both the vorticity and scalar gradient vectors are in agreement with DNS results, as are distributions of the measured helicity density fields u⋅ω(x,t). Results obtained for the true kinetic energy dissipation rate field show good agreement, up to 14th‐order, with previous inertial range structure function exponents measured by Anselmet et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63 (1984)] at much higher Reynolds numbers. In addition, probability distributions scaled on inner variables show good agreement among buoyant and non‐buoyant turbulent flow cases, further suggesting that these results are largely indicative of the high Reynolds number state of the inner scales of fully developed turbulent flows. © 1996 American Institute of Physics.en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent1624257 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleScalar imaging velocimetry measurements of the velocity gradient tensor field in turbulent flows. II. Experimental resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGas Dynamics Laboratories, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109‐2118en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/70306/2/PHFLE6-8-7-1883-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.868970en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePhysics of Fluidsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. J. A. Dahm, L. K. Su, and K. B. Southerland, “A scalar imaging velocimetry technique for fully resolved four-dimensional vector velocity field measurements in turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids A 4, 2191 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. K. Su and W. J. A. Dahm, “Scalar imaging velocimetry measurements of the velocity gradient tensor field in turbulent flows. I. Assessment of errors,” Phys. Fluids 8, 1869 (1996).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. B. Southerland, “A four-dimensional experimental study of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent flows,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. B. Southerland and W. J. A. Dahm, “A four-dimensional experimental study of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent flows,” Report No. 026779–12, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1994; submitted to J. Fluid Mech.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. J. A. Dahm, K. B. Southerland, and K. A. Buch, “Direct, high-resolution, four-dimensional measurements of the fine scale structure of Sc≫1Sc≫1 molecular mixing in turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids A 3, 1115 (1991).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. A. Buch, “Fine scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows: Sc≫1,Sc≫1, Sc ≈ 1Sc≈1 and implications for reacting flows,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (Winston, Washington, D.C., 1977).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. R. Bevington and D. K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. K. Su, “Scalar imaging velocimetry: Development and application in measurements of fine structure and dynamics in turbulent flows,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. K. Su and W. J. A. Dahm, “Scalar imaging velocimetry and its application in measurements of the structure and dynamics of the complete velocity gradient tensor in turbulent flows,” Report No. 026779–14, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Jiménez, A. A. Wray, P. G. Saffman, and R. S. Rogallo, “The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Tsinober, E. Kit, and T. Dracos, “Experimental investigation of the field of velocity gradients in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 242, 169 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. K. Batchelor and A. A. Townsend, “The nature of turbulent motion at large wavenumbers,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 199, 238 (1949).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia, “High-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63 (1984).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. N. Kolmogorov, “A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82 (1962).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. Frisch, “From global scaling, á la Kolmogorov, to local multifractal scaling in fully developed turbulence,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 434, 89 (1991).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. M. Rogers and P. Moin, “The structure of the velocity field in homogeneous turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 176, 33 (1987).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. N. Kolmogorov, “Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible fluid at very high Reynolds numbers,” C.R. Acad. Sci. URSS 30, 301 (1941).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. T. Ashurst, A. R. Kerstein, R. M. Kerr, and C. H. Gibson, “Alignment of vorticity and scalar gradient in simulated Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Fluids 30, 2343 (1987).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZ.-S. She, E. Jackson, and S. A. Orszag, “Structure and dynamics of homogeneous turbulence: models and simulations,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 434, 101 (1991).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. M. Rogers and P. Moin, “Helicity fluctuations in incompressible turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids 30, 2662 (1987).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. M. Wallace, J.-L. Balint, and L. Ong, “An experimental study of helicity density in turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids A 4, 2013 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. A. Buch and W. J. A. Dahm, “Fine scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows: Sc≫1,Sc≫1, Sc≫1,Sc≫1, and implications for reacting flows,” Report No. 026779–5, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. R. Dowling, “The estimated scalar dissipation rate in gas-phase turbulent jets,” Phys. Fluids A 3, 2229 (1991).en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.