Show simple item record

Total Collision Cross Sections for the Interaction of Atomic Beams of Alkali Metals with Gases

dc.contributor.authorRothe, Erhard W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, Richard B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T22:12:04Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T22:12:04Z
dc.date.issued1959-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationRothe, Erhard W.; Bernstein, Richard B. (1959). "Total Collision Cross Sections for the Interaction of Atomic Beams of Alkali Metals with Gases." The Journal of Chemical Physics 31(6): 1619-1627. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70463>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/70463
dc.description.abstractTotal collision cross sections (Q) for the interaction of atomic beams of K and Cs with a number of molecules were measured with an apparatus of 30″ angular resolution. Although absolute determinations of Q are difficult, relative values are readily obtained (±3%). Results are reported as the ratio (Q*) of the cross section for a given molecule to that of argon for the same beam atom. Seventy‐seven molecules (of varied complexity and reactivity) were studied with K and 16 with Cs beams. Q* ranged from 0.29 to 2.8.The data were correlated using the Massey‐Mohr theory, assuming an attractive intermolecular potential V(r) = —C/r6. For this case Q=b(C/vr)2/5, where vr is the relative velocity and b a known constant. C was estimated from standard formulas for the London dispersion and dipole‐induced dipole forces, using known refraction and dipole moment data. The theoretical values of Q differ by a nearly constant factor from the experimental results; thus values of Q* are predicted with good accuracy. The deviation between Qcalc* and Qobs* was <±3% for 57% (and <±10% for 87%) of the molecules. Most of the large deviations occurred for the light gases.en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent546961 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleTotal Collision Cross Sections for the Interaction of Atomic Beams of Alkali Metals with Gasesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumChemistry Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/70463/2/JCPSA6-31-6-1619-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.1730662en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Chemical Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Mais, Phys. Rev. 45, 773 (1934).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Rosin and I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 48, 373 (1935).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Rosenberg, Phys. Rev. 55, 1267 (1939).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Rabi, Rev. Sci. Instr. 6, 251 (1935).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJawtusch, Schuster, and Jaeckel, Z. Physik 141, 146 (1955).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Kodera and T. Tamura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 31, 206 (1958).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. S. W. Massey and C. B. O. Mohr, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A144, 188 (1934).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. H. Taylor and S. Datz, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1711 (1955).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Miller and P. Kusch, Phys. Rev. 99, 1314 (1955).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEstermann, Foner, and Stern, Phys. Rev. 71, 250 (1947).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFor some poly‐halogen scattering gases (e.g. CCl4CCl4) it was necessary to oxidize the filament (poisoning of the original oxygen‐free surface gradually lowered the ionization efficiency).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe gauge was constructed and kindly provided by Dr. G. A. Miller.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Klumb and H. Schwarz, Z. Physik 22, 418 (1944).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA pressure of 5×10−4 mm5×10−4mm Hg in the scattering chamber yielded no detectable increase (i.e. <2×10−8 mm Hg<2×10−8mmHg) in the pressure in the detector chamber.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAs pointed out by Rosin and Rabi,2 this equation is an approximation to the accurate one which involves a tedious numerical integration. Appendix I summarizes a number of calculations which show the validity of the approximation in the present case.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Rosenberg, Phys. Rev. 61, 528 (1942).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe changes in Q were probably due primarily to changes in resolution. The largest effects were noted when the slits were cleaned or reset. When the slits began to clog, Q increased (presumably on account of the narrower beam); after cleaning the slits, Q decreased. Improper beam alignment also led to decreased values of Q.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. S. Massey and R. A. Buckingham, Nature 138, 77 (1936).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Hellmann, Acta Physicochim. U.R.S.S. 2, 273 (1935).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Keesom, Physik. Z. 22, 129 (1921).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Debye, Physik. Z. 22, 302 (1921).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. London, Z. Physik 63, 245 (1930).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Slater and J. Kirkwood, Phys. Rev. 37, 682 (1931).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIf T1T1 and T2T2 are the temperatures (°K) of the different species, the appropriate substitution † would be T  =  2T1T2/(T1+T2).T=2T1T2∕(T1+T2). It is to be noted that Eq. (5) is valid only for rrmin  =  (μ1μ2/kT)⅓;rrmin=(μ1μ2∕kT)13; thus for μ1  =  μ2  =  1Dμ1=μ2=1D and T  =  300 °K,T=300°K, rmin  =  2.9A;rmin=2.9A; for μ1  =  1Dμ1=1D and μ2  =  10D,μ2=10D, rmin  =  6.2 A.rmin=6.2A.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe polarizabilities of K and Cs were taken to be 34.0 and 42.0 A3A3, respectively [H. Scheffers and J. Stark, Physik. Z. 35, 625 (1934) ]. The units of μ1μ1 and α1α1 are debyes and A3,A3, respectively. N is obtained by summing the periodic table group numbers for each constituent atom in the scattering molecule (N  =  8N=8 for the noble gases, except for He, where N  =  2N=2).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe same conclusion results from substituting for the denominator a term proportional to 1/I1+1/I21∕I1+1∕I2 (where the I’s are the first ionization potentials of the two species).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. A. Buckingham (private communication), March 17, 1959.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSee, for example, L. Loeb, Kinetic Theory of Gases (McGraw‐Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1934), p. 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Pauly, Z. Angew. Phys. 9, 600 (1957).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAny impurity in the neon would lead to a greater apparent cross section, since Ne is the least effective molecule for beam scattering of those studied. Molecules with lower cross section are known, but these have smaller mass (and thus higher speeds), making them more efficient scatterers.en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.